Skip to main content

Sources of History for “A Psychology of Verbal Communication”

Abstract

There is a standard version of the history of modern mainstream psycholinguistics that emphasizes an extraordinary explosion of research in mid twentieth century under the guidance and leadership of George A. Miller and Noam Chomsky. The narrative is cast as a dramatic shift away from behavioristic principles and toward mentalistic principles based largely on transformational linguistics. A closer view of the literature diminishes the historical importance of behaviorism, shows a prevailing “written language bias” (Linell in The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations, Routledge, London, 2005, p. 4) in psycholinguistic research, and elevates some theoretical and empirical thinking of the late nineteenth and the early twentieth centuries on language and language use to a far more important role than has heretofore been acknowledged. In keeping with the theoretical and methodological perspective of the present article, it is particularly appropriate that the German philologist Philipp Wegener be “given his due in the annals of linguistic sciences” (Koerner 1991, p. VI*). In his (1885/1991) Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens (Investigations regarding the fundamental questions of the life of language; our translation), he began his philological research with the investigation of actual speaking in everyday settings rather than with analyses of purely formal structure. Moreover, he emphasized understanding language and localized this function in the listener. Compatible with Wegener’s own investigations is another aspect of speaking that has been most seriously neglected throughout the history of research on the psychology of verbal communication. For him, as well as for Esper (In C. Murchison [Ed.], A handbook of social psychology, Clark University Press, Worchester, MA, 1935), the basic and primary genre of dialogical discourse was not ongoing conversation, but the occasional use of speech in association with other activities. Both Bühler (Sprachtheorie, Fischer, Stuttgart, 1934/1982) and Wittgenstein (Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical investigations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1958) have also emphasized the importance of the genre of occasional speaking. The article concludes with a discussion of historical shifts in the relationship between psychology and linguistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Abse, D. W. (1971). Speech and reason: Language disorder in mental disease and A translation of The life of speech, by Philipp Wegener. Charlottesville, VA: The University Press of Virginia.

  • Adams S., Powers F. F. (1929) The psychology of language. Psychological Bulletin 25: 241–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen J. T. (1990) Linguistics in America 1769–1924: A critical history. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Arens H. (1980) Geschichte der Linguistik. In: Althaus H. P., Henne H., Wiegand H. E. (eds) Lexikon der germanistischen Linguistik (2nd ed.). Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. (eds) (1986) The cognitive revolution in psychology. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldauf H. (2002) Knappes Sprechen. Niemeyer, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartschat B. (1996) Methoden der Sprachwissenschaft: Von Hermann Paul bis Noam Chomsky. Ernst Schmidt, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates E., Devescovi A., Wulfeck B. (2001) Psycholinguistics: A cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52: 369–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal A. L. (1970) Language and psychology: Historical aspects of psycholinguistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal A. L. (1985) Psychology and linguistics: The first half-century. In: Koch S., Leary D. E. (eds) A century of psychology as science. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 804–824

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boland J. E. (2005) Cognitive mechanisms and syntactic theory. In: Cutler A. (eds) Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 23–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Bühler, K. (1934/1982). Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: Fischer.

  • Carroll J. B. (1985) Psychology and linguistics: Detachment and affiliation in the second half-century. In: Koch S., Leary D. E. (eds) A century of psychology as science. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 825–854

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell J. M. (1886) The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind 11: 63–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark H. H. (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark H. H., Fox Tree J. E. (2002) Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84: 73–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark H. H., Van der Wege M. M. (2002) Psycholinguistics. In: Pashler H. (eds) Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 2. Memory and cognitive processe (3rd ed.). Wiley, New York, pp 209–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Danks J. H., Glucksberg S. (1980) Experimental psycholinguistics. Annual Review of Psychology 31: 391–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1992). Über das Gedächtnis: Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

