Abstract
The aim of this research is to compare the types and functions of repetitions in two different corpora, one constituted of verbal interactions between adults and multiply-handicapped adolescents, the other between adults and young children of the same mental age as the adolescents. Our overall aim is to observe whether the communicative (linguistic and pragmatic) behaviour of adults varies according to the interlocutor and, if it does vary, in what ways. The main results show that adults do not use repetition strategy with the same aims according to the interlocutor. When interacting with a child, repetitions form part of a strategy of linguistic ‘tutoring’ which allow the child to take on board progressively more complex linguistic constructions; it also enriches exchanges from a pragmatic point of view. On the other hand, when adults communicate with multiply-handicapped adolescents, their main aim is the maintaining of dialogue.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernicot J., Salazar-Orvig A., Veneziano E. (2006) Les reprises: dialogue, formes, fonctions et ontogenèse. La Linguistique 42: 30–50
Bocéréan C., Musiol M. (2009) Mutual understanding mechanism in verbal exchanges between carers and multiply-disabled young people: An interaction structure analysis. Pragmatics 19(2): 161–177
Bohannon J. N. III, Stanowicz L. (1988) The issue of negative evidence: Adult responses to children’s language errors. Developmental Psychology 5(24): 684–689
Bruner J. S. (1983) Le développement de l’enfant: Savoir faire, savoir dire. Paris: P.U.F.
Canut E. (2006) Apprentissage du langage oral et accès à l’écrit. Travailler avec un chercheur dans l’école. Amiens: CRDP d'Amiens/Scérén.
Canut, E. (2009). La syntaxe: un socle indispensable à l’apprentissage du langage. In E. Lesconceptions interactionnistes de la linguistique del’acquisition àl alumière des approches contemporaines. L’exemple de parce que. In E. Canut & M. Vertalier (Eds.), L’apprentissage du langage: une approche interactionnelle. Réflexions théoriques et pratiques de terrain. (pp. 69–125). Paris: L’Harmattan
Canut, E., & Vertalier, M. (2005). Un fonctionnement-clé de l’acquisition du langage: essais et reformulations dans les interactions adulte-enfant. Colloque RRR: Répétition, Reprises et Reformulations. Quels usages dans les interactions verbales? Paris: LEAPLE, 1-2 avril.
Chouinard M. M., Clark E. V. (2003) Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language 30: 637–669
Clark E. V. (2006) La répétition et l’acquisition du langage. La Linguistique 42: 67–79
Clark E. V., Chouinard M. M. (2000) Enoncés enfantins et reformulations adultes dans l’acquisition du langage. Langages 140: 9–23
Clark H. H. (1996) Using language. C.U.P, Cambridge
Clark H. H., Wasow T. (1998) Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology 37: 21–242
Curl T. S., Local J., Walker G. (2006) Repetition and the prosody-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10): 1721–1751
De Weck G. (2006) Les reprises dans les interactions adulte-enfant: Comparaison d’enfants dysphasiques et tout-venant. La Linguistique 42: 115–133
Diessel H. (2004) The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gallaway C., Richards B. (1994) Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hudelot C. (1987) Organisateurs discursifs du dialogue adulte-enfant: une esquisse tracée à partir de quelques dialogues (enfants de 5 à 6 ans). Modèles Linguistiques IX(1): 33–51
Karnoouh-Vertalier M. (1998) Évolution du fonctionnement syntaxique et variantes Énonciatives. Observation d’interactions langagières entre adulte et enfant au cours d’activitÉs de narration. Langue Française 118: 84–103
Keith E. N., Welsh J., Camarata S. M., Butkovsky L., Camarata M. (1995) Available input for language-impaired children and younger children of matched language levels. First Language 15(43): 1–17
Lentin L. (2009) Apprendre à penser, parler, lire, écrire. E.S.F, Paris
Levinson S.C. (1983) Pragmatics. C.P.U, Cambridge
Lieven E. V. M., Pine J. M. (1993) Exposition et appropriation dans l’acquisition de la langue maternelle. AILE 2: 143–171
Musiol M., Trognon A., Coulon D., Bocéréan C. (2006) Structure de l’Interaction Verbale et Rationalité Argumentative chez l’Enfant Polyhandicapé~: Répétitions, Reprises et Dynamique. Le Langage et l’Homme XXXXI(2): 27–43
Nelson K. E., Kaplan B. J., Denninger M. S., Bonvillian J. D., Baker N. D. (1984) Maternal input adjustments and non-adjustments as related to children’s linguistic advances and to language acquisition theories. In: Pelligrini A., Yawkey T. (eds) The development of oral and written language in social contexts, Vol. XIII. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp 31–56
Nelson K. E., Welsh J. M., Camarata S. M., Tjus T., Heimann M. (2001) A rare event transactional model of tricky mix conditions contributing to language acquisition and varied communicative delays. In: Nelson K. E., Aksu-Koç A., Johnson C. E. (eds) Children’s language, Vol. 11. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 165–195
Perrin L., Deshaies D., Paradis C. (2003) Pragmatic functions of local diaphonic repetition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1843–1860
Rabain-Jamin, J., Marcos, H., & Bernicot, J. (2006). Reprises de l’adulte et socialisation de l’enfant Wolof (Sénégal). La Linguistique, 42, 81–98.
Rieger C. L. (2003) Repetition as self-repair strategies in English and German conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 47–69
Roulet E., Auchlin A., Moeschler J., Rubattel C., Schelling M. (1985) L’articulation du discours en français contemporain. Peter Lang, Berne
Salazar-Orvig A. (2000) La reprise aux sources de la construction discursive. Langage 140: 68–91
Schegloff E. A., Jefferson G., Sachs H. (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361–382
Searle, J. R. (1969/1972). Les actes de langage. Hermann: Paris.
Searle J. R., Vanderveken D. (1985) Foundations of illocutionary logic. C.P.U, Cambridge
Snow C. E. (1995) Issues in the study of input: Finetuning, universality, individual and developmental differences, and necessary causes. In: Fletcher P., MacWhinney B. (eds) The handbook of child language. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 180–193
Trognon A. (2002) Speech acts and the logic of mutual understanding. In: Vanderveken D., Kubo S. (eds) Essays in speech acts theory. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 121–133
Trognon A., Brassac C. (1992) L’enchaînement conversationnel. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 13: 67–108
Vanderveken D., Kubo S. (2002) Introduction. In: Vanderveken D., Kubo S. (eds) Essays in speech acts theory. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 1–21
Veneziano E. (2000) Conversation et acquisition du langage dans les trois premières années. In: Kail M., Fayol M. (eds) L’acquisition du langage. Le langage en émergence de la naissance à trois ans. P.U.F, Paris, pp 231–265
Verhaegen F., Bocéréan C., Musiol M. (2008) Rationalité du processus de répétition chez l’enfant normal et polyhandicapé: aux frontières de la pathologie. Philosophia Scientiae 12(2): 111–128
Vigil D. C., Hodges J., Kle T. (2005) Quantity and quality of parental language input to late-talking todlers during play. Child Language Teaching & Therapy 21(2): 107–122
Yont K. M., Hewitt L. R., Miccio A. W. (2002) What dit you say?: Understanding conversational breakdown in children with speech and language impairments. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 16(4): 265–285
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bocéréan, C., Canut, E. & Musiol, M. How Do Adults Use Repetition? A Comparison of Conversations with Young Children and with Multiply-Handicapped Adolescents. J Psycholinguist Res 41, 83–103 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9178-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9178-y