Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 287–307 | Cite as

Acquisition and Use of Linguistic Knowledge: Scrambling in Child Japanese as a Test Case

Article
  • 205 Downloads

Abstract

The current study investigates preschool-age children’s comprehension of scrambled sentences in Japanese. While scrambling has been known to be challenging for children, biasing them to exhibit non-adult-like interpretations (e.g., Hayashibe in Descr Appl Linguist 8:1–18, 1975; Sano in Descr Appl Linguist 10:213–233, 1977; Suzuki in Jpn J Educ Psychol 25(3):56–61, 1977), children are able to interpret scrambled sentences in an adult-like way when the pragmatics is enriched in the experiments (Otsu in Acquisition studies in generative grammar, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 253–264, 1994). These findings suggest that children’s difficulty in comprehending scrambling may be due to processing difficulties (Suzuki in J Psycholinguist Res 42(2), 119–137, 2013), such as the Lexical-ordering Strategy bias (Bever in Cognition and language development, Wiley, New York, pp 279–352, 1970), rather than their lack of the linguistic knowledge of scrambling. The current study revealed that children are indeed able to utilize prosodic information to interpret scrambled sentences in an adult-like way. Our findings provide converging evidence in favor of the proposal that children’s grammatical knowledge of scrambling is intact, although they are more vulnerable than adults to processing difficulties that hinder their ability to successfully interpret scrambled sentences.

Keywords

Scrambling Prosody Child Japanese 

References

  1. Aoshima, S., Phillips, C., & Weinberg, A. (2004). Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bever, T. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and language development (pp. 279–352). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.4.04, http://www.praat.org/.
  4. Chujo, K. (1983). The interrelationships among strategies for sentence comprehension. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 54(4), 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cutler, A., & Swinney, D. A. (1987). Prosody and the development of comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 14(1), 145–167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahan, D., & Bernard, J.-M. (1996). Interspeaker variability in emphatic accent production in French. Language & Speech, 39(4), 341–374.Google Scholar
  7. Grassman, S., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Prosodic stress on a word directs 24-month-olds’ attention to a contextually new referent. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 3098–3105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gualmini, A., Maciukaite, S., & Crain, S. (2003). Children’s insensitivity to contrastive stress in sentences with ONLY. In S. Arunachalam, E. Kaiser, & A. Williams (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th annual Penn linguistics colloquium (pp. 87–110). http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol8/iss1/
  9. Hale, K. (1980). Remarks on Japanese phrase structure: Comments on the papers on Japanese syntax. In Y. Otsu & A. Farmer (Eds.), MIT working papers in linguistics 2 (pp. 185–203). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  10. Hayashibe, H. (1975). Word order and particles: A developmental study in Japanese. Descriptive and Applied Linguistics, 8, 1–18.Google Scholar
  11. Hoji, H. (1985). Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
  12. Ito, K., Jincho, N., Minai, U., Yamane, N., & Mazuka, R. (2012). Intonation facilitates contrast resolution: Evidence from Japanese adults and 6-year-olds. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(1), 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuroda, S.-Y. (1980). Bun no kozo [The structure of sentences]. In T. Kunihiro (Ed.), Nichi-ei hikaku koza II: bunpo [Japanese-English comparative study II: grammar] (pp. 23–62). Tokyo, Japan: Taishukan.Google Scholar
  14. Lidz, J. (2011). Parser-grammar interactions in the acquisition of syntax. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics (pp. 17–44). Tokyo, Japan: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
  15. Maratsos, M. P. (1973). The effects of stress on the understanding of pronominal co-reference in children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(1), 1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Masunaga, K. (1983). Bridging. In S. Hattori & K. Inoue (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth international congress of linguists (pp. 455–460). Tokyo, Japan: Proceedings Publishing Committee.Google Scholar
  17. Matsumoto, Y. (1993). The Japanese numeral classifiers: A study of semantic categories and lexical organization. Linguistics, 31(4), 667–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., & Kondo, T. (2002). Cost of scrambling in Japanese sentence processing. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Sentence processing in East Asian languages (pp. 131–166). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Mazuka, R., Jincho, N., & Oishi, H. (2009). Development of executive control and language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller, K., Chang, H.-H., Schmitt, C., & Munn, A. (2005). Children understand some implicatures. In A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), BUCLD 29: Proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 389–400). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  21. Minai, U., Jincho, N., Yamane, N., & Mazuka, R. (2012). What hinders child semantic computation: Children’s universal quantification and the development of cognitive control. Journal of Child Language, 39(5), 919–956.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Miyagawa, S. (1980). Complex verbs and the Lexicon. Tucson: University of Arizona. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
  23. Miyamoto, E. T., & Takahashi, S. (2004). Filler-gap dependencies in the processing of scrambling in Japanese. Language and Linguistics, 5(1), 153–166.Google Scholar
  24. Murasugi, K., & Kawamura, T. (2005). On the acquisition of scrambling. In J. Sabel & M. Saito (Eds.), The free word order phenomenon: Its syntactic sources and diversity (pp. 221–242). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  25. Otsu, Y. (1994). Early acquisition of scrambling in Japanese. In T. Hoekstra & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 253–264). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pierrehumbert, J., & Beckman, M. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Saito, M. (1985). Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
  28. Sano, K. (1977). An experimental study on the acquisition of Japanese simple sentences and cleft sentences. Descriptive and Applied Linguistics, 10, 213–233.Google Scholar
  29. Sano, T. (2007). Early acquisition of copy & movement in a Japanese OSV sentence. In H. Caunt-Nulton, S. Kulatilake, & I. Woo (Eds.), BUCLD 31 Online Proceedings Supplement. http://www.bu.edu/bucld/proceedings/supplement/vol31/
  30. Slobin, D., & Bever, T. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12(3), 229–265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Solan, L. (1980). Contrastive stress and children’s interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23(3), 688–698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Speer, S., & Ito, K. (2009). Prosody in first language acquisition—Acquiring intonation as a tool to organize information in conversation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 90–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Suzuki, S. (1977). Nihon no yoji ni okeru gojun horyaku [Word-order strategy by Japanese children]. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(3), 56–61.Google Scholar
  34. Suzuki, T. (2013). Children’s on-line processing of scrambling in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42(2), 119–137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tamaoka, K., Sakai, H., Kawahara, J., Miyaoka, Y., Lim, H., & Koizumi, M. (2005). Priority information used for the processing of Japanese sentences: Thematic roles, case particles or grammatical functions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(3), 281–332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Training Center for Foreign Languages and DictionTokyo University of the ArtsTaito-ku, TokyoJapan
  3. 3.College of LawNihon UniversityChiyoda-ku, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations