Skip to main content
Log in

Singular and Plural Pronominal Reference in Spanish

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In two self-paced, sentence-by-sentence reading experiments, we examined the difference in the processing of Spanish discourses containing overt and null pronouns. In both experiments, antecedents appeared in a single phrase (John met Mary) or in a conjoined phrase (John and Mary met). In Experiment 1, we compared reading times of sentences containing singular overt and null pronouns referring to the first or to the second mentioned antecedent. Overt pronouns caused a processing delay relative to null pronouns when they referred to the first antecedent in single but not in conjoined phrases. In Experiment 2, we compared reading times of sentences containing overt and null pronouns referring to singular or plural entities. Plural null pronouns were read faster than their singular counterparts in conjoined conditions. Plural overt pronouns were read more slowly than their null counterparts both in single and conjoined conditions. We explain our findings in a framework based on the notion of balance between processing cost and discourse function in line with the Informational Load Hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht, J., & Clifton, C, Jr. (1998). Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases. Memory & Cognition, 26(3), 599–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106, 748–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, C. (1992). Group terms in English: Representing groups as atoms. Journal of Semantics, 9, 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras, M., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Villa, V. (1995). The advantage of first-mention in Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras, M. (1997). Plural pronouns and the representation of their antecedents. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 53–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, C., & Smyth, R. (1998). Structural parallelism and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 593–6081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, R., Stevenson, R., & Kleinman, D. (1990). The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eschenbach, C., Habel, C., Herweg, M., & Rehkamper, K. (1989). Remarks on plural anaphora. In Proceedings of the 4th conference of European chapter of the association for computational linguistics, pp. 161–167. U Manchester.

  • Frederiksen, J. (1981). Understanding anaphora: Rules used by readers in assigning pronominal referents. Discourse Processes, 4, 323–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. J. (1982). The mental representation of discourse in a focused memory system: Implications for the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases. Journal of Semantics, 1, 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelormini-Lezama, C., & Almor, A. (2011). Repeated names, overt pronouns, and null pronouns in Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(3), 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32, 99–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Givon, T. (1987). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Ledoux, K., & Yang, C. L. (1999). Processing of reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 353–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Foster, K. (2000). Language comprehension and probe-list memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 766–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1983). Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. In Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. Cambridge, MA: Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21, 203–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A., & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, S., & Clifton, C. (2002). Resolution of the antecedent of a plural pronoun: Ontological categories and predicate summary. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 830–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moxey, L. M., Sanford, A. J., Wood, A. I., & Gintner, L. M. N. (2011). When do we use “They” to refer to two individuals? Scenario-mapping as a basis for equivalence. Language and cognitive processes.

  • Moxey, L. M., Sanford, A. J., Sturt, P., & Murrow, L. I. (2004). Constraints on the formation of plural reference objects: The influence of role, conjunction and type of description. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 346–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, E. F. (1978). A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language, 34, 883–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1981). Understanding written language. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, A. J., & Moxey, L. M. (1995). Notes on plural reference and the scenario-mapping principle in comprehension. In C. Habel & G. Rickheit (Eds.), Focus and cohesion in discourse. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • van-Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Gelormini-Lezama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gelormini-Lezama, C., Almor, A. Singular and Plural Pronominal Reference in Spanish. J Psycholinguist Res 43, 299–313 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9254-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9254-6

Keywords

Navigation