The Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 303–309 | Cite as

Teen Use of Marijuana Edibles: A Focus Group Study of an Emerging Issue

  • Bettina Friese
  • Michael D. Slater
  • Rachelle Annechino
  • Robynn S. Battle
Brief Report

Abstract

Recent research indicates that marijuana-infused food product (i.e., edible) use is becoming nearly as common as smoking marijuana where medical marijuana is available. This study explores edible use among teens. We conducted four focus groups in the San Francisco Bay Area with youth, ages 15–17. The focus groups were divided by gender and whether they used marijuana. Some teens mentioned edible use at school. Youth reported that teens consume edibles, primarily to reduce the likelihood of getting caught. Edibles are also attractive to those who do not like to smoke or have concerns about smoking. Both male and female respondents suggested that females are more likely than males to prefer edibles over smoking, one reason for which may be to avoid smelling like marijuana smoke. For some young women, edibles may be a way to avoid publicly presenting themselves as marijuana users. Findings also suggest that youth have access to edibles through multiple sources. Youth reported that they can purchase edibles at school from other students who either make the edibles themselves or are reselling edibles obtained from dispensaries. Both users and non-users were aware of potentially negative consequences related to edible use. Some youth mentioned that they have heard of youth dying from edibles, and several reported being concerned about the high produced by edibles. Female non-users appeared to be more concerned than others about edibles and compared them to drinks that could be spiked with drugs. However, sentiment among some male marijuana users was that if you cannot handle edibles you should not be using them. These findings suggest that strategies to curb access to edibles and use among youth, such as restricting sales of edibles with strong youth appeal and educating youth on the risks of edibles, will need to be developed.

Keywords

Youth Marijuana Edibles Marijuana-infused products Dispensaries 

References

  1. California Department of Public Health (2016). Medical marijuana program frequently asked questions. Retrieved from https://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/MMP/Pages/MMPFAQ.aspx#26.
  2. CBS News (2014). Two Denver deaths tied to recreational marijuana use. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/two-denver-deaths-tied-to-recreational-marijuana-use/.
  3. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Denver Post (2014). Proposed Colorado marijuana edibles ban shows lingering pot discord. Retrieved from http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_26765732/proposed-colorado-marijuana-edibles-ban-shows-lingering-pot?source=infinite.
  5. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Huestis, M. A. (2007). Human cannabinoid pharmacokinetics. Chemistry & Biodiversity, 4, 1770–1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnston, L. D., Miech, R. A., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics/monitoring-future/monitoring-future-survey-overview-findings-2014#_ftnref1.
  8. Muhr, T. (2009). ATLAS.ti (qualitative analysis support software), version 5. Berlin: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  9. Nichter, M., Nichter, M., Lloyd-Richardson, E. E., Flaherty, B., Carkoglu, A., & Taylor, N. (2006). Gendered dimensions of smoking among college students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(3), 215–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sanders, J. M. (2012). Use of mutual support to counteract the effects of socially constructed stigma: Gender and drug addiction. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 7(2–4), 237–252. doi:10.1080/1556035X.2012.705705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bettina Friese
    • 1
  • Michael D. Slater
    • 2
  • Rachelle Annechino
    • 1
  • Robynn S. Battle
    • 1
  1. 1.Prevention Research CenterPacific Institute for Research and EvaluationOaklandUSA
  2. 2.Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations