Advertisement

The Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 529–544 | Cite as

Understanding Wait Times in Rapid Re-Housing Among Homeless Youth: A Competing Risk Survival Analysis

  • Hsun-Ta HsuEmail author
  • Eric Rice
  • Jennifer Wilson
  • Sara Semborski
  • Phebe Vayanos
  • Matthew Morton
Original Paper

Abstract

Approximately 3.5 million youth experience homelessness in the United States. Assisting youth to exit homelessness as quickly as possible through various housing venues aims to prevent adverse health impacts that prolonged homeless experiences may have on youth. Rapid re-housing (RRH) is a recent, short-term, less costly housing option than permanent supportive housing that provides temporary housing supports and services to counter homelessness. Although previous literature indicates that youth are likely to achieve stable homelessness exits via RRH, the duration of wait times for youth and potential disparities in RRH waiting periods remain unclear. We used administrative data from 16 communities across the United States (N = 10,920) to gain a greater understanding about RRH wait times among homeless youth. In addition, we adopted a competing risk survival analysis to investigate potential disparities (i.e., race and ethnicity, gender, rurality, sexual orientation, and previous homelessness condition) in RRH wait times while taking into consideration the presence of other homelessness exit options (e.g., permanent supportive housing). Study results indicate that RRH is a common homelessness exit for homeless youth and is prioritized for youth assessed as mid-vulnerability, per commonly accepted assessment measures of youth vulnerability. However, youth who received RRH waited, on average, 131 days following their housing eligibility assessment. Furthermore, being a minor (i.e., 17 years old or younger), experiencing homelessness in rural communities, and lower engagement in homeless services (e.g., emergency shelters and transitional living programs) were all associated with lower probability of exiting into RRH over time, taking into account the possibility of other competing homelessness exits. Expansion of the short-term housing supports offered through RRH may be a promising strategy to counter homelessness among youth in a timely manner. However, such an expansion should also address the potential disparities underlying youths’ wait time to receive RRH in order to reduce prolonged homelessness experiences within this vulnerable population.

Keywords

Rapid re-housing Homelessness Homeless youth Disparity Wait time 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Iain De Jong with OrgCode, Inc. provided the data for this research. This work was generously supported by a grant from Schmidt Futures.

