Abstract
There has been an increasing volume of evidence supporting the role of the syllable in word processing tasks. Recently it has also been shown that orthographic redundancy, related to the pattern of bigram frequencies, could not explain the syllable number effect on lexical decision times. This was demonstrated on a large sample of words taken from the British Lexicon Project. In this study we extend this research by examining both lexical decision and word naming times taken from the English Lexicon Project . There was a syllable number effect for both tasks in the expected direction, and this effect was independent of the presence of a bigram trough. The research also examined the role of other bigram related variables and the number of morphemes on lexical decision and word naming times. The number of morphemes had a significant effect on both word processing tasks, with words with more morphemes producing faster reaction times and also fewer errors. This pattern was reversed for nonword lexical decision times. The results are discussed in the light of recent developments in models of reading.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. W., Stone, M., Vincent, R. D., & Muncer, S. J. (2011). The role of syllables in anagram solution: A Rasch analysis. The Journal of General Psychology, 138(2), 1–15.
Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2012). The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 920–948.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283–316.
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., et al. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459.
Bryant, P., Nunes, T., & Bindman, M. (1997). Children’s understanding of the connection between grammar and spelling. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations o f reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 219–240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 979–990.
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.
Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C. J., & De Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–780.
Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., Tamm, S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Syllables and bigrams: Orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect word recognition at different processing levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 461–479.
Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2013). Seeing stems everywhere: Position-independent identification of stem morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 510–525
Doignon, N., & Zagar, D. (2005). Illusory conjunctions in French: The nature of sublexical units in visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 443–464.
Doignon-Camus, N., Zagar, D., & Mathey, S. (2009). Can we see syllables in monosyllabic words? A study with illusory conjunctions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 599–614.
Ferrand, L., & New, B. (2002). Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. Acta Psychologica, 113, 167–183.
Fitzsimmons, G., & Drieghe, D. (2011). The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 736–741.
Ford, A., & Singh, R. (1991). Propedeutique morphologique. Folia Linguistica, 25, 549–575.
Ford, M. A., Davis, M. H., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2010). Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 117–130.
Forster, K. L., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 12, 627–635.
Fowler, A. E., & Liberman, I. Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13(3), 241–255.
Fudge, E. (1984). English Word Stress. London: Allen & Unwin.
Goldsmith, J. (2001). Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. Computational Linguistics, 27(2), 153–198.
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Language Sciences. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054.
Harris, Z. S. (1955). From phoneme to morpheme. Language, 31, 190–222.
Kandel, S., Peereman, R., Grosjacques, G., & Fayol, M. (2011). For a psycholinguistic model of handwriting production: Testing the syllable-bigram controversy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 92–105.
Keuleers, M., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British lexicon project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 287–304.
Knight, D., & Muncer, S. J. (2011). Type and token bigram frequencies for two-through nine letter words and the prediction of anagram difficulty. Behaviour Research Methods, 43(2), 491–498.
Macizo, P., & Van Petten, C. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20, 295–331.
Muncer, S. J., & Jandreau, S. (1984). Morphemes, syllables, words and reading. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59(1), 14–15.
Muncer, S. J., & Knight, D. C. (2011). The syllable effect in anagram solution: Unrecognised evidence from past studies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40, 111–118.
Muncer, S. J., & Knight, D. (2012). The bigram trough and the syllable number effect in lexical decision. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.697176.
Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Pscyhology, 98(1), 134–147.
Napps, S. E. (1989). Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships. Memory & Cognition, 17(6), 729–739.
Neuvel, S., & Fulop, S. A. (2002). Unsupervised learning of morphology without morphemes. ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology (SIGPHON), Philadelphia, Morphological and phonological learning: proceedings of the 6th workshop of the association for, computational linguistics pp. 31–40.
New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence form the English lexicon project. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(1), 45–52.
Novick, L. R., & Sherman, S. J. (2008). The effects of superficial and structural information on on-line problems solving for good versus poor anagram solvers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1098–1120.
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61(2), 106–151.
Prinzmetal, W., Trieman, R., & Rho, S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 461–475.
Rapp, B. (1992). The nature of sub-lexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 33–53.
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 342–364.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098.
Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26(6), 1270–1281.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Colteart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 245–263). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Singson, M., Mahoney, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relationship between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219–252.
Solso, R. L., & Juel, C. L. (1980). Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two- through nine-letter English words. Behaviour Research Methods, 12, 297–343.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage retrieval for prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647.
Treiman, R., Mullenix, J., Bijelac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107–136.
Vannest, J., Newport, E. L., Newman, A. J., & Bavelier, D. (2011). Interplay between morphology and frequency in lexical access: The case of the base frequency effect. Brain Research, 1373, 144–159.
Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 502–509.
Yap, Y., Tan, S. E., & Pexman, P. M. (2011). Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 742–750.
Yarkoni, T., Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We thank Prof. Marc Brysbaert for discussion and some very helpful advice on a number of ideas presented here, and also Prof. Keuleers for emphasising the importance of considering the role of morphemes in this context.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muncer, S.J., Knight, D. & Adams, J.W. Bigram Frequency, Number of Syllables and Morphemes and Their Effects on Lexical Decision and Word Naming. J Psycholinguist Res 43, 241–254 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9252-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9252-8