Advertisement

The Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 191–203 | Cite as

The Association of Point-of-Sale E-cigarette Advertising with Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Neighborhoods

  • Neng Wan
  • Mohammad Siahpush
  • Raees A. Shaikh
  • Molly McCarthy
  • Athena Ramos
  • Antonia Correa
Original Paper

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) marketing expenditure is skyrocketing in the United States. However, little is understood about the geographic and socio-demographic patterns of e-cigarette advertising. We examined the associations between point-of-sale (POS) e-cigarette advertising and neighborhood socio-demographic characteristics in the Omaha Metropolitan Area of Nebraska. In 2014, fieldworkers collected comprehensive POS e-cigarette advertising data from all stores that sell tobacco (n = 463) in the Omaha Metropolitan Area. We used Geographic Information Systems to map POS e-cigarette advertisement density for the entire study area. Linear regression was used to examine the association between socio-demographic factors and POS e-cigarette advertising density. E-cigarette advertising density exhibited an obviously uneven geographic pattern in Omaha. Higher level of POS e-cigarette advertising was significantly related to lower median household income, higher percentage of Hispanics, and higher percentage of young adults. However, after adjusting for covariates, only median household income remained significantly associated with POS e-cigarette advertising. We found geographic, socioeconomic, and racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to POS e-cigarette advertising in Omaha, Nebraska. Future studies are needed to understand how these disparities influence e-cigarette adoption by different social groups and how to use such information to inform e-cigarette prevention strategies.

Keywords

Electronic cigarette Point-of-sale advertising GIS Race and ethnicity Socioeconomic status Kernel density 

Notes

Author’s Contribution

We assure that all authors included on a paper fulfill the criteria of authorship. All have contributed in the conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content, and final approval of the version to be published. In addition we also assure that there is no one else who fulfills the criteria but has not been included as an author.

Funding

This work was funded through the National Institute of Health Grant # R01CA166156.

Compliance With Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that there was no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work, neither did we have other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Ethical Approval

This study did not involve any direct contact between researchers and participants. Institutional Review Board at University of Nebraska Medical Center provided the ethical approval for this study.

Informed Consent

This study did not required any direct contact with human subjects and so informed consent was not required for this study.

