Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity to Syntactic Changes in Garden Path Sentences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of two text-change experiments are reported. The experiments were designed to investigate the syntactic representation of garden path sentences such as While the man hunted the deer that was brown and graceful ran into the woods, specifically the claim that a significant number of misinterpretations of such sentences are due to incomplete syntactic reanalysis (Christianson et al. Cogn Psychol 42:368–407, 2001). In the experiments reported here, the pronoun it was added (Expt. 1) or deleted (Expt. 2) from short texts containing such sentences. Participants were more or less likely to notice both deletions and additions of it in certain syntactic contexts, as predicted by the incomplete reanalysis account. Correlations with reading times support this interpretation of the results. Overall, the data are consistent with a “good enough” view of language processing (Ferreira et al. J Psycholinguist Res 30:3–20, 2001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton S.B., Sanford A.J. (1993) A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory and Cognition 21: 477–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1986) Knowledge of language. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson K., Hollingworth A., Halliwell J.F., Ferreira F. (2001) Thematic-roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology 42: 368–407. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0752.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christianson K., Williams C.C., Zacks R.T., Ferreira F. (2006) Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences by older and younger adults. Discourse Processes 42: 205–238. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4202_6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson T.D., Mattson M.E. (1981) From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 540–551. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90165-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira F. (2003) The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology 47: 164–20. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira F., Bailey K.G.D., Ferraro V. (2002) Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11: 11–15. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira F., Christianson K., Hollingworth A. (2001) Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: Implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30: 3–20. doi:10.1023/A:1005290706460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira F., Henderson J.M. (1991) Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 725–745. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90034-H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J.D., Inoue A. (1998) Attach anyway. In: FodorJ.D. Ferreira F.(eds) Reanalysis in sentence processing.. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 101–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier L., Clifton C. Jr. (1996) Construal. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., Seidenberg M.S. (1994) Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101: 676–703. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovitz W. (1996) The effect of discourse factors on backward anaphora. Word 47: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollatsek A., Well A.D. (1995) On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21: 785–794. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs J.S. (1967) Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics 2: 437–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford A.J. (2002) Context, attention and depth of processing during interpretation. Mind & Language 17: 188–206. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford A.J., Sturt P. (2002) Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Science 6: 382–386. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01958-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford A.J.S., Sanford A.J., Filik R., Molle J. (2005) Depth of lexical-semantic processing and sentential load. Journal of Memory & Language 53: 378–396. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturt P., Sanford A.J., Stewart A., Dawydiak E. (2004) Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11: 882–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets B., Desmet T., Clifton C. Jr., Ferreira F. (2008) Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading. Memory & Cognition 36: 201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trask R.L. (1993) A dictionary of grammatical terms in linguistics. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gompel R.P.G., Liversedge S.P. (2003) The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. Journal of Memory & Language: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29: 128–139 doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompel R.P.G., Pickering M.J., Pearson J., Jacob G. (2006) The activation of inappropriate analyses in garden-path sentences: Evidence from structural priming. Journal of Memory & Language 55: 335–362. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiel Christianson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christianson, K. Sensitivity to Syntactic Changes in Garden Path Sentences. J Psycholinguist Res 37, 391–403 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9072-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9072-4

Keywords

Navigation