Universal school-based substance use prevention programs are widely disseminated and often include a focus on peer relationships. Network theory and social network analysis (SNA) have emerged as useful theoretical and methodological frameworks for examining the role of peer relationships in prevention and intervention research. We used content analysis to systematically code the peer processes targeted by three universal school based prevention programs. We found that programs focused on peer socialization more than peer selection, and programs focused about evenly on descriptive and injunctive norms. Programs varied in their focus on positive and negative peer processes and behaviors, but most references to peer processes focused on positive processes and negative behaviors. The focus on peer processes at the dyadic, subgroup, and network levels varied across the three programs, with the heaviest focus on network level processes. When peer processes were targeted, it was rare that lessons focused on peer processes for an extended (> 50%) amount of the lesson content. However, when peer processes were a focus, discussion and reflection were commonly encouraged. These patterns are considered in the context of non-intervention research on adolescent peer relations, which highlights the importance of peer selection and dyad-level processes, and the existence of positive peer processes that promote adolescent development. In doing so, we provide a framework that can be used to (1) examine the extent to which a particular program focuses on the different peer processes, and (2) inform systematic experimental studies of the extent to which particular peer processes are malleable in response to intervention efforts.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Balsa, A. I., Homer, J. F., French, M. T., & Norton, E. C. (2011). Alcohol use and popularity: Social payoffs from conforming to peers’ behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00704.x.
Botvin, G. J. (1979–2000). Life skills training: Promoting health and personal development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Health Press.
Botvin, G. J., & Griffin, K. W. (2004). Life skills training: empirical findings and future directions. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 25, 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPP.0000042391.58573.5b.
Bryant, A. L., Schulenberg, J. E., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (2003). How academic achievement, attitudes, and behaviors relate to the course of substance use during adolescence: A 6-year, multiwave national longitudinal study. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 361–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.1303005.
Bukowski, W. M., Motzoi, C., & Meyer, F. (2009). Friendship as process, function, and outcome. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 217–231). New York: Guilford.
Cheadle, J. E., Walsemann, K. M., & Goosby, B. J. (2015). Teen alcohol use and social networks: The contributions of friend influence and friendship selection. Journal of Alcoholism and Drug Dependence, 3(5), 224. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6488.1000224.
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2008). The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(21), 2249–2258. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0706154.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104.
D.A.R.E. America. (2009). Keepin’ it REAL. Los Angeles, CA: D.A.R.E. America.
de la Haye, K., Green, H. D., Kennedy, D. P., Pollard, M. S., & Tucker, J. S. (2013). Selection and influence mechanisms associated with marijuana initiation and use in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12018.
DeLay, D., Laursen, B., Kiuru, N., Salmela-Aro, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2013). Selecting and retaining friends on the basis of cigarette smoking similarity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12017.
Dusenbury, L., & Falco, M. (1995). Eleven components of effective drug abuse prevention curricula. Journal of School Health, 65, 420–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1995.tb08205.x.
Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (2012). Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems. New York: Springer.
Faggiano, F., Minozzi, S., Versino, E., & Buscemi, D. (2014). Universal school-based prevention for illicit drug use. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014(12), CD003020. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003020.pub3.
Foxcroft, D. R., & Tsertsvadze, A. (2011). Universal school-based prevention programs for alcohol misuse in young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011(5), CD009113. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009113.
Friedkin, N. E. (1998). A structural theory of social influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gest, S. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., Bierman, K. L., & Moody, J. (2011). Strengthening prevention program theories and evaluations: Contributions from social network analysis. Prevention Science, 12, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0229-2.
Graham, J. W., Marks, G., & Hansen, W. B. (1991). Social influence processes affecting adolescent substance use. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.291.
Green, H. D., Horta, M., de la Haye, K., Tucker, J. S., Kennedy, D. R., & Pollard, M. (2013). Peer influence and selection processes in adolescent smoking behavior: A comparative study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15, 534–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts191.
Gremmen, M. C., Berger, C., Ryan, A. M., Steglich, C. E., Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2018). Adolescents’ friendships, academic achievement, and risk behaviors: Same-behavior and cross-behavior selection and influence processes. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13045.
Haas, S. A., & Schaefer, D. R. (2014). With a little help from my friends? Asymmetrical social influence on adolescent smoking initiation and cessation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55(2), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146514532817.
Hall, J. A., & Valente, T. W. (2007). Adolescent smoking networks: The effects of influence and selection on future smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 32(12), 3054–3059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.04.008.
Hansen, W. B. (2004). All stars: Building bright futures. Greensboro, NC: Tanglewood Research Inc.
Hansen, W. B., & Graham, J. W. (1991). Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Preventive Medicine, 20(3), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(91)90039-7.
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64–105.
Hecht, M. L., Marsiglia, F. F., Elek, E., Wagstaff, D. A., Kulis, S., Dustman, P., et al. (2003). Culturally grounded substance use prevention: An evaluation of the Keepin’ it R.E.A.L. Curriculum. Prevention Science, 4, 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026016131401.
Huang, G. C., Unger, J. B., Soto, D., Fujimoto, K., Pentz, M. A., Jordan-Marsh, M., et al. (2014). Peer influences: The impact of online and offline friendship networks on adolescent smoking and alcohol use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(5), 508–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.001.
Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Killeya-Jones, L. A., Nakajima, R., & Costanzo, P. R. (2007). Peer standing and substance use in early-adolescent grade-level networks: A short-term longitudinal study. Prevention Science, 8(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-006-0053-2.
Kindermann, T. A., & Gest, S. D. (2009). Assessment of the peer group: Identifying naturally occurring social networks and capturing their effects. In K. H. Rubin, W. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 100–117). New York: Guilford.
Knecht, A. B., Burk, W. J., Weesie, J., & Steglich, C. (2011). Friendship and alcohol use in early adolescence: A multilevel social network approach. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(2), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00685.x.
Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
La Greca, A. M., Prinstein, M. J., & Fetter, M. D. (2001). Adolescent peer crowd affiliation: Linkages with health-risk behaviors and close friendships. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 26(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/26.3.131.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. C. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.
Lansford, J. E., Criss, M. M., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2003). Friendship quality, peer group affiliation, and peer antisocial behavior as moderators of the link between negative parenting and adolescent externalizing behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.1302002.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger & T. Abel (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (Vol. 2, pp. 18–66). New York: Van Nostrand.
Logis, H. A., Rodkin, P. C., Gest, S. D., & Ahn, H.-J. (2013). Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12033.
Mathys, C., Burk, W. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2013). Popularity as a moderator of peer selection and socialization of adolescent alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco use. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12031.
Mercken, L., Snijders, T. A., Steglich, C., Vartiainen, E., & De Vries, H. (2010). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks, 32(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.005.
Moody, J., Brynildsen, W. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., & Gest, S. (2011). Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence. Social Networks, 33(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.10.001.
Moody, J., Feinberg, M. E., Osgood, D. W., & Gest, S. D. (2010). Mining the network: Peers and adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47(4), 324–326.
Mundt, M. P. (2011). The impact of peer social networks on adolescent alcohol use initiation. Academic Pediatrics, 11(5), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2011.05.005.
Mundt, M. P., Mercken, L., & Zakletskaia, L. (2012). Peer selection and influence effects on adolescent alcohol use: A stochastic actor-based model. BMC Pediatrics, 12(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-115.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 306–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.306.
Osgood, D. W., Ragan, D. T., Wallace, L., Gest, S. D., Feinberg, M. E., & Moody, J. (2013). Peers and the emergence of alcohol use: Influence and selection processes in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 500–512.
Park, H. S., & Smith, S. W. (2007). Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: A case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00296.x.
Pearson, M., Steglich, C., & Snijders, T. (2006). Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections, 27(1), 47–63.
Poulin, F., Kiesner, J., Pedersen, S., & Dishion, T. J. (2011). A short-term longitudinal analysis of friendship selection on early adolescent substance use. Journal of Adolescence, 34(2), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.05.006.
Prinstein, M. J., & Wang, S. S. (2005). False consensus and adolescent peer contagion: Examining discrepancies between perceptions and actual reported levels of friends’ deviant and health risk behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 293–306.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., Parker, J. G., & Bowker, J. C. (2008). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Child and adolescent development: An advanced course (pp. 141–180). Hoboken: Wiley.
Schaefer, D. R., Haas, S. A., & Bishop, N. J. (2012). A dynamic model of US adolescents’ smoking and friendship networks. American Journal of Public Health, 102(6), e12–e18. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300705.
Shamblen, S. R., & Derzon, J. H. (2009). A preliminary study of the population-adjusted effectiveness of substance abuse prevention programming: Towards making IOM program types comparable. Journal of Primary Prevention, 30, 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-009-0168-x.
Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 329–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x.
Tobler, N. S., Roona, M. R., Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D. G., Streke, A. V., & Stackpole, K. M. (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. Journal of Primary Prevention, 20(4), 275–336. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021314704811.
Tucker, J. S., Green, H. D., Zhou, A. J., Miles, J. N., Shih, R. A., & D’Amico, E. J. (2011). Substance use among middle school students: Associations with self-rated and peer-nominated popularity. Journal of Adolescence, 34(3), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.05.016.
Valente, T. W., Gallaher, P., & Mouttapa, M. (2004). Using social networks to understand and prevent substance use: A transdisciplinary perspective. Substance Use and Misuse, 39(10–12), 1685–1712.
Valente, T. W., Unger, J. B., & Johnson, C. A. (2005). Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(4), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.10.016.
Van Ryzin, M. J., DeLay, D., & Dishion, T. J. (2016). Being well-liked predicts increased use of alcohol but not tobacco in early adolescence. Addictive Behaviors, 53, 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.10.017.
Véronneau, M. H., & Dishion, T. J. (2011). Middle school friendships and academic achievement in early adolescence: A longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(1), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610384485.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, R. P. (Ed.). (1990). Basic content analysis (No. 49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01994.x.
Wills, T. A., & Cleary, S. D. (1999). Peer and adolescent substance use among 6th–9th graders: Latent growth analyses of influence versus selection mechanisms. Health Psychology, 18(5), 453. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-618.104.22.1683.
This study was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) T32 Prevention and Methodology Training (PAMT) Program at the Pennsylvania State University (Grant No. T32 DA017629).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
This research did not involve human participants or animals.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henneberger, A.K., Gest, S.D. & Zadzora, K.M. Preventing Adolescent Substance Use: A Content Analysis of Peer Processes Targeted Within Universal School-Based Programs. J Primary Prevent 40, 213–230 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-019-00544-5
- Peer relationships
- Substance use prevention
- School-based prevention