Funding

This work was generously supported by a grant from Schmidt Futures.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Allgood, S., & Warren, R. S., Jr. (2003). The duration of homelessness: Evidence from a national survey. Journal of Housing Economics, 12(4), 273–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2003.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, M., Klebek, L., Chodzen, G., Scartozzi, S., Cummings, C., & Raskind, A. (2018). Housing status among single adults following homelessness prevention and rapid re-housing program participation in Indianapolis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 69, 92–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.04.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, M., Vaclavik, D., Watson, D. P., & Wilka, E. (2017). Predictors of homeless services re- entry within a sample of adults receiving homelessness prevention and rapid re-housing program (HPRP) assistance. Psychological Services, 14(2), 129.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne, T., Treglia, D., Culhane, D. P., Kuhn, J., & Kane, V. (2016). Predictors of homelessness among families and single adults after exit from homelessness prevention and rapid re-housing programs: Evidence from the Department of Veterans Affairs Supportive Services for Veteran Families program. Housing Policy Debate, 26(1), 252–275.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2015.1060249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cunningham, M., Gillespie, S., & Anderson, J. (2015). Rapid re-housing: What the research says. Housing and Housing Finance. Retrieved October 15, 2018, from Urban Institute website: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/54201/2000265-Rapid-Re-housing-What-the-Research-Says.pdf.
  6. Ensign, J., & Bell, M. (2004). Illness experiences of homeless youth. Qualitative Health Research, 14(9), 1239–1254.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304268795.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finkel, M., Henry, M., Matthews, N., Spellman, B. E., & Culhane, D. P. (2016). Rapid re-housing for homeless families demonstration programs evaluation report, Part II: Demonstration findingsOutcomes evaluation. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/RRHD-PartII-Outcomes.pdf.
  9. Gubits, D., Shinn, M., Wood, M., Bell, S., Dastrup, S., Solari, C. D., et al. (2016). Family options study: 3-year impacts of housing and services interventions for homeless families. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/Family-Options-Study-Full-Report.pdf.
  10. Halley, M., & English, A. (2008). Health care for homeless youth: Policy options for improving access. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Adolescent Health & the Law.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, T., Rice, E., Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., & Wenzel, S. (2017). Gender differences in the path from sexual victimization to HIV risk behavior among homeless youth. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 26(3), 334–351.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2017.1287146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Medlow, S., Klineberg, E., & Steinbeck, K. (2014). The health diagnoses of homeless adolescents: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Adolescence, 37(5), 531–542.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.04.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Milburn, N. G., Ayala, G., Rice, E., Batterham, P., & Rotheram-Borus, M. J. (2006). Discrimination and exiting homelessness among homeless adolescents. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 12(4), 658.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.12.4.658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Morton, M. H., Dworsky, A., Matjasko, J. L., Curry, S. R., Schlueter, D., Chávez, R., et al. (2018). Prevalence and correlates of youth homelessness in the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(1), 14–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Orgcode Consulting. (2015). Transition Age Youth-Vulnerability Index-Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool (TAY-VI-SPDAT): Next Step Tool for Homeless Youth. Retrieved October 15, 2018, from http://orgcode.nationbuilder.com/spdat.
  16. Padgett, D. K., Henwood, B., & Tsemberis, S. (2015). Housing first: Ending homelessness, transforming systems, and changing lives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pearson, C., Montgomery, A. E., & Locke, G. (2009). Housing stability among homeless individuals with serious mental illness participating in housing first programs. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(3), 404–417.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Perlman, S., Willard, J., Herbers, J. E., Cutuli, J. J., & Eyrich Garg, K. M. (2014). Youth homelessness: Prevalence and mental health correlates. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 5(3), 361–377.  https://doi.org/10.1086/677757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rattelade, S., Farrell, S., Aubry, T., & Klodawsky, F. (2014). The relationship between victimization and mental health functioning in homeless youth and adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(9), 1606–1622.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513511529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rice, E. (2018). Assessment tools for prioritizing housing resources for youth who are homeless. In S. Kidd, N. Slesnick, T. Frederick, J. Karabanow, & S. Gaetz (Eds.), Mental health & addictions interventions for youth experiencing homelessness: Practical strategies for front-line providers. Toronto: Canadian Observatory on Homelessness Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rice, E., Holguin, M., Hsu, H., Morton, M., Vayanos, P., Tambe, M., et al. (2018). Linking the TAY-VI-SPDAT tool to housing placements and outcomes for youth experiencing homelessness. Cityscape, 20(3), 69–86.Google Scholar
  22. Rodriguez, J. M., & Eidelman, T. A. (2017). Homelessness interventions in Georgia: Rapid re-housing, transitional housing, and the likelihood of returning to shelter. Housing Policy Debate, 27(6), 825–842.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2017.1313292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spellman, B., Khadduri, J., Leopold, J., & Sokol, B. (2010). Costs associated with first-time homelessness for families and individuals. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://www.huduser.gov/publications/pdf/costs_homeless.pdf.
  24. StataCorp. (2011). Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, J. (2014,). Housing assistance for households experiencing homelessness. Paper presented at National Alliance to End Homelessness National Conference on Ending Family and Youth Homelessness, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  26. Toro, P. A., Dworsky, A., & Fowler, P. J. (2007). Homeless youth in the United States: Recent research findings and intervention approaches. In Toward Understanding Homelessness: The 2007 National Symposium on Homelessness Research.Google Scholar
  27. U. S. Housing and Urban Development. (2016). Coordinated entry and youth FAQs. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from www.hudexchange.infro/resources/documents/Coordinated-Entry-and-Youth-FAQs.pdf.
  28. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2013). Rapid re-housing: ESG vs CoC. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/Rapid_Re-Housing_ESG_vs_CoC.pdf.
  29. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2015). Coordinated entry policy brief. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://hudexchange.infro/resources/documents/Coordinated-Entry-Policy-Brief.pdf.
  30. Wilkins, C., & Burt, M. R. (2012). Public housing agencies and permanent supportive housing for chronically homeless people. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/76441/ChrHomls4.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social WorkUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.University of Southern California Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social WorkLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.University of Denver Graduate School of Social WorkDenverUSA
  4. 4.University of Southern California Viterbi School of EngineeringLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Chapin Hall at the University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations