Abstract
We investigate the on-line processing of verb-phrase ellipsis (VPE) constructions in two brain injured populations: Broca’s and Anomic aphasics. VPE constructions are built from two simple clauses; the first is the antecedent clause and the second is the ellipsis clause. The ellipsis clause is missing its verb and object (i.e., its verb phrase (VP)), which receives its reference from the fully specified VP in the antecedent clause. VPE constructions are unlike other sentence types that require displacement of an argument NP; these latter constructions (e.g., object-relatives, wh-questions) yield either on-time or delayed antecedent reactivation. Our results demonstrate that Anomics, like unimpaired individuals, evince reactivation of the direct object NP (within the VP) at the elided position. Broca’s patients, on the other hand, do not show reactivation of the antecedent. We consider several interpretations for our data, including explanations focusing on the larger ‘grain size’ of the reconstructed material in the ellipsis clause, the properties of the auxiliary that carries tense and agreement features, and the possibility that the cost-free syntactic copy procedure claimed to underlie VPE may be modulated by the functional deficit in Broca’s aphasia.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amunts, K., Schleicher, A., Burgel, U., Mohlberg, H., Uylings, H. B., & Zilles, K. (1999). Broca’s region revisited: Cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 412, 319–341. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990920)412:2<319::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-7.
Arregui, A., Clifton, C., Frazier, L., & Moulton, K. (2006). Processing elided verb phrases with flawed antecedents: The recycling hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 232–246. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.005.
Balogh, J., Zurif, E., Prather, P., Swinney, D., & Finkel, L. (1998). Gap-filling and end-of-sentence effects in real-time language processing: Implications for modeling sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 61 169–182. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1917.
Bélanger S. (2004). Processing of deep and surface anaphors. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics: Special Issue on Syntax and Psycholinguistics 22: 1–40
Bradley, D. C., Garrett, M. F., & Zurif, E. B.(1980). Syntactic deficits in Broca’s aphasia. In D. Caplan (Ed.), Biological studies of mental processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Burkhardt, P., Mercedes Piñango, M., & Wong, K. (2003). The role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentence comprehension: Evidence from split intransitivity. Brain and Language, 86, 9–22. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00526-6.
Burkhardt, P., Avrutin, S., Piñango, M. M., & Ruigendijk, E. (2008). Slower-than-normal syntactic processing in agrammatic broca’s aphasia: Evidence from dutch. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 120–137. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.10.004.
Caplan, D., Waters, G., Dede, G., Michaud, J., & Reddy, A. (2007). A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects. Brain and Language, 101, 103–150. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.225
Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–582. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1.
Dalrymple, M., Shieber, S. M., & Pereira, F. C. N. (1991). Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 399–452. doi:10.1007/BF00630923.
Dickey, M. W., & Thompson, C. K. (2004). The resolution and recovery of filler-gap dependencies in aphasia: Evidence from on-line anomaly detection. Brain and Language, 88, 108–127. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00283-9.
Dickey, M. W., Choy, J. J., & Thompson, C. K. (2007). Real-time comprehension of wh-movement in aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking while listening. Brain and Language, 100, 1–22. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.004.
Drai, D., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2006). A new empirical angle on the variability debate: Quantitative neuroysyntactic analyses of a large data set from Broca’s Aphasia. Brain and Language, 96, 117–128. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.016.
Elbourne, P. (2008). Ellipsis sites as definite descriptions. Linguistic Inquiry, 39, 191–220. doi:10.1162/ling.2008.39.2.191.
Fiengo, R., & May, R. (1994). Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2001). Parsing coordinates and ellipsis: Copy. Syntax, 4, 1–22. doi:10.1111/1467-9612.00034.
Frazier L. and Clifton C. Jr (2005). The syntax-discourse divide: Processing ellipsis. Syntax 8: 121–174
Friedmann, N., & Shapiro, L. P. (2003). Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents hebrew OSV and OVS structures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 46, 288–297. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/023).
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E.(1972). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination (2nd Ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
Grodzinsky Y. (1986). Language deficits and the theory of syntax. Brain and Language 27: 135–159
Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 50, 27–51. doi:10.1006/brln.1995.1039.
Grodzinsky Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 1–21
Grodzinsky, Y., & Finkel, L. (1998). The neurology of empty categories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 281–292. doi:10.1162/089892998562708.
Grodzinsky, Y., Piñango, M. M., Zurif, E., & Drai, D. (1999). The critical role of group studies in neuropsychology: Comprehension regularities in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 67, 134–147. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2050.
Haarmann, H. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1991). Syntactic priming in broca’s aphasics: Evidence for slow activation. Aphasiology, 5, 247–263. doi:10.1080/02687039108248527.
Hardt, D. (1993). Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hardt, D. (1999). Dynamic interpretation of verb phrase ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, 187–221. doi:10.1023/A:1005427813846.
Hickok, G., Zurif, E., & Canseco-Gonzalez, E., (1993). Structural description of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 45, 371–395. doi:10.1006/brln.1993.1051.
Johnson, K. (2001). What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory pp. 439–479.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122.
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S.(1983). Boston naming test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
Kehler A. (2000). Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 533–575
Kertesz, A. (1982). Western aphasia battery test manual (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
ter Keurs, M., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Stegeman, D. F. (1999). Electrophysiological manifestations of open- and closed-class words in patients with Broca’s aphasia with agrammatic comprehension: An event-related brain potential study. Brain, 122, 839–854.
ter Keurs, M., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2002). Lexical processing of vocabulary class in patients with Broca’s aphasia: An event-related brain potential study on agrammatic comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1547–1561.
Lobeck, A. (1995). Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Love T. and Swinney D. (1996). Conference processing and levels of analysis in object relative; demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25: 5–24
Love, T., & Oster, E. (2002). On the categorization of aphasic typologies: The SOAP (a test of syntactic complexity). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 503–529. doi:10.1023/A:1021208903394.
Love, T., Swinney, D., Walenski, M., & Zurif, E. (2008). How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.004.
Martin, A. E., & McElree, B. (2008). A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 879–906. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.010.
Mauner, G., Fromkin, V. A., & Cornell, T. L. (1993). Comprehension and acceptability judgments in agrammatism: Disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency. Brain and Language, 45, 340–370. doi:10.1006/brln.1993.1050.
Merchant, J. (2001). The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nagel, H. N., Shapiro, L.P., & Nawy, R. (1994). Prosody and the processing of filler-gap constructions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23 473–486.
Prather P., Shapiro L.P., Zurif E.B. and Swinney D. (1991). Real-time examinations of lexical processing in aphasia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20: 271–281
Rosenberg, B., Zurif, E. B., Brownell, H., Garrett, M. F., & Bradley, D. C. (1985). Grammatical class effects in relation to normal and aphasic sentence processing. Brain and Language, 26, 287–303. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(85)90044-6.
Sag, I. (1976). Deletion and logical form. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Santi A. and Grodzinsky Y. (2007). working memory with Syntax: Bi-hemispheric modulations. Human Brain Mapping 28: 1089–97
Shapiro, L. P., & Hestvik, A. (1995). On-line comprehension of VP-ellipsis: Syntactic reconstruction and semantic influence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 517–532. doi:10.1007/BF02143165.
Shapiro, L. P., Hestvik, A., Lesan, L., & Garcia, A. R. (2003). Charting the time-course of VP-ellipsis sentence comprehension: Evidence for an initial and independent structural analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 1–19. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00026-3.
Swinney, D., Ford, M., Frauenfelder, U., & Bresnan, J. (1987). The time course of coindexation during sentence comprehension. Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society Meeting, Seattle.
Swinney, D., & Prather, P. (1989). On the comprehension of lexical ambiguity by young children: Investigations into the development of mental modularity. Resolving Semantic Ambiguity 225–238.
Swinney D.A., Zurif E.B. and Cutler A. (1980). Effects of sentential stress and word class upon comprehension in Broca’s aphasics. Brain and Language 10: 132–144
Swinney, D., Zurif, E., Prather, P., & Love, T. (1996). Neurological distribution of processing resources underlying language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 174–184.
Thompson, C. K., & Choy, J. J. (This volume). Pronominal resolution and gap filling in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eye movements.
Vasic, N., Avrutin, S., & Rui gendijk, E. (2006). Interpretation of pronouns in VP-ellipsis constructions in Dutch Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 96, 191–206.
Williams, E. (1977). Discourse and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 101–139.
Zurif, E. B. (2000). Syntactic and semantic composition. Brain and Language, 71(1), 261–263. doi:10.1006/brln.1993.1054.
Zurif, E., Swinney, D., Prather, P., Solomon, J., & Bushell, C. (1993). An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 448–464. doi:10.1006/brln.1993.1054.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Poirier, J., Shapiro, L.P., Love, T. et al. The On-Line Processing of Verb-Phrase Ellipsis in Aphasia. J Psycholinguist Res 38, 237–253 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9108-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9108-4