Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Cross-Sectional Comparison of US Adult Diabetes Screening Levels by Disability Status

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Journal of Primary Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diabetes is a potentially life-threatening metabolic condition that disproportionately affects US adults with a disability. Diabetes screening is key to early disease detection and prompt treatment, but it is not known whether US adults with a disability receive similar levels of diabetes screening as individuals without a disability. We compared diabetes screening levels in US adults with a disability to those without one. Using national 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys, we determined the prevalence of diabetes screening by disability status in US adults who fall under the American Diabetes Association’s recommended screening guidelines: those younger than 45 years old with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 and those aged 45 years and older. We used logistic regression modelling to examine the impact of disability status on diabetes screening while adjusting for diabetes associated sociodemographic and clinical factors. In people with a disability, around 50% of those younger than 45 years old with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and 33% of those 45 years or older did not receive screening. In the under 45 years with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 screening group, individuals with a disability had a slightly higher but non-significant prevalence, but a lower adjusted odds of diabetes screening compared to those without a disability. People with a disability under age 45 had a slightly lower but again non-significant prevalence but a higher adjusted odds of diabetes screening than did those without a disability who were age 45 or older. Additional interventions are needed to improve diabetes screening levels among US adults with a disability at high risk of developing diabetes as screening is a critical initial step in the diabetes management process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data used in this study is publicly available and can be found at the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) website: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/about/index.htm.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

There was no funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Phoebe Tran originated the idea and the study design. Lam Tran ran the data analyses and interpreted results. Liem Tran assisted with study design. All authors contributed in writing the original article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phoebe Tran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. The BRFSS data used in this study is a secondary publicly available data source that has been completely anonymized and released for public use by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Informed Consent

This article is exempt from needing informed consent as no human participants were involved in the study and the data used has been completely anonymized and approved for public use by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tran, P., Tran, L. & Tran, L. A Cross-Sectional Comparison of US Adult Diabetes Screening Levels by Disability Status. J Primary Prevent 42, 459–471 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-021-00641-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-021-00641-4

Keywords

Navigation