Abstract
Event-related potential studies on second language processing reveal that L1/L2 differences are due either to proficiency, age of acquisition or grammatical differences between L1 and L2 (Kotz in Brain Lang 109(2–3):68–74, 2009). However, the relative impact of these and other factors in second language processing is still not well understood. Here we present evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments on Basque sentence word order processing by L1Spanish–L2Basque early bilinguals (Age of Aquisition \(=\) 3 years) with very high proficiency in their L2. Results reveal that these L2 speakers have a preference towards canonical Subject–Object–Verb word order, which they processed faster and with greater ease than non-canonical Object–Subject–Verb. This result converges with the processing preferences shown by natives and reported in Erdocia et al. (Brain Lang 109(1):1–17, 2009). However, electrophysiological measures associated to canonical (SOV) and non-canonical (OSV) sentences revealed a different pattern in the non-natives, as compared to that reported previously for natives. The non-native group elicited a P600 component that native group did not show when comparing S and O at sentence’s second position. This pattern of results suggests that, despite high proficiency, non-native language processing recruits neural resources that are different from those employed in native languages.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Beyond syntax: Language-related positivities reflect the revision of hierarchies. NeuroReport, 13, 361–364.
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2009). The role of prominence information in the real-time comprehension of transitive constructions: A cross-linguistic approach. Language and Linguistic Compass, 3(1), 19–58.
Carreiras, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Vergara, M., de la Cruz-Pavía, I., & Laka, I. (2010). Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque. Cognition, 115, 79–92.
Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P. (2007). ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(2), 161–174.
Díaz, B., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Erdocia, K., Mueller, J., & Laka, I. (2011). On the cross-linguistic validity of electrophysiological correlates of morphosyntactic processing: A study of case and agreement violations in Basque. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 357–373.
Dixon, R. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge studies in linguistics (69). UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dryer, M. S. (2011). Order of subject, object and verb. In: M. S. Dryer, M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. http://wals.info/chapter/81.
Erdocia, K., Laka, I., Mestres-Missé, A., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2009). Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolution in a free word order language: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque. Brain and Language, 109(1), 1–17.
Felser, C., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. (2003). Storage and integration in processing of filler-gap dependencies: An ERP study of topicalization and wh-movement in German. Brain and Language, 87, 345–445.
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012). Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 226–248.
Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Separating syntactic integration cost during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 250–272.
Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Saddy, D. (2002). Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(1), 45–63.
Frisch, S., & Schlesewsky, M. (2001). The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing. Basic and Clinical Neurophysiology, 12, 3391–3394.
Frisch, S., Schelewsky, M., Saddy, D., & Alpermann, A. (2002). The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity. Cognition, 85, B83–B92.
Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58–93.
Gibson, E., & Hickok, G. (1993). Sentence processing with empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 147–161.
Gibson, E., Piantadosi, S. E., Brink, K., Bergen, L., Lim, E., & Saxe, R. (2013). A noisy-channel account of crosslinguistic word-order variation. Psychological Science, 24, 1079–1088.
Gillon Dowens, M., Vergara, M., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1870–1887.
Gillon Dowens, M., Guo, T., Guo, J., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish—Evidence from event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1651–1659.
Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In: J. H. Greenberg JH (Ed.) Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Second printing, first paperback edition. 1966 (pp. 73–113).
Hagiwara, H., Soshi, T., Ishihara, M., & Imanaka, K. (2007). A topographical study on the event-related potential correlates of scrambled word order in Japanese complex sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(2), 175–193.
Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1531–1549.
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Osterghout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 273–316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. (2004). Integration of word meaning and word knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438–441.
Hawkins, J. A. (1995). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, J. A. (1999). Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language, 75(2), 244–85.
Hawkins, J. A. (2004). Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hawkins, J. A., Dryer, M. S., Haspelmath, M., Newmeyer, F. J., Polinsky, M., & Primus, B. (2002). Symmetries and asymmetries: Their grammar, typology and parsing. Theoretical Linguistics, 28, 95–149.
Just, M., Carpenter, P., & Wooley, J. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, I, 11, 228–238.
Johns, A., Massam, D., & Ndayiragije, J. (Eds.). (2006). Ergativity: Emerging issues. Studies in natural language and linguistic theory (Vol. 65). Dordrecht, Berlin: Springer.
Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. (2003). Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: A comparison between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 621–635.
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as and index of syntactic integration difficulty. Langauge and Cogntive Processes, 15, 159–201.
Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205–225.
Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(2), 196–214.
Kotz, S. (2009). A critical review of ERP and fMRI evidence on L2 syntactic processing. Brain and Language, 109(2–3), 68–74.
Kuperberg, G., Holcomb, P., Sitnikova, T., Greve, D., Dale, A., & Caplan, D. (2003). Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(2), 272–293.
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.
Landa, J., Sarasola, I., & Salaburu, P. (2011). Euskal Hiztegiaren Maiztasun Egitura (EHME), Euskara Institutua/Basque Language Institute. Bilbao: University of the Basque Country. ISBN 978-84-693-9890-6.
Matzke, M., Mai, H., Nager, W., Rüsseler, J., & Münte, T. (2002). The cost of freedom: An ERP-study of non-canonical sentences. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 844–852.
McLaughlin, J., Tanner, D., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., Inoue, K., Valentine, G., et al. (2010). Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60(2), 123–150.
Münte, T., Heinze, H. J., & Mangun, G. (1993). Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(3), 335–344.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
Ojima, S., Nakata, H., & Kakigi, R. (2005). An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: Effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 1212–1228.
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 167–174.
Pallier, C., Dupoux, E., & Jeannin, X. (1997). EXPE: An expandable programming language for on line psychological experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 29(3), 322–327.
Pastor, L., & Laka, I. (2013). Processing facilitation strategies in OV and VO languages: A corpus study. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3(3), 252–258.
Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Abada, S. H. (2005). ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 407–428.
Pickering, M. (1993). Direct association and sentence processing: A reply to Gorrell and to Gibson and Hickok. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 163–196.
Pickering, M., & Barry, G. (1991). Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 229–259.
Rossi, S., Gugler, M., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (2006). The impact of proficiency on second language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 2030–2048.
Rösler, F., Pechmann, T., Streb, J., Röder, B., & Hennighausen, E. (1998). Parsing of sentences in a language with varying word order: Word-by-word variations of processing demands are revealed by even-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 150–176.
Sabourin, L., & Stowe, L. (2008). Second language processing: When are first and second languages processed similarly? Second Language Research, 24(3), 397–430.
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 173–204.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference form garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19(3), 528–553.
Ueno, M., & Polinsky, M. (2009). Does headedness affect processing? A new look at the VO-OV contrast. Journal of Linguistics, 45, 675–710.
van Hell, J., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26(1), 43–74.
Weber, K., & Lavric, A. (2008). Syntactic anomaly elicits a lexico-semantic (N400) ERP effect in the second language but not the first. Psychophysiology, 45, 920–925.
Yamashita, H., & Chang, F. (2001). “Long before short” preference in the production of a head-final language. Cognition, 81, B45–B55.
Yetano, I., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Laka, I. (2011). Agent-initial processing preference in Basque: A visual-world eye-movement experiment. Poster presented at the 7th international morphological processing conference, BCBL, Donostia-San Sebastian.
Zawiszewski, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2009). Processing object-verb agreement in canonical and non-canonical word orders in Basque: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 1284, 161–179.
Zawiszewski, A., Gutiérrez, E., Fernández, B., & Laka, I. (2011). Age effects in non-native language processing. Evidence from event-related potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 400–411.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (BRAINGLOT CSD2007-00012/CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010); the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (FFI2010-20472, FFI2012-31360); the Basque Government, Department of Education, Universities and Research (IT665-13); the University of the Basque Country (EHUA13/39); a Juan de la Cierva Fellowship (JCI-2010-07692) to Zawiszewski; and a Ramón y Cajal Fellowship (RYC-2010-06520) to Erdocia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Kepa Erdocia and Adam Zawiszewski have contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erdocia, K., Zawiszewski, A. & Laka, I. Word Order Processing in a Second Language: From VO to OV. J Psycholinguist Res 43, 815–837 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9280-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9280-4