Abstract
In this work, various non-zeolitic catalysts were studied for the conversion of light naphtha into aromatics using a down-flow fixed bed reactor in a continuous mode operation. The physicochemical properties of the catalysts were determined using powder X-ray diffractometer, N2 sorption, atomic absorption spectroscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, NH3-temperature programmed desorption and thermogravimetric analysis techniques. Among the several non-zeolitic catalysts such as Al-SBA-15, mesoporous silica-alumina, SAPO-34, and calcined K-10 montmorillonite clay, Al-SBA-15 exhibited high light naphtha conversion of about 45% with 55% selectivity for aromatics. The rest of the catalysts though gave lower conversion, showed higher selectivity of > 90% for aromatics with a very low formation of cracking side products. The catalytic performance of non-zeolitic catalysts was compared with that of HZSM-5. The synergistic effect of physicochemical parameters such as acidity, pore volume, and pore diameter on the aromatic yield was theoretically deduced by constructing a non-linear model using the combination of the catalyst properties. To explore nature and to understand the responsible active sites involved in the mechanism for the light naphtha transformation to aromatics, the model compounds such as n-pentane, n-hexane, and cyclohexane were tested over mesoporous silica-alumina catalyst. The reaction parameters, viz. temperature, ratio of carrier gas to hydrocarbon, and weight hourly space velocity were optimized for obtaining a high aromatic yield. The 24 h time on stream study showed that the catalyst is resistant to coking and was able to retain its activity and selectivity for aromatics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antos, G.J., Aitani, A.M., Parera, J.M.: Marcel Dekker Inc (1995)
J.L. Hodala, A.B. Halgeri, G.V. Shanbhag, R.S. Reddy, N.V. Choudary, P.V. Rao, M.G. SriGanesh, G. Shah, R. Ravishankar, ChemistrySelect 1, 2515–2521 (2016)
N. Viswanadham, J. Gupta, G.M. Dhar, M. Garg, Energy Fuels. 20, 1806–1814 (2006)
M. Guisnet, N. Gnep, D. Aittaleb, Y. Doyemet, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 87, 255–270 (1992)
M. Scurrell, Appl. Catal. 41, 89–98 (1988)
N. Viswanadham, A. Pradhan, N. Ray, S. Vishnoi, U. Shanker, T.P. Rao, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 137, 225–233 (1996)
M. Guisnet, P. Magnoux, Appl. Catal. 54, 1–27 (1989)
L. Li, X. Mu, W. Liu, X. Kong, S. Fan, Z. Mi, C.J. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. 126, 14330–14333 (2014)
E.A. Uslamin, H. Saito, Y. Sekine, E.J. Hensen, N. Kosinov, Catal. Today. 369, 184–192 (2021)
L.M. Lubango, M.S. Scurrell, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 235, 265–272 (2002)
K. Sharifi, R. Halladj, S.J. Royaee, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 59, 188–206 (2020)
P.T. Huyen, V.D. Trinh, M.T. Portilla, C. Martínez, Catal. Today. 366, 97–102 (2021)
A. Corma, Catal. Lett. 22, 33–52 (1993)
J.M. Thomas, Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis. 2., completely revised and enlarged Edition, vol. 1–8. Edited by G. Ertl, H. Knözinger, F. Schüth, and J. Weitkamp. Wiley Online Library (2009)
N.Y. Chen, T.Y. Yan, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev. 25, 151–155 (1986)
Y. Ono, Catal Rev. 34, 179–226 (1992)
P. Mériaudeau, C. Naccache, Catal Rev. 39, 5–48 (1997)
N. Viswanadham, S. Saxena, M. Kumar, Pet Sci Technol. 29, 393–400 (2011)
A. Ishihara, Y. Kodama, T. Hashimoto, Fuel Process. Technol. 213, 106679 (2021)
W. Wannapakdee, D. Suttipat, P. Dugkhuntod, T. Yutthalekha, A. Thivasasith, P. Kidkhunthod, S. Nokbin, S. Pengpanich, J. Limtrakul, C. Wattanakit, Fuel 236, 1243–1253 (2019)
N. Rahimi, R. Karimzadeh, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 398, 1–17 (2011)
Ravishankar, R., Rao, P.V.C., Choudary, N.V., Shanbhag, G.V., Janardhan, H.L., Halgeri, A.B., Gandham, S.: US Patents (2019)
A. Maity, S. Chaudhari, J.J. Titman, V. Polshettiwar, Nat. Commun. 11, 1–12 (2020)
N. Viswanadham, R. Kamble, S.K. Saxena, M. Singh, Catal. Commun. 9, 1894–1897 (2008)
K. Lee, S. Lee, Y. Jun, M. Choi, J. Catal. 347, 222–230 (2017)
P. Tamizhdurai, A. Ramesh, P.S. Krishnan, S. Narayanan, K. Shanthi, S. Sivasanker, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 287, 192–202 (2019)
A. Martins, J.M. Silva, J. Blanchard, P. Massiani, M. Breysse, F.R. Ribeiro, M.F. Ribeiro, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 82, 139–147 (2004)
J. Du, H. Xu, J. Shen, J. Huang, W. Shen, D. Zhao, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 296, 186–193 (2005)
J. Yu, R. Wang, S. Ren, X. Sun, C. Chen, Q. Ge, W. Fang, J. Zhang, H. Xu, D.S. Su, ChemCatChem 4, 1376–1381 (2012)
N. Kulal, R. Vetrivel, C.S. Gopinath, R.K. Ravindran, V.N. Rao, M. Shetty, R. Shrikanth, D. Rangappa, G.V. Shanbhag, Chem. Eng. J. 419, 129439 (2021)
N.A.A. Talib, F. Salam, N.A. Yusof, S.A.A. Ahmad, Y. Sulaiman, RSC Adv. 7, 11101–11110 (2017)
N.A. Alba, Z.J. Du, K.A. Catt, T.D. Kozai, X.T. Cui, Biosensors 5, 618–646 (2015)
U. Lange, N.V. Roznyatovskaya, V.M. Mirsky, Anal. Chim. Acta. 614, 1–26 (2008)
M. Cui, Z. Song, Y. Wu, B. Guo, X. Fan, X. Luo, Biosens. Bioelectron. 79, 736–741 (2016)
G.V. Shanbhag, S. Kumbar, S. Halligudi, J Mol Catal A Chem. 284, 16–23 (2008)
G. Crépeau, V. Montouillout, A. Vimont, L. Mariey, T. Cseri, F. Maugé, J. Phys. Chem. B. 110, 15172–15185 (2006)
A. Prakash, S. Unnikrishnan, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 90, 2291–2296 (1994)
S. Wolfram, The MATHEMATICA ® Book, Version 3 (Cambridge University Press, 1996)
S.P. Viswanathan, B.N. Narayanan, Z. Yaakob, S. Padikkaparambil, M. Mohammad, React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 111, 335–345 (2014)
A. Vinu, V. Murugesan, W. Böhlmann, M. Hartmann, J. Phys. Chem. B. 108, 11496–11505 (2004)
W. Shujie, J. Huang, W. Tonghao, S. Ke, W. Hongsu, X. Lihong, X. Haiyan, X. Ling, G. Jingqi, K. Qiubin, Chinese. J. Catal. 27, 9–14 (2006)
C. Hu, H. Zhang, S. Wu, R. Xiao, Energy Convers. Manag. 210, 112678 (2020)
T. Fukunaga, H. Katsuno, Catal. Surv. Asia. 14, 96–102 (2010)
T. Hughes, W. Buss, P. Tamm, R. Jacobson, Stud Surf Sci Catal (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(09)60940-X
J. Jarvis, P. He, A. Wang, H. Song, Fuel 236, 1301–1310 (2019)
Y. Jiang, J. Huang, W. Dai, M. Hunger, Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 39, 116–141 (2011)
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding from Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), India and thank HPCL management for all the support for this research work. GVS acknowledges Admar Mutt Education Foundation (AMEF), Bengaluru for providing facilities to carry out this research and Vision Group on Science and Technology (VGST), Govt. of Karnataka for the analytical facility for BET surface area analysis.
Funding
This study was supported by the Hindustan Petroleum Green Research and Development Centre (HPGRDC) and the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SS and BJV: Conducting experiments, methodology, data acquisition, validation, formal analysis, and writing the original