Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 164–203.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 321–338.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain (pp. 95–126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1411–1423.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, M. (1959). On methods in the analyses of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112.
Article
Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, K., & Ishihara, S. (2012). Syntactic metamorphosis: Clefts, slicing, and in-situ focus in Japanese. Syntax, 15(2), 142–180.
Article
Google Scholar
Ishizuka, T., Nakatani, K., Gibson, E. (2006). Processing Japanese relative clause in context. Paper presented at the 19th annual CUNY conference on Human Sentence Processing, CUNY.
Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371–375.
Google Scholar
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processess, 15(2), 159–201.
Article
Google Scholar
Kahraman, B., Sato, A., Ono, H., Sakai, H. (2011a) Incremental processing of gap-filler dependencies: Evidence from the processing of subject and object clefts in Japanese. The Proceeding of the Twelfth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 113–147.
Kahraman, B., Sato, A., Ono, H., & Sakai, H. (2011b). Why object clefts are easier to process than subject clefts in Japanese: Frequency or expectation? Technical Report of IECIE, 111(170), 67–72.
Google Scholar
Miyamoto, E. T., & Nakamura, M. (2003). Subject/object asymmetries in the processing of relative clauses in Japanese. In G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (Eds.), Proceedings of 22nd West Coast conference on formal linguistic (pp. 342–355). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Google Scholar
O’Grady, W. (1997). Syntactic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Oldfield, R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Abada, S. (2005). ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long distance dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 407–428.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Thompson, S. P., & Newport, E. L. (2007). Statistical learning of syntax: The role of transitional probability. Language Learning and Development, 3(1), 1–42.
Article
Google Scholar
Ueno, M., & Garnsey, S. M. (2008). An ERP study of subject and object relative clauses in Japanese. Language and Cognitive Process, 23(5), 646–688.
Article
Google Scholar