Abstract
In the current study, two experiments were carried out: the first tested the development of derivational root and word-pattern morphological awareness in Arabic; the second tested morphological processing in Arabic spelling. 143 Arabic native speaking children with normal reading skills in 2nd, 4th and 6th grade participated in the study. The results of the first experiment demonstrated the early emergence of derivational morphological awareness in children, with root awareness emerging earlier than word-pattern awareness. The second experiment supported the implication of morphological processing in spelling words and pseudo words across all grades tested. The results are discussed within a developmental psycholinguistic framework with particular emphasis on the characteristics of the Arabic language and orthography.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2006). Phonological errors predominate in Arabic spelling across grades 1–9. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(2), 167–188.
Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10, Serial No. 238), 1–165.
Arnbak, E., & Elbro, C. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness training on the reading and spelling skills of young dyslexics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(3), 229–251.
Ben-Dror, I., Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1995). Semantic, phonologic, and morphologic skills in reading disabled and normal children. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 876–893.
Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relationship to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 42A(4), 693–711.
Berent, I., & Shimron, J. (1997). The representation of Hebrew words: Evidence from the contour principle. Cognition, 64, 39–72.
Berman, R. A. (1985). The acquisition of Hebrew. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 25–371). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Berman, R. A. (1993). Developmental perspectives on transitivity: A confluence of cues. In Y. Levy (Ed.), Other children, other languages: Issues in the theory of acquisition (pp. 189–241). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Berman, R. A. (1999). Children’s innovative verbs versus nouns: Structured elicitations and spontaneous coinages. In L. Menn & N. Bernstein-Ratner (Eds.), Methods in studying language production (pp. 69–93). Mahhwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition, 81(1), 65–92. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11525482.
Boudelaa, S. (2014). Is the Arabic mental lexicon morpheme-based or stem based? Implications for spoken and written word recognition. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., & Laudanna, A. (1985). Reading mechanisms and the organization of the lexicon: Evidence from acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(1), 81–114.
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169–190.
Clark, E. V., & Berman, R. A. (1984). Structure and use in the acquisition of word formation. Language, 60, 542–590.
Daniels, P. T. (1992). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In P. Downing, S. D. Lima, & M. Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.
Fletcher, M. J. & Denton, C. (2003). Validity of alternative approaches to the identification of L.D.: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. The National Research Center on Learning Disabilities: Symposium focusing on responsiveness-to-intervention, pp. 1–11.
Frost, R., Forster, K., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829–856.
Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279.
Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2006). Typological effects on spelling development: A cross linguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 33, 621–659.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Aims and perspectives in Linguistics. Occasional papers number 1. Applied Linguistics Association of Australia, Center for Language, Learning and Teaching, University of Southern Queensland, Australia.
Jimĕnez, E. J., Siegel, S. L., & Lòpez, R. M. (2003). The relationship between I.Q and reading disabilities in English-speaking Canadian and Spanish children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(1), 15–23.
Larcher, P. (2006). Derivation. In K. Versteegh (Ed.), The encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics (Vol. I, pp. 573–579). Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Levin, I., Ravid, D., & Rapaport, S. (2001). Morphology and spelling among Hebrew-speaking children: From kindergarten to first grade. Journal of Child Language, 28, 741–772.
Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. C. (2002). Learning disabilities. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Child psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 520–586). New York: Guilford.
McCarthy, J. (1981). A prosodic theory of non-concatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 373–418.
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649.
Perfetti, C., Cao, F., & Booth, J. (2013). Specialization and universals in the development of reading skill: How Chinese research informs a universal science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(1), 5–21.
Perfetti, C. A., & Harris, L. N. (2013). Universal reading processes are modulated by language and writing system. Language Learning and Development, 9(4), 296–316.
Ravid, D., & Bar-On, A. (2001). The Semitic root in language acquisition. GALA (Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition), 2001 Proceedings. University of Lisbon, Cidade Universita’ ria—Faculdade de Letras, Portugal.
Ravid, D. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 459–485.
Ravid, D. (2002). A developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology (pp. 293–319). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ravid, D. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling. New York: Springer.
Ravid, D., & Malenky, D. (2001). Awareness of linear and nonlinear morphology in Hebrew: A developmental study. First Language, 21, 25–56.
Ravid, D., & Schiff, R. (2006). Roots and patterns in Hebrew language development: Evidence from written morphological analogies. Reading and Writing, 19, 789–818.
Rubin, H. (1991). Morphological knowledge and writing ability. In R. M. Joshi (Ed.), Written Language Disorders (pp. 43–69). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (in press). Modelling reading in Arabic: Vowelization, morphology and diglossia. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Special Issue, Models of reading in different orthographies (guest editor, Malt Joshi).
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(03), 431–451.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(04), 495–512.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic constraints on children’s ability to isolate phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(04), 607–625.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., Levin, I., Hende, N., & Ziv, M. (2011). The linguistic affiliation constraint and phoneme recognition in diglossic Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 38(02), 297–315.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 169–188.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English-Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic Literacy: Insights and Perspectives (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht: Springer.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Spolsky, B. (2014). Acquiring literacy in a diglossic context: Problems and prospects. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic Literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 225–240). Dordrecht: Springer.
Schiff, R. (2003). The effects of morphology and word length on the reading of Hebrew nominals. Reading and Writing, 16(4), 263–287.
Sénéchal, M. (2000). Morphological effects in children’s spelling of words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 76–85.
Sénéchal, M., Basque, T. M., & Leclaire, T. (2006). Morphological knowledge as revealed in children’s spelling accuracy and reports of spelling strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 231–254.
Taha, H., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2015). The role of phonological versus morphological skills in the development of Arabic spelling: An intervention study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1–29. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9362-6.
Taha, H. Y. (2013). Reading and spelling in Arabic: Linguistic and orthographic complexity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(5), 721–727.
Treiman, R., & Bourassa, D. C. (2000). The development of spelling skills. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 1–18.
Tsesmeli, S. N., & Seymour, P. H. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 587–625.
Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6), 649–667.
Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nurture of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118, 141–156.
Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (2003). Units of analysis in reading Dutch bisyllabic pseudowords. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 255–271.
Wolter, A. J., Wood, A., & D’zatko, W. K. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in School, 40(3), 286–298.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taha, H., Saiegh-Haddad, E. Morphology and Spelling in Arabic: Development and Interface. J Psycholinguist Res 46, 27–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9425-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9425-3