References

  1. Barbeau, E. M., Wolin, K. Y., Naumova, E. N., & Balbach, E. (2005). Tobacco advertising in communities: Associations with race and class. Preventive Medicine, 40(1), 16–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Battelle Memorial Institute. StoreALERT report card: Advocates Limiting Exposure to Retail Tobacco.Google Scholar
  3. Bunnell, R. E., Agaku, I. T., Arrazola, R., Apelberg, B. J., Caraballo, R. S., Corey, C. G., et al. (2014). Intentions to smoke cigarettes among never-smoking US middle and high school electronic cigarette users: National Youth Tobacco Survey, 2011–2013. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17(2), 228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cahn, Z., & Siegel, M. (2011). Electronic cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy for tobacco control: A step forward or a repeat of past mistakes? Journal of Public Health Policy, 32(1), 16–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantrell, J., Emelle, B., Ganz, O., Hair, E. C., & Vallone, D. (2016). Rapid increase in e-cigarette advertising spending as Altria’s MarkTen enters the marketplace. Tobacco Control, 25, e16–e18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Corey, C., Wang, B., Johnson, S. E., Apelberg, B., Husten, C., King, B. A., et al. (2013). Electronic cigarette use among middle and high school students—United States, 2011–2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 62(35), 729–730.Google Scholar
  7. Duke, J. C., Lee, Y. O., Kim, A. E., Watson, K. A., Arnold, K. Y., Nonnemaker, J. M., et al. (2014). Exposure to electronic cigarette television advertisements among youth and young adults. Pediatrics, 134(1), E29–E36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dutra, L. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2014). Electronic cigarettes and conventional cigarette use among US adolescents: A cross-sectional study. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(7), 610–617.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Dwyer, J. B., McQuown, S. C., & Leslie, F. M. (2009). The dynamic effects of nicotine on the developing brain. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 122(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feighery, E. C., Schleicher, N. C., Cruz, T. B., & Unger, J. B. (2008). An examination of trends in amount and type of cigarette advertising and sales promotions in California stores, 2002–2005. Tobacco Control, 17(2), 93–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ganz, O., Cantrell, J., Moon-Howard, J., Aidala, A., Kirchner, T. R., & Vallone, D. (2015). Electronic cigarette advertising at the point-of-sale: A gap in tobacco control research. Tobacco control, 24, e110–e112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Glynn, T. J. (2014). E-cigarettes and the future of tobacco control. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 64(3), 164–168.Google Scholar
  13. Gostin, L. O., & Glasner, A. Y. (2014). E-cigarettes, vaping, and youth. JAMA, 312(6), 595–596.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Grana, R. A. (2013). Electronic cigarettes: A new nicotine gateway. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(2), 135–136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Khan, T., Baker, D., Huang, J., & Chaloupka, F. (2014). Changes in E-Cigarette Availability over Time in the United States: 2010-2012 - A BTG Research Brief. Retrieved from Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  16. King, B. A., Alam, S., Promoff, G., Arrazola, R., & Dube, S. R. (2013). Awareness and ever-use of electronic cigarettes among US adults, 2010–2011. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15(9), 1623–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King, B. A., Patel, R., Nguyen, K., & Dube, S. R. (2015). Trends in awareness and use of electronic cigarettes among US adults, 2010–2013. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17(2), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kornfield, R., Huang, J., Vera, L., & Emery, S. L. (2015). Rapidly increasing promotional expenditures for e-cigarettes. Tobacco control, 24, 110–111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Laws, M. B., Whitman, J., Bowser, D. M., & Krech, L. (2002). Tobacco availability and point of sale marketing in demographically contrasting districts of Massachusetts. Tobacco Control, 11(suppl 2), ii71–ii73.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, J. G. L., Henriksen, L., Myers, A. E., Dauphinee, A. L., & Ribisl, K. M. (2014). A systematic review of store audit methods for assessing tobacco marketing and products at the point of sale. Tobacco Control, 23(2), 98–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mantey, D. S., Cooper, M. R., Clendennen, S. L., Pasch, K. E., & Perry, C. L. (2016). E-cigarette marketing exposure is associated with e-cigarette use among US youth. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 58(6), 686–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pearson, J. L., Richardson, A., Niaura, R. S., Vallone, D. M., & Abrams, D. B. (2012). E-cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions in US adults. American Journal of Public Health, 102(9), 1758–1766.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Pepper, J. K., Emery, S. L., Ribisl, K. M., & Brewer, N. T. (2014). How U.S. adults find out about electronic cigarettes: Implications for public health messages. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 16(8), 1140–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Primack, B. A., Soneji, S., Stoolmiller, M., Fine, M. J., & Sargent, J. D. (2015). Progression to traditional cigarette smoking after electronic cigarette use among US adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatrics, 169(11), 1018–1023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Rigotti, N. A., Harrington, K. F., Richter, K., Fellows, J. L., Sherman, S. E., Grossman, E., et al. (2015). Increasing prevalence of electronic cigarette use among smokers hospitalized in 5 US cities, 2010–2013. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17(2), 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Robehmed, N. (2013). E-cigarette sales surpass $1 billion as big tobacco moves in. http://www.forbes.com/sites/natalierobehmed/2013/09/17/e-cigarette-sales-surpass-1-billion-as-big-tobacco-moves-in/#c16ab75548e9. Accessed May 1, 2015.
  27. Rose, S. W., Barker, D. C., D’Angelo, H., Khan, T., Huang, J., Chaloupka, F. J., et al. (2014). The availability of electronic cigarettes in U.S. retail outlets, 2012: Results of two national studies. Tobacco Control, 23(Suppl 3), iii10–iii16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Siahpush, M., Jones, P. R., Singh, G. K., Timsina, L. R., & Martin, J. (2010). The association of tobacco marketing with median income and racial/ethnic characteristics of neighbourhoods in Omaha, Nebraska. Tobacco Control, 19(3), 256–258.  https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.032185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Siahpush, M., Tibbits, M., Soliman, G. A., Grimm, B., Shaikh, R. A., McCarthy, M., et al. (2017). Neighbourhood exposure to point-of-sale price promotions for cigarettes is associated with financial stress among smokers: Results from a population-based study. Tobacco Control.  https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053339.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. New York: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Census 2010 summary file 1 (SF1): Nebraska. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  32. U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). American community survey 2009-2013 five year estimates: Nebraska. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  33. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2016). E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults. A Report of the Surgeon General. Retrieved from Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
  34. Wagener, T. L., Siegel, M., & Borrelli, B. (2012). Electronic cigarettes: Achieving a balanced perspective. Addiction, 107(9), 1545–1548.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wan, N., Zhan, F. B., Zou, B., & Chow, E. (2012). A relative spatial access assessment approach for analyzing potential spatial access to colorectal cancer services in Texas. Applied Geography, 32(2), 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Widome, R., Brock, B., Noble, P., & Forster, J. L. (2013). The relationship of neighborhood demographic characteristics to point-of-sale tobacco advertising and marketing. Ethnicity & Health, 18(2), 136–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhu, S.-H., Gamst, A., Lee, M., Cummins, S., Yin, L., & Zoref, L. (2013). The use and perception of electronic cigarettes and snus among the US population. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e79332-Article No.: e79332.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079332.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neng Wan
    • 1
  • Mohammad Siahpush
    • 2
  • Raees A. Shaikh
    • 3
  • Molly McCarthy
    • 2
  • Athena Ramos
    • 2
  • Antonia Correa
    • 2
  1. 1.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.University of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA
  3. 3.University of Oklahoma Health Science CenterOklahoma CityUSA

Personalised recommendations