Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Processing of Syllables in Production and Recognition Tasks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical evidence for a functional role of syllables in visual word processing is abundant, however it remains rather heterogeneous. The present study aims to further specify the role of syllables and the cognitive accessibility of syllabic information in word processing. The first experiment compared performance across naming and lexical decision tasks by manipulating the number of syllables in words and non-words. Results showed a syllable number effect in both the naming task and the lexical decision task. The second experiment introduced a stimulus set consisting of isolated syllabic and non-syllabic trigrams. Syllable frequency was manipulated in a naming and in a decision task requiring participants to decide on the syllabic status of letter strings. Results showed faster responses for syllables than for non-syllables in both tasks. Syllable frequency effects were observed in the decision task. In summary, the results from these manipulations of different types of syllable information confirm an important role of syllabic units in both recognition and production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aichert I., Ziegler W. (2004). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language 88, 148–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aichert I., Ziegler W. (2005). Is there a need to control for sublexical frequencies?. Brain and Language 95, 170–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ans B., Carbonnel S., Valdois S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review 105, 678–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Bachoud-Levy A.-C., Dupoux E., Cohen L., Mehler J. (1998). Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study of speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 39: 331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley A.I. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders 36(3): 189–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber H., Vergara M., Carreiras M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Neuroreport 15, 545–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras M., Álvarez C.J., de Vega M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language 32, 766–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras M., Perea M. (2004a). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language 90, 393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras M., Perea M. (2004b). Effects of syllable neighbourhood frequency in visual word recognition and reading: Cross-task comparisons. In: Ferrand L., Grainger J.(eds) Psycholinguistique cognitive. Bruxelles, Belgium: De Broeck Université

    Google Scholar 

  • Cholin J., Levelt W.J.M., Schiller N. (2006). Effects ofsyllable frequency in speech production. Cognition 99(2): 205–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 108(1): 204–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad M., Jacobs A.M. (2004). Replicating syllable-frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 19(3): 369–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen C., Pollack M., Montague W. (1970). Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding?. Journal of Experimental Psychology 84: 502–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrand L., New B. (2003). Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. Acta Psychologica 113, 167–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrand L., Segui J. (2003). Reading aloud polysyllabic words. In: Assink E.M.H., Sandra D.(eds) Reading complex words: Cross language studies. New York, Kluwer Academic, pp. 295–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrand L., Segui J., Grainger J. (1996). Masked priming of words and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 708–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster K.I., Chambers S. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12, 627–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. (1994). A dual-read out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20: 1158–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, M., Stenneken, P., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Sublexical frequency measures for orthographic and phonological units in German. Behavior Research Methods, accepted for publication.

  • Hutzler F., Bergmann J., Conrad M., Kronbichler M., Stenneken P., Jacobs A.M. (2004). Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters 372(3): 179–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutzler F., Conrad M., Jacobs A.M. (2005). Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: An eye movement study. Brain and Language 92, 138–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs A.M., Graf R., Kinder A. (2003). Receiver operating characteristics in the lexical decision task: Evidence for a simple signal-detection process simulated by the multiple read-out model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 29(3): 481–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jared D., Seidenberg M.S. (1990). Naming multisyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16(1): 92–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klapp S.T. (1971). Implicit speech inferred from response latencies in same-different decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 91, 262–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klapp S.T., Anderson W.G., Berrian R.W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading, reconsidered. Journal of Experimental Psychology 100, 368–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwantes P.J., Mewhort D.J.K. (1999). Modeling lexical decision and word naming as a retrieval process. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 53(4): 306–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laganaro M. (2005). Syllable frequency effect in speech production: evidence from aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics 18, 221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C.H. (2001). Absence of syllable effects: Monosyllabic words are easier than multisyllabic words. Perceptual and Motor Skills 93, 73–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt W.J.M., Wheeldon L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary?. Cognition 50: 239–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massaro D.W., Cohen M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20: 1107–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathey S., Zagar D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition: The effect of syllabic neighborhood in French. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain and Cognition 8: 107–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Perea M., Carreiras M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24(1): 134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinzmetal W., Treiman R., Rho S.H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of_ Memory and Language 25: 461–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp B.C. (1992). The nature of sublexical orthographic organisation. The bigram trough hypothesis examined. Journal of Memory and Language 31: 33–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey A., Ziegler J.C., Jacobs A.M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition 75, B1–B12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo López M., Jiménez González J.E. (2000). IQ versus phonological recoding skill in explaining differences between poor readers and normal readers in word recognition: Evidence from a naming task. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12: 129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, A. (2002). Syllable structure effect turn out to be word length effects: Comment on Santiago et al. (2000). Language and Cognitive Processes 17(1): 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin D.C. (1974). The subjective estimation of relative syllable frequency. Perception and Psychophysics 16(1): 193–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago J., MacKay D.G., Palma A. (2002). Length effects turn out to be syllable structure effects: Response to Roelofs (2002). Language and Cognitive Processes 17(1): 15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago J., MacKay D.G., Palma A., Rho C. (2000). Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming. Language and_ Cognitive Processes 15(1): 1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller N. (1998). The effect of visually masked syllable primes on the naming latencies of words and pictures. Journal of Memory and Language 39: 484–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller N.O. (2000). Single word production in English: The role of subsyllabic units during phonological encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26: 512–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 244–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Spoehr K.T., Smith E.E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology 5: 71–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenneken P., Conrad M., Goldenberg G., Jacobs A. (2003). Visual processing of sublexical units in dyslexia. Brain and Language 87: 137–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenneken P., Conrad M., Hutzler F., Braun M., Jacobs A.M. (2005). Frequency effects with visual words and syllables in a dyslexic reader. Behavioural Neurology 16, 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenneken P., Hofmann M., Jacobs A.M. (2005). Patterns of phoneme and syllable frequency in jargon aphasia. Brain and Language 95: 221–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeldon L.R., Levelt W.J.M. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language 34: 311–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler W. (2005). A nonlinear model of word length effects in apraxia of speech. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22: 603–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler J.C., Perry C., Coltheart M. (2000). The DRC model of visual word recognition and reading aloud: An extension to German. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 12: 413–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorzi M., Houghton G., Butterworth B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24: 1131–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Prisca Stenneken, Markus Conrad & Arthur M. Jacobs

  2. Cath. University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstr. 26, D-85072, Eichstätt, Germany

    Prisca Stenneken

Authors
  1. Prisca Stenneken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Conrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arthur M. Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prisca Stenneken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stenneken, P., Conrad, M. & Jacobs, A.M. Processing of Syllables in Production and Recognition Tasks. J Psycholinguist Res 36, 65–78 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9033-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9033-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation