Abstract
In two self-paced, sentence-by-sentence reading experiments, we examined the difference in the processing of Spanish discourses containing overt and null pronouns. In both experiments, antecedents appeared in a single phrase (John met Mary) or in a conjoined phrase (John and Mary met). In Experiment 1, we compared reading times of sentences containing singular overt and null pronouns referring to the first or to the second mentioned antecedent. Overt pronouns caused a processing delay relative to null pronouns when they referred to the first antecedent in single but not in conjoined phrases. In Experiment 2, we compared reading times of sentences containing overt and null pronouns referring to singular or plural entities. Plural null pronouns were read faster than their singular counterparts in conjoined conditions. Plural overt pronouns were read more slowly than their null counterparts both in single and conjoined conditions. We explain our findings in a framework based on the notion of balance between processing cost and discourse function in line with the Informational Load Hypothesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht, J., & Clifton, C, Jr. (1998). Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases. Memory & Cognition, 26(3), 599–610.
Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106, 748–765.
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London, New York: Routledge.
Barker, C. (1992). Group terms in English: Representing groups as atoms. Journal of Semantics, 9, 69–93.
Carreiras, M., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Villa, V. (1995). The advantage of first-mention in Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 124–129.
Carreiras, M. (1997). Plural pronouns and the representation of their antecedents. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 53–87.
Chambers, C., & Smyth, R. (1998). Structural parallelism and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 593–6081.
Crawley, R., Stevenson, R., & Kleinman, D. (1990). The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 245–264.
Eschenbach, C., Habel, C., Herweg, M., & Rehkamper, K. (1989). Remarks on plural anaphora. In Proceedings of the 4th conference of European chapter of the association for computational linguistics, pp. 161–167. U Manchester.
Frederiksen, J. (1981). Understanding anaphora: Rules used by readers in assigning pronominal referents. Discourse Processes, 4, 323–347.
Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. J. (1982). The mental representation of discourse in a focused memory system: Implications for the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases. Journal of Semantics, 1, 21–41.
Gelormini-Lezama, C., & Almor, A. (2011). Repeated names, overt pronouns, and null pronouns in Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(3), 437–454.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32, 99–156.
Givon, T. (1987). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311–347.
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Ledoux, K., & Yang, C. L. (1999). Processing of reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 353–379.
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Foster, K. (2000). Language comprehension and probe-list memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 766–775.
Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1983). Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. In Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. Cambridge, MA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21, 203–226.
Halliday, M. A., & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
Koh, S., & Clifton, C. (2002). Resolution of the antecedent of a plural pronoun: Ontological categories and predicate summary. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 830–844.
Moxey, L. M., Sanford, A. J., Wood, A. I., & Gintner, L. M. N. (2011). When do we use “They” to refer to two individuals? Scenario-mapping as a basis for equivalence. Language and cognitive processes.
Moxey, L. M., Sanford, A. J., Sturt, P., & Murrow, L. I. (2004). Constraints on the formation of plural reference objects: The influence of role, conjunction and type of description. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 346–364.
Prince, E. F. (1978). A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language, 34, 883–906.
Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1981). Understanding written language. Chichester, England: Wiley.
Sanford, A. J., & Moxey, L. M. (1995). Notes on plural reference and the scenario-mapping principle in comprehension. In C. Habel & G. Rickheit (Eds.), Focus and cohesion in discourse. Berlin: de Gruyter.
van-Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gelormini-Lezama, C., Almor, A. Singular and Plural Pronominal Reference in Spanish. J Psycholinguist Res 43, 299–313 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9254-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9254-6