Abstract
We explored how adolescent marijuana edible users differ in regards to marijuana use and related beliefs from marijuana users who do not use edibles. We analyzed California Healthy Kids Survey data collected in one Northern California school district with a racially and ethnically diverse student population. Survey respondents were youth in grades 9–12. Overall, 33% of respondents reported having used marijuana in their lifetime, and 50% of lifetime marijuana users reported using marijuana in the past 30 days. Seventy-two percent of lifetime marijuana users and 82% of past month marijuana users reported having used edibles in their lifetime. Comparing marijuana users who have never used edibles to those users who have, we found that edible users reported using marijuana more frequently in their lifetime. Edible users were also more likely to have used marijuana in the past 30 days, more frequently in the past 30 days, more likely on school property and more frequently on school property. Edible users and non-users differed in their perceptions of risk; edible users were less likely to agree that edible use is very risky. Edible users also reported a younger age of first marijuana use and more attempts to stop using marijuana than non-edible users. Multi-level regression analyses indicate that prevalence of edible use among marijuana users was related to perceived risk of edible use. Perceived risk of edible use among marijuana users was higher among marijuana users who do not use edibles, females, and those youth who perceive school rules to be clear. The findings indicate that prevalence of edible use is high among marijuana users, especially frequent users.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ArcView Market Research. (2015). The state of legal marijuana markets: Executive Summary, 3rd ed. Retrieved from http://www.arcviewmarketresearch.com/executive-summary.
Baca, R. (2014, March 9). Edibles’ THC claims versus lab tests reveal big discrepancies. Denver Post. Retrieved from http://www.thecannabist.co/2014/03/09/tests-show-thc-content-marijuana-edibles-inconsistent/6421/.
Boyd, C. J., Veliz, P. T., & McCabe, S. E. (2015). Adolescents’ use of medical marijuana: A secondary analysis of Monitoring the Future Data. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57, 241–244.
California Department of Education. (2015). Data Quest. Retrieved from http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/.
Colorado Department of Revenue. (2015a, February 27). Annual Update. Retrieved from https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/2014%20MED%20Annual%20Report_1.pdf.
Colorado Department of Revenue. (2015b). Marijuana enforcement division: Retail marijuana code. Retrieved from https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/1%20CCR%20212-2_Retail.pdf.
Friese, B., Slater, M. D., Annechino, R., & Battle, R. S. (2016). Teen use of marijuana edibles: A focus group study of an emerging issue. Journal of Primary Prevention, 37, 303–309.
He, J., Assanangkornchai, S., Cai, L., & McNeil, E. (2015). Patterns of alcohol consumption in Yunnan Province of China: Which measure is optimal? Alcohol and Alcoholism, 50(5), 579–587.
Huestis, M. A. (2007). Human cannabinoid pharmacokinetics. Chemistry & Biodiversity, 4, 1770–1804.
Ingold, J. (2014, October 20). Proposed Colorado marijuana edibles ban shows lingering pot discord. The Denver Post. Retrieved from http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_26765732/proposed-colorado-marijuana-edibles-ban-shows-lingering-pot.
Johnston, L. D., Miech, R. A., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2014, December 16). Retrieved from http://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics/monitoring-future/monitoring-future-survey-overview-findings-2014#_ftnref1.
MacCoun, R. J., & Mello, M. M. (2015). Half-baked—The retail promotion of marijuana edibles. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(11), 989–991.
McDonough, E. (2015, February 24). 2015 High Times SoCal Medical Cannabis Cup: The top 15 edibles. High Times. Retrieved from http://www.hightimes.com/read/2015-high-times-socal-medical-cannabis-cup-top-15-edibles.
Monte, A. A., Zane, R. D., & Heard, K. J. (2015). The implications of marijuana legalization in Colorado. JAMA, 313, 241–242.
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2010). HLM 7 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
Schauer, G. L., King, B. A., Bunnell, R. E., Promoff, G., & McAfee, T. A. (2016). Toking, vaping, and eating for health or fun: Marijuana use patterns in adults, U.S., 2014. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(1), 1–8.
Vandrey, R., Raber, J. C., Raber, M. E., Douglass, B., Miller, C., & Bonn-Miller, M. O. (2015). Cannabinoid dose and label accuracy in edible medical cannabis products. JAMA, 313(24), 2491–2493.
Wang, G. S., Roosevelt, G., & Heard, K. (2013). Pediatric marijuana exposures in a medical marijuana state. JAMA Pediatrics, 167, 630–633.
Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board. (2015). Frequently asked questions about the I-502 Rules. Retrieved from http://www.liq.wa.gov/mj2015/faqs-rules.
Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board. (2016). Marijuana approved infused product list. Retrieved from http://www.liq.wa.gov/records/frequently-requested-lists.
Weiss, S. (2015, March). Products infused with marijuana account for about 40 percent of all sales, but are they safe? National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/civil-and-criminal-justice/edibles-for-experts-only.aspx.
Wested. (2016). California healthy kids survey: Marijuana lifetime use. Retrieved from http://chks.wested.org/indicators/101/marijuana-use-in-lifetime-student-reported-by-grade-level/.
Acknowledgements
This publication was made possible by Grant R34DA038262 (PIs: B. Friese and M. Slater) from the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIDA or of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friese, B., Slater, M.D. & Battle, R.S. Use of Marijuana Edibles by Adolescents in California. J Primary Prevent 38, 279–294 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-017-0474-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-017-0474-7