Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Phonological versus Morphological Skills in the Development of Arabic Spelling: An Intervention Study

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study investigated the contribution of two linguistic intervention programs, phonological and morphological to the development of word spelling among skilled and poor native Arabic readers, in three grades: second, fourth and sixth. The participants were assigned to three experimental groups: morphological intervention, phonological intervention and a non-intervention control group. Phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and spelling abilities were tested before and after the intervention. Participants from both linguistic intervention programs and in all grades made significant progress in linguistic awareness and spelling after the intervention. The results showed that both intervention programs were successful in promoting children’s spelling skills in both groups. Also, older poor readers showed a stronger response to the morphological intervention than the older skilled readers. A transfer effect was found with the phonological training contributing to the morphological skills and vice versa. The results of the current study were discussed in the light of developmental and psycholinguistic views of spelling acquisition as well as the characteristics of Arabic language and orthography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is noteworthy that the diacritic system also includes diacritics representing word-final vowels and nunation which are used to mark case as well as the grammatical function of words. This phonological information, and unlike word- internal diacritics, is only rarely needed for word identification (Holes 2004).

  2. The values of the Alpha of Chronbach are as reported in Abu-Rabia and Taha (2006).

References

  • Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Awwad, J. (2004). Morphological structures in visual word recognition: the case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(3), 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2004). Reading and spelling error analysis of native Arabic dyslexic readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 651–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2006). Phonological errors predominate in Arabic spelling across grades 1–9. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(2), 167–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (2007). The role of morphology and short vowelization in Reading Arabic of normal and dyslexic readers in Grades 3, 6, 9, and 12. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 89–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mannai, H., & Everatt, J. (2005). Phonological processing skills as predictors of literacy amongst Arabic speaking Bahraini children. Dyslexia, 11, 269–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amtmann, D., Abbott, D. R., & Berninger, W. V. (2008). Identifying and predicting classes of response to explicit phonological spelling instruction during independent composing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(3), 218–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnbak, E., & Elbro, C. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness Training on the reading and spelling skills of young dyslexics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(3), 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Dror, I., Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1995). Semantic, phonological and morphological awareness in children with reading disability and normally achieving readers: Evidence from speech perception and production. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 876–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., & Forst, R. (1995). Morphological factors in word identification in Hebrew. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 271–292). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (1999). Children’s innovative verbs versus nouns: Structured elicitations and spontaneous coinages. In L. Menn & N. Bernstein-Ratner (Eds.), Methods in studying language production (pp. 69–93). Mahhwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(2), 141–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, A. B., Fletcher, M. J., Clonan, M. S., Schatschneider, C., Francies, J. D., Shaywitze, A. B., et al. (2004). Effects of intensive reading remediation for second and third grades and 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 441–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borstrøm, I., & Elbro, C. (1997). Prevention of dyslexia in kindergarten: Effects of phoneme awareness training with children of dyslexic parents. In C. Hulme & M. Snowling (Eds.), Dyslexia : Biology, Cognition and Intervention (pp. 235–253). San Diego, Cal: Singular Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition, 81, 65–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa, S., & Gaskell, M. G. (2002). A re-examination of the default system for Arabic plurals. Language & Cognitive Processes, 17, 321–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2004). Abstract morphemes and lexical representation: The CV-Skeleton in Arabic. Cognition, 92, 271–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2005). Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 207–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa, D., & Treiman, R. (2003). Spelling in children with dyslexia: Analyses from The Treiman-Bourassa Early Spelling Test. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa, D. C., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Use of morphology in spelling by children with dyslexia and typically developing children. Memory & cognition, 34(3), 703–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics’ phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 874–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bus, A. G., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravolas, M., Kessler, B., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2005). Effects of orthographic consistency, frequency, and letter knowledge on children’s vowel spelling development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(4), 307–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24(3–4), 291–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., McBride-Chang, C., Nagy, W., & Nunes, T. (2010). Effects of Instruction in Morphological Awareness on Literacy Achievement: An Integrative Review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 464–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (2005). Modeling reading: The dual-route approach. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The Science of Reading. Oxford: Blackwells Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, P. T. (1996). The study of writing systems. In P. T. Daniels & W. Wright (Eds.), The world’s writing systems. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, H. S., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M., & Kaminska, Z. (1994). Casting a spell with witches and broomsticks: Direct and associative influences on pseudoword orthography. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M., Stuart, M., & Masterson, J. (2002). The relationship between phonological awareness and the development of orthographic representations. Reading and Writing, 15(3–4), 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, C. L., & Snowling, J. M. (2005). Developmental variations in word recognition. In C. A. Stone, R. E. Silliman, J. B. Ehren, K. Apel, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 433–460). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of Morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 246, 209–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C., & Pallesen, B. R. (2002). The quality of phonological representations: A causal link? In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Pre users of functional literacy (pp. 17–32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. W. (1993). Reading, writing and dyslexia: A cognitive analysis. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. H. (1959). Diglossia. World, 15, 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, M. J. & Denton, C. (2003). Validity of Alternative Approaches to the Identification of L.D.: Operationalizing Unexpected Underachievement. The National Research Center on Learning Disabilities: Symposium focusing on responsiveness-to-intervention, Kansas City, Missouri, December 4–5, 2003, (pp. 1–11).

  • Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marashall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301–330). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (2006). Becoming literate in Hebrew: The grain-size hypothesis and semitic orthographic systems. Developmental Science, 9(5), 439–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2006). Typological effects on spelling development: A cross linguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 33, 621–659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, G. (2000a). The efficacy of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 126–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, T. G. (2002). Follow-up study investigating the benefits of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. International Journal of Language and communication Disorders, 37(4), 381–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60(2), 183–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Phonological Skills and Learning to Read. Hove, East Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., & Richardson, U. (2005). The effects of spelling consistency on phonological awareness: A comparison of English and German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 345–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrson, E. (1985). Teaching spelling. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). The characteristics of arabic orthography slow its processing. Neuropsychology, 16(3), 322–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jimĕnez, E. J., Siegel, S. L., & Lòpez, R. M. (2003). The relationship between I.Q and reading disabilities in English- speaking Canadian and Spanish children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(1), 15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jongejan, W., Verhoeven, L., & Siegel, L. S. (2007). Predictors of reading and spelling abilities in first- and second-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 835–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, C., & Gillon, T. G. (2009). Integrated morphological awareness intervention as a tool for improving literacy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 341–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, L.-J., & Anderson, R. C. (2010). Beyond cross-language transfer: Reconceptualizing the impact of early bilingualism on phonological competence. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14(4), 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., Frith, U., & Wimmer, H. (1996). Intrusion of orthographic knowledge on phoneme awareness: Strong in normal readers, weak in dyslexic readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German–English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, C., & Siegel, L. S. (1998). Phonological and orthographic processes in good and poor readers. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 395–404). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A. (1994). The grammar of the Arabic dialect of Jerusalem. The Hebrew University Jerusalem (In Hebrew). Israel: Magness Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., Ravid, D., & Rapaport, S. (2001). Morphology and spelling among Hebrew-speaking children: From kindergarten to first grade. Journal of Child Language, 28, 741–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. C. (2002). Learning disabilities. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Child psychopathology (pp. 520–586). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, H. S. (2002). The effects of morphological versus phonological awareness training in kindergarten on reading development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3–4), 261–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. E. (1998). Longitudinal designs in randomized group comparisons: When will intermediate observations increase statistical power? Psychological Methods, 3, 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2009). The new curriculum for the teaching of the Arabic language in Israel. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from URL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Olsson, J. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2009). Children’s reading and spelling: Beyond the first steps. UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Farah, R. (1999). Learning about noun plurals in Palestinian Arabic. First Language, 19, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 459–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Malenky, D. (2001). Awareness of linear and nonlinear morphology in Hebrew: A developmental study. First Language, 21, 25–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Tolchinsky, L. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model. Journal of Child Language, 29, 419–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Schiff, R. (2006). Roots and patterns in Hebrew language development: Evidence from written morphological analogies. Reading and Writing, 19, 789–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2012). Spelling Hebrew: The psycholinguistic of Hebrew spelling. NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, A. A., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., Wade-Woolley, L., & Deacon, S. H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in Grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 96–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. & Ali, Y. (2012). A corpus linguistic study of the lexicon of five-year-old Arabic native speaking children. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. & Taha, H. (2012). Linguistic intervention and the development of reading skills in Arabic. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2012). A tale of one letter: Orthographic regularity and morphological status in Arabic spelling. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Joshi, M. (2012). A Handbook of Arabic Literacy. Handbook in preparation.

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., Hadieh, A., Ravid, D. (2012). Acquiring noun plurals in Arabic: Morphology, familiarity and pattern frequency. Manuscript in press. Language Learning.

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistic, 24, 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistic, 25, 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 559–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Epilinguistic and metalinguistic phonological awareness may be subject to different constraints: Evidence from Hebrew. First Language, 27(4), 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English-Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2011a). Literacy reflexes of Arabic diglossia. In M. Leikin, M. Schwartz, & Y. Tobin (Eds.), Current issues in bilingualism: Cognitive and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 43–55). The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2011b). Phonological processing in diglossic Arabic: The role of Linguistic distance. In E. Broselow & H. Ouli (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics (pp. 269–280). Cambridge, UK: John Benjamins Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., Levin, I., Hende, N., & Ziv, M. (2011c). The Linguistic affiliation constraint and phoneme recognition in diglossic Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 38, 297–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2004). Vowel representation in written Hebrew: Phonological, orthographic and morphological contexts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Ennemoser, M., Roth, E., & Kuspert, P. (1999). Kindergarten prevention of dyslexia: Does training in phonological awareness work for everybody? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 429–436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Ennemoser, Marco, Roth, Ellen, & Kuspert, Petra. (1999). Kindergarten prevention of dyslexia: Does training in phonological awareness work for everybody? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(5), 429–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sénéchal, M. (2000). Morphological effects in children’s spelling of words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 76–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sénéchal, M., Basque, T. M., & Leclaire, T. (2006). Morphological knowledge as revealed in children’s spelling accuracy and reports of spelling strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 231–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self - teaching: Sine qua none of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing, 12(3), 219–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., & Goulandris, N. (1994). Word recognition in developmental dyslexia: A connectionist interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 895–916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J. (2000). Language and literacy skills. Who is at risk and why? In D. V. M. Bishop & L. C. Leonard (Eds.), Speech and language impairments: From research to practice. Philadelphia, USA: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J. (2001). From language to reading and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7, 37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Béchennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading and in spelling: A four year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 194–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steffler, J. D. (2001). Implicit cognition and spelling development. Developmental Review, 21, 168–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taha, H. & Saiegh-Haddad. (2012). Morphology and spelling in Arabic: Development and interface. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Taha, H. Y. (2013). Reading and spelling in Arabic: Linguistic and orthographic complexity. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 3(5), 721–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Bourassa, D. C. (2000). The development of spelling skills. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsesmeli, S. N., & Seymour, P. H. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 19, 587–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsesmeli, S. N., & Seymour, P. H. K. (2009). The effects of training of morphological structure on spelling derived words by dyslexic adolescents. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 565–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nurture of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118, 141–156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of zchild Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 45(1), 2–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, J. A., Wood, A., & D’zatko, K. W. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(3), 286–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Anderson, C. R., Li, H., Dong, Q., Wu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2010). Cross-language transfer of insight into the structure of compound words. Reading and Writing, 23(3–4), 311–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological bulletin, 131(1), 3–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., et al. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21(4), 551–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Cognitive Lab for Reading and Learning and the Special Education Department, Sakhnin College for Teachers’ Education, Sakhnin, Israel

    Haitham Taha

  2. Linguistics Division, English Department, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel

    Elinor Saiegh-Haddad

Authors
  1. Haitham Taha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elinor Saiegh-Haddad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haitham Taha.

Appendix

Appendix

See (Table 4).

Table 4 Total number of participants and mean age within each intervention group separately by grade and reading group
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taha, H., Saiegh-Haddad, E. The Role of Phonological versus Morphological Skills in the Development of Arabic Spelling: An Intervention Study. J Psycholinguist Res 45, 507–535 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9362-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9362-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation