Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Race and Gender in Current American Politics: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male and female, black and white political interviewees (M. Albright, B. Clinton, H. Clinton, B. Obama, C. Powell, and C. Rice) of Larry King on CNN TV are used to ascertain whether ethnicity and gender affect the way politicians actually speak. Qualitative comparisons are made of Obama’s hesitations and rate with and without a threatening context. A number of normalized response measures are evaluated quantitatively: percentage of syllables spoken by each interviewee, and use of interjections, interruptions, self-referent I, non-standard English, y’ know, and syllables of laughter. Senator Obama and Secretary of State Rice become the focus of the comparative evidence that both ethnicity and gender do indeed influence the speaking of politicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antaki C., Widdicombe S. (1998) Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In: Antaki C., Widdicombe S. (eds) Identities in talk. Sage, London, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1971/2000). Ideology interpellates individuals as subjects. In P. du Gay, J. Evans, & P. Redman (Eds.), Identity: A reader (pp. 31–39). London: Sage.

  • Anderson B. (1983) Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, M. (2008, October 19). Will gun-toting churchgoing white groups pull the lever for Barack Obama? The New York Times Magazine, pp. 38–45, 60, 64.

  • Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: Texas University Press.

  • Baxter J. (2003) Positioning gender in discourse: A feminist methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvoir S. (1952) The second sex. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, E. (1971/2000). Subjectivity in language. In P. du Gay, J. Evans, & P. Redman (Eds.), Identity: A reader (pp. 39–43). London: Sage.

  • Blommaert J. (2005) Discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert J., Verschueren J. (1998) Debating diversity: Analysing the discourse of tolerance. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P. (1991) Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. (2008, October 17). Thinking about Obama. The New York Times, p. A27.

  • Butler J. (1990) Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron D. (1997) Theoretical debates in feminist linguistics. In: Wodak R. (eds) Gender and discourse. Sage, London, pp 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron D., Kulick D. (2003) Language and sexuality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton B. (2004) My life. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton H. (2003) Living history. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N. (2002) Register, power, and socio-semantic change. In: Toolan M. (eds) Critical discourse analysis: Critical concepts in linguistics Vol. 1. Routledge, London, pp 304–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallows J. (2008) Rhetorical questions. The Atlantic 302: 34–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1952/1967). Black skins, white masks (C. L. Markmann, Trans.). New York: Grove Press.

  • Foucault M. (1972) The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Pantheon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E. (1977) The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society 4: 301–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E. (1979) Gender advertisement. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Graumann C., Kallmeyer W. (2002) Perspective and perspectivation in discourse: An introduction. In: Graumann C., Kallmeyer W. (eds) Perspective and perspectivation in discourse. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall S. (2000) Who needs identity?. In: du Gay P., Evans J., Redman P. (eds) Identity: A reader. Sage, London, pp 15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • James D., Clarke S. (1993) Women, men and interruptions: A critical review. In: Tannen D. (eds) Gender and conversational interaction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 231–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch P., Oesterreicher W. (1994) Schriftlichkeit und Sprache. In: Günther H., Ludwig O. (eds) Schrift und Schriftlichkeit. Writing and its use. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forchung. An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 587–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov W. (1966) The social stratification of English in New York City. Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov W. (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff R. (1975) Language and women’s place. In: Bucholtz M. (eds) Language and women’s place: Text and commentaries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 38–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt W.J.M. (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Linell P. (1998) Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Linell P., Luckman T. (1991) Asymmetries in dialogue: Some conceptual preliminaries. In: Marková I., Foppa K. (eds) Asymmetries in dialogue. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Savage, MD, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusane C. (2006) Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice: Foreign policy, race, and the new American century. Praeger, Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Maalouf, A. (2000). On identity (B. Bray, Trans.). London: The Harvill Press.

  • Marková I. (2003) Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehl M., Vazire S., Ramfrez-Esparza N., Slatcher R., Pennebaker J. (2007) Are women really more talkative than men?. Science 317: 82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mills S. (2003) Gender and politeness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Myer D. (2008) Why women should rule the world. HarperCollins Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama B. (2006) The audacity of hope: Thoughts on reclaiming the American dream. Crown Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell D.C., Kowal S. (1994) The transcriber as language user. In: Bartelt G. (eds) The dynamics of language processes: Essays in honor of W Dechert. Narr, Tübingen, pp 119–142

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell D.C., Kowal S. (1998) Orality and literacy in public discourse: An interview of Hannah Arendt. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 543–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell D.C., Kowal S. (2005) Laughter in Bill Clinton’s My Life (2004) interviews. Pragmatics 15: 275–299

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell D.C., Kowal S. (2008) Communicating with one another: Toward a psychology of spontaneous spoken discourse. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell D.C., Kowal S., Dill E. III (2004) Dialogicality in TV news interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 185–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Räthzel N. (1997) Gender and racism in discourse. In: Wodak R. (eds) Gender and discourse. Sage, London, pp 57–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Saadawi N. (1997). Why keep asking me about my identity? In The Nawal El-Saadawi Reader (pp. 117–133). London: Zed Books.

  • Said E. (1978) Orientalism. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shethar A. (2002) Strategic uses of self and other perspectives. In: Graumann C., Kallmeyer W. (eds) Perspective and perspectivation in discourse. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 181–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer S. (2005) Gender talk: Feminism, discourse and conversation analysis. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman C., O’Connell D.C. (2003) Perspective in the discourse of war: The case of Colin Powell. Pragmatics 13: 401–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman C., O’Connell D.C. (2007) The social construction of perspective in radio and television interviews: The discourse of Bill Clinton. Studies in Language and Capitalism 2: 75–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman C., O’Connell D.C. (2008) Gender differences in the media interviews of Bill and Hillary Clinton. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 37: 33–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman C., O’Connell D.C., Kowal S. (2002) ‘If you and I, if we, in this later day, lose that sacred fire...’: Perspective in political interviews. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31: 281–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen D. (1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk T. (1997) Communicating racism. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak R. (2005) Gender mainstreaming and the European Union: Interdisciplinarity, gender studies and CDA. In: Lazar M. (eds) Feminist critical discourse analysis. Palgrave, New York, pp 90–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., Cillia, R., Reisigl, M.,& Liebhart, K. (1999). The discursive construction of national identity. (A. Hirsch, R. Mitten, Trans.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA

    Camelia Suleiman

  2. Georgetown University, Georgetown, Washington, DC, USA

    Daniel C. O’Connell

Authors
  1. Camelia Suleiman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel C. O’Connell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Camelia Suleiman or Daniel C. O’Connell.

Additional information

The authors wish to thank Aman Onallah for her transcription of Senator Obama’s interview, and Anahita Abdeshahian for her transcription of Secretary of State Rice’s interview.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suleiman, C., O’Connell, D.C. Race and Gender in Current American Politics: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. J Psycholinguist Res 37, 373–389 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9087-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9087-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation