Skip to main content
Log in

Fast Mapping in Healthy Young Adults: The Influence of Metamemory

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several research studies suggest the significant role played by metamemory in lexical abilities of both adults and children. To our knowledge, there have been no studies to date that have explored the role of metamemory (Judgments of Learning) in fast mapping of novel words by adults. One hundred and twelve undergraduate students were given tasks of fast mapping and judgments of learning. A one-way Multivariate Analysis of Variance revealed that participants who performed well on fast mapping had superior global and item-by-item absolute prediction scores compared to poor performers. However, the good and poor performers did not significantly differ in their item-by-item relative predictive accuracy (Goodman–Kruskal gamma correlations) in the immediate as well as the delayed judgments of learning conditions. The possible reasons for inferior gamma correlations, the methodological issues for future research and the clinical implications for the assessment and treatment of adults with lexical deficits are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Begg I., Duft S., Lalonde P., Melnick R., Sanvito J. (1989) Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory and Language 28: 610–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisanz G. L., Vesonder G. T., Voss J. F. (1978) Knowledge of one’s own responding and the relation of such knowledge to learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 25: 116–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom P. (2000) How children learn the meaning of words. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G., & Winchester, P. (1970). Metamemory judgments. Unpublished manuscript. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

  • Carey, S., & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. In Proceedings of the Stanford child language conference, 15, pp. 17–29.

  • Dollaghan C. (1985) Child meets word: “Fast mapping” in preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28(3): 449–454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dollaghan C. (1987) Fast mapping in normal and language-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 52: 218–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky J., Nelson T. O. (1992) Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory and Cognition 20: 374–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky J., Nelson T. O. (1994) Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language 33: 545–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky J., Nelson T. O. (1997) Similarity between the cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the cue for test is not the primary determinant of JOL accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language 36: 34–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golinkoff R. M., Hirsh-Pasek K., Bailey L. M., Wenger N. R. (1992) Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns. Developmental Psychology 28: 99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P. (2003) Examining the relationship between word learning, nonword repetition, and immediate serial recall in adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (A) 56: 1213–1236

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P., Lipinski J., Abbs B., Lin P. H., Aktunc M. E., Ludden D., Martin N., Newman R. (2004) Space aliens and nonwords: Stimuli for investigating the learning of novel word-meaning pairs. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36: 699–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P., Martin N., Abbs B., Schwartz M., Lipinski J. (2006) New word learning in aphasic patients: Dissociating phonological and semantic components. Brain and Language 99: 8–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball R. D., Metcalfe J. (2003) Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory. Memory and Cognition 31: 918–929

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki R. H., Berry S. L. (1984) Metacomprehension of text material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10: 663–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe J., Finn B. (2008) Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34(5): 1084–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson T. O., Dunlosky J. (1991) The delayed-JOL effect: When delaying your judgments of learning can improve the accuracy of your metacognitive monitoring. Psychological Science 2: 267–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson T. O., Dunlosky J. (1992) How shall we explain the delayed-judgment-of-learning effect? Psychological Science 3: 317–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson T. O., Dunlosky J., Graf A., Narens L. (1994) Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science 5(4): 207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson T. O., Narens L. (1990) Metamemory: A theoretical framework and some new findings. In: Bower G. H. (eds) The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 26. Academic Press, New York, pp 125–173

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Service E., Craik F. I. M. (1993) Differences between young and older adults in learning a foreign vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language 32: 608–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spellman B. A., Bjork R. A. (1992) When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess. Psychological Science 3: 315–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souchay C., Bacon E., Danion J. M. (2006a) Metamemory in Schizophrenia: An exploration of the feeling-of-knowing state. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 28: 828–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Souchay C., Isingrini M., Gil R. (2006b) Alzheimer’s disease and feeling-of-knowing in episodic memory. Neuropsychologia 40: 2386–2396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storkel, H. (1998). The influence of phonotactic probability and metacognition on fast mapping. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(10B), 5594. (UMI No. AAM 9908895) Retrieved January 05, 2005, from Dissertations and Theses database.

  • Storkel H. L., Armbruster J., Hogan T. P. (2006) Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49: 1175–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thiede K. W., Dunlosky J. (1994) Delaying students’ metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting their recognition performance. Journal of Education Psychology 86(2): 290–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesonder G. T., Voss J. F. (1985) On the ability to predict one’s own responses while learning. Journal of Memory and Language 24: 363–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winn W., Snyder D. (1996) Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In: Jonassen D. H. (eds) Handbook for research for educational communications and technology. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York, pp 112–142

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijayachandra Ramachandra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramachandra, V., Rickenbach, B., Ruda, M. et al. Fast Mapping in Healthy Young Adults: The Influence of Metamemory. J Psycholinguist Res 39, 213–224 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9133-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9133-3

Keywords

Navigation