  • Ervin-Tripp S. M., Slobin D. I. (1966) Psycholinguistics. Annual Review of Psychology 17: 435–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esper E. A. (1918) A contribution to the experimental study of analogy. Psychological Review 25: 468–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esper E. A. (1921) The psychology of language. Psychological Bulletin 18: 490–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esper E. A. (1935) Language. In: Murchison C. (eds) A handbook of social psychology. Clark University Press, Worchester, MA, pp 417–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Esper E. A. (1968) Mentalism and objectivism in linguistics: The sources of Leonard Bloomfield’s psychology of language. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Esper E. A. (1973) Analogy and association in linguistics and psychology. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris E. (1919) The psychology of language. Psychological Bulletin 16: 93–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillenbaum S. (1971) Psycholinguistics. Annual Review of Psychology 22: 251–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch W. T. (2005) Computation and cognition: Four distinctions and their implications. In: Cutler A. (eds) Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 381–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss D. J. (1988) Experimental psycholinguistics. Annual Review of Psychology 39: 301–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner A. (1932) The theory of speech and language. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod S., Pickering M. J. (2007) Alignment in dialogue. In: Gaskell M. G. (eds) The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 443–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes R. E. (1985) Articulation as emendation: Philipp Wegener’s anti-formalist theory of language. In: Deely J. (eds) Semiotics 1984. University Press of America, Washington, DC, pp 577–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes R. E. (1986) Introduction. In: Hörmann H. (eds) Meaning and context: An introduction to the psychology of language. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird P. N. (1974) Psycholinguistics. Annual Review of Psychology 25: 135–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd C. H. (1910) Psychology. Scribner’s, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd C. H. (1926) The psychology of social institutions. Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, J. R. (1936). An objective psychology of grammar. Indiana University Publications Science Series No. 1. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.

  • Knobloch, C. (1991) Introduction. In: P. Wegener, Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens. (pp. xi*–li*) Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Koerner, K. (1991) Editor’s foreword. In: P. Wegener Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens. (pp. V*–VII*) Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Lazarus, M. (1879/1986). Gespräche. Berlin: Henssel.

  • Linell P. (2005) The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan D.V. (1936) The psychology of language. Psychological Bulletin 33: 178–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster, Inc. (2003). Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (11th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.

  • Miller G. A. (1954) Communication. Annual Review of Psychology 5: 401–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1965). The psycholinguists: On the new scientists of language. In C. E. Osgood & T. A. Sebeok (Eds.), Psycholinguistics: A survey of theory and research problems (pp. 293–307). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press (originally published in Encounter, 1964, 23, 29–37).

  • Nerlich B. (1990) Language in change: Whitney, Bréal, and Wegener. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell D. C. (1988) Critical essays on language use and psychology. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell D. C., Kowal S. (2003) Psycholinguistics: A half century of monologism. American Journal of Psychology 116: 191–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell D. C., Kowal S. (2005) Uh and um revisited: Are they interjections for signalling delay? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34: 555–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell D. C., Kowal S. (2008) Communicating with one another: Toward a psychology of spontaneous spoken discourse. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell D. C., Kowal S. (2009) The evolution of modern psychology: A critical, forward-looking perspective on some pioneers. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 217: 73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, D. C., & Kowal, S. (in press). Psycholinguistics in historical perspective: From monologue to dialogue. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the history of the theories of psychology. New York: Springer.

  • Paul, H. (1920/1975). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

  • Pronko N. H. (1946) Language and psycholinguistics: A review. Psychological Bulletin 43: 189–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieber R. W., Vetter H. (1979) Theoretical and historical roots of psycholinguistic research. In: Aaronson D., Rieber R. W. (eds) Psycholinguistic research: Implications and applications. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 21–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein H., Aborn M. (1960) Psycholinguistics. Annual Review of Psychology 11: 291–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabin, E. J., & O’Connell, D. C. (2006). The microarchitecture of modern psycholinguistics [Review of the book Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones]. PsycCRITIQUES: Contemporary psychology—APA review of books, 51. Article 14. Retrieved February 16, 2006, from the PsycCRITIQUES database.

  • Saporta, S. (1961) Preface. In: Saporta S., & Bastian J. R. Psycholinguistics: A book of readings (p. v f.). New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

  • Sinclair, J. (Ed.). (2003). Collins cobulid advanced learner’s english dictionary (4th ed.). Glasgow: HarperCollins.

  • Skinner B. F. (1957) Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner B. F. (1961) The semantic aspects of linguistic events: The problem of reference. In: Saporta S., Bastian J. R. (eds) Psycholinguistics: A book of readings. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 228–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern C., Stern W. (1907) Die Kindersprache. J. A. Barth, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf C. (1924) Singen und Sprechen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 94: 1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Svartvik J., Quirk R. (1980) A corpus of English conversation. Gleerup, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • von der Gabelentz, G. (1901/1984). Die Sprachwissenschaft: Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

  • Wegener, P. (1885/1991). Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens (Newly edited). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Weiss A. P. (1925) Linguistics and psychology. Language 1: 52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L. (1958) Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt W. (1916) Elements of folk psychology (E. L. Schaub, Trans.). Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt W. (1921) Die Sprache, 2 Vols. Kroner, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel C. O’Connell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Connell, D.C., Kowal, S. Sources of History for “A Psychology of Verbal Communication”. J Psycholinguist Res 40, 29–47 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-010-9153-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-010-9153-z

Keywords

  • Psychology of language
  • (Experimental) Psycholinguistics
  • Philipp Wegener
  • Occasional speaking