Skip to main content
Log in

Design-Based Guidelines for the Semantic Perception of Emergency Signs

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study applies semantic differential to explore the semantic perception of emergency signs, in an attempt to analyze the meanings of emergency signs in regard to the psychological exigencies of the general public. The results indicate that problems concerning recognition accuracy have been observed, but also that the evaluation of the semantic meaning of the signs is positive. However, a number of emotional factors also emerge, indicating that if improvements should be made to the existing emergency signs, it would better facilitate evacuation in the event of an emergency. As for the design guidelines, the emergency signs should be readily recognizable and have a single meaning. Multiple symbolic meanings should be eliminated. Concrete design guidelines include: (a) safety movement, (b) clarity, and (c) safety. To avoid confusion in sign recognition, in addition to the improvements made based on the abovementioned guidelines, educational promotional activities carried out by the government would also prove very beneficial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson L. M. (1981) Land use designations affect perception of scenic beauty in forest landscape. Forest Science 27(2): 392–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Böcker, M. (1993). A multiple index approach for the evaluation of pictograms. In Proceedings of the 14th international symposium on human factors in telecommunications (pp. 73–85). Heidelberg: R. v. Decker’s Verlag, G. Schenck GmbH.

  • Bullimore M.A., Fulton E.J., Howarth P.A. (1991) Assessment of visual performance. In: Wilson J. R., Corlett E. (eds) Evaluation of human work Chap. 26. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 648–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang W. C., Van Y. T. (2003) Researching design trends for the redesign of product form. Design Studies 24: 173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang M. C., Chang C. C., Hsu S. H. (2001) Perceptual factors underlying user preferences toward product form of mobile phones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 27: 247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang M. C., Ma Y. C. (2001) Expressing the expected product images in product design of micro- electronic products. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 27: 233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNS. (2004). Chinese National Standard for exit lights and emergency direction lights: 10207. Taipei, Taiwan: Chinese National Standard Institute.

  • Dewar R. E., Ells J. G. (1977) The semantic differential as an index of traffic sign perception and comprehension. Human Factors 19(2): 183–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Easterby R. (1970) The perception of symbols for machine displays. Ergonomics 13: 145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habron D. (1988) Visual perception of wildland in Scotland. Landscape and Urban Planning 42(1): 45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao S. W., Chen C. H. (1997) A semantic and shape grammar based approach for product design. Design Studies 18: 275–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao S. W., Wang H. P. (1998) Applying the semantic transformation method to product form design. Design Studies 19: 309–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu S. H., Chuang M. C., Chang C. C. (2000) A semantic differential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 25: 375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull R. B., Stewart W. P. (1992) Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgements. Journal of Environmental Psychology 12: 101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Standards Organization (ISO). (1984). International standard for safetycolours and safetysigns: ISO 3864, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Lin, R. (1999). Cultural differences in icon recognition. In G. Salvendy, M. Smith, & R. Koubek (Eds.), Design of computing systems (Vol. I, pp. 725–729). Proceedings of the eighth international conference on human–computer interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Lin R., Lin P. C., Ko K. J. (1999) A study of cognitive human factors in mascot design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 23: 107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire M. C. (1985) A review of human factors guidelines and techniques for the design of graphical human–computer interfaces. Computers and Graphics 9(3): 221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer C., Overbeeke C. J., Smets G. (1992) The semantics of street furniture. In: Vihma S. (eds) Objects and images: Studies in design and advertising. University of Industrial Arts, Helsinki, pp 86–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakada K. (1997) Kansei engineering research on the design of construction machinery. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 19: 129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P. R. (1989). Designing screen icons: Ranking and matching studies. In Proceedings of the human factors society 33rd annual meeting, human factors, Santa Monica (pp. 380–384).

  • Osgood C. E., Suci G. J., Tannenbaum P. H. (1967) The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Petiot, J. F., & Yannou, B. (2003). How to comprehend and assess product semantics-A proposal for an integrated methodology. In International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 03, Stockholm.

  • Sanders M. S., McCormick E. J. (1993) Human factors in engineering design. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 121–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelby B., Harris R. (1985) Comparing methods for determining visitor evaluations of ecological impacts: Site visits, photographs and written descriptions. Journal of Leisure Research 17(1): 57–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Stramler J. H. Jr. (1993) The dictionary for human factors/ergonomics. CRC Press, London, p 413

    Google Scholar 

  • Summit J., Sommer R. (1999) Further studies of preferred three shapes. Environment and Behavior 31(4): 550–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrvainen L., Tahvanainen L. (1999) Using computer graphics for assessing the scenic value of large-scale rural landscape. Forthcoming Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 14: 282–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukio O. (1987) Pictogram design. Kashiwashobo, Tokyo, pp 196–199

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chieh-Hsin Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, CW., Hsiao, HY., Tang, CH. et al. Design-Based Guidelines for the Semantic Perception of Emergency Signs. J Psycholinguist Res 39, 21–33 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9123-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9123-5

Keywords

Navigation