Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 167–185 | Cite as

Pre- and Post-head Processing for Single- and Double-Scrambled Sentences of a Head-Final Language as Measured by the Eye Tracking Method

  • Katsuo Tamaoka
  • Michiko Asano
  • Yayoi Miyaoka
  • Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Article

Abstract

Using the eye-tracking method, the present study depicted pre- and post-head processing for simple scrambled sentences of head-final languages. Three versions of simple Japanese active sentences with ditransitive verbs were used: namely, (1) \(\text{ SO }_{\!1\!}\text{ O }_{\!2\!}\text{ V }\) canonical, (2) \(\text{ SO }_{\!2\!}\text{ O }_{\!1\!}\text{ V }\) single-scrambled, and (3) \(\text{ O }_{\!1\!}\text{ O }_{\!2\!}\text{ SV }\) double-scrambled order. First pass reading times indicated that the third noun phrase just before the verb in both single- and double-scrambled sentences required longer reading times compared to canonical sentences. Re-reading times (the sum of all fixations minus the first pass reading) showed that all noun phrases including the crucial phrase before the verb in double-scrambled sentences required longer re-reading times than those required for single-scrambled sentences; single-scrambled sentences had no difference from canonical ones. Therefore, a single filler-gap dependency can be resolved in pre-head anticipatory processing whereas two filler-gap dependencies require much greater cognitive loading than a single case. These two dependencies can be resolved in post-head processing using verb agreement information.

Keywords

Head-final language Gap-filling parsing Scrambling  Pre-head and post-head processing Eye-tracking 

References

  1. Aoshima, S., Phillips, C., & Weinberg, A. (2004). Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crain, S., & Forder, J. D. (1985). How can grammars help parsers? In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing (pp. 94–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Farmer, A. (1984). Modularity in syntax: A study of Japanese and English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G., & Garrett, M. F. (1974). The psychology of language. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Frazier, L. (1987). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 519–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C, Jr. (1989). Identifying gaps in English sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 93–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frazier, L., & Flores D’Arcais, G. B. (1989). Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gair, W. J. (1998). Syntax: Configuration, order, and grammatical function. In: B.C. Lust (Ed.), Studies in South Asian linguistics; Sinhala and other South Asian languages (pp. 47–110). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hale, K. (1980). Remarks on Japanese phrase structure: Comments on the papers on Japanese syntax. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 185–203.Google Scholar
  12. Hale, K. (1982). Preliminary remarks on configurationality. North East Linguistic Society, 12, 86–96.Google Scholar
  13. Hale, K. (1983). Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1, 5–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 417–429.Google Scholar
  15. Hoji, H. (1985). Logical form constraints and configurational structure in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, Seattle, USA: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  16. Hoji, H. (1987). Week crossover and Japanese phrase structure. In T. Imai & M. Saito (Eds.), Issues in Japanese linguistics (pp. 163–201). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
  17. Inoue, M., & Den, Y. (1999). Influence of verb-predictability on ambiguity resolution in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on cognitive science and the 16th annual meeting of the Japanese cognitive science society joint conference, pp. 499–502.Google Scholar
  18. Inoue, A., & Fodor, J. D. (1995). Information-paced parsing of Japanese. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing (pp. 9–63). Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). Prediction and thematic information in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamide, Y., & Mitchell, D. C. (1999). Incremental pre-head attachment in Japanese parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5/6), 631–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koizumi, M., & Tamaoka, K. (2004). Cognitive processing of Japanese sentences with ditransitive verbs. Gengo Kenkyu (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan), 125, 173–190.Google Scholar
  22. Koizumi, M., & Tamaoka, K. (2010). Psycholinguistic evidence for the VP-internal subject position in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry, 41, 663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewis, R. (1996). Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 93–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., & Kondo, T. (2002). Cost of scrambling in Japanese sentence processing. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Sentence processing in East-Asian languages (pp. 131–166). Stanford, CA: CSLI (Center for the Study of Language and Information).Google Scholar
  25. McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 578–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miyagawa, S. (1989). Structure and case marking in Japanese: Syntax and semantics. Vol. 22. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Miyagawa, S. (2010). Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse configurational languages (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Miyagishi, T. (2003). Shinharago no dakkaku/gukaku meishi to dooshi no musubitsuki relationship between ablative/instrumental case nouns. Yasuda Joshi Daigaku Kiyoo Yasuda Women’s University Bulletin, 31, 1–26.Google Scholar
  29. Miyamoto, E., & Takahashi, S. (2002). The processing of wh-phrases and interrogative complementizers in Japanese. In N. Akatuka & S. Strauss (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics (Vol. 10, pp. 62–75). Stanford, CA: CSLI (Center for the Study of Language and Information),Google Scholar
  30. Miyamoto, E., & Takahashi, S. (2004). Filler-gap dependencies in the processing of scrambling in Japanese. Language and Linguistics, 5, 153–166.Google Scholar
  31. Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 667–682.Google Scholar
  32. Nakayama, M. (1995). Scrambling and probe recognition. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing (pp. 257–273). Hillsdale, HJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Pritchett, B. L. (1991). Head position and parsing ambiguity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(3), 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rayner, K., & Fischer, M. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 734–747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ross, J.-R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  38. Saito, M. (1985). Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  39. Saito, M., & Hoji, H. (1983). Weak cross-over and move \(\alpha \) in Japanese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 327–342). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Stowe, L. (1986). Parsing wh-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tamaoka, K., Sakai, H., Kawahara, J., Miyaoka, Y., Lim, H., & Koizumi, M. (2005). Priority information used for the processing of Japanese sentences: Thematic roles, case particles or grammatical functions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 273–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ueno, M., & Kluender, R. (2003). Event-related brain indices of Japanese scrambling. Brain and Language, 86, 243–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vitu, F., McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1998). About regressive saccades in reading and their relation to word identification. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yamashita, H. (1997). The effects of word-order and case marking information on the processing of Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katsuo Tamaoka
    • 1
  • Michiko Asano
    • 2
  • Yayoi Miyaoka
    • 3
  • Kazuhiko Yokosawa
    • 4
  1. 1.Nagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Keio UniversityFujisawaJapan
  3. 3.Hiroshima University of EconomicsHiroshimaJapan
  4. 4.The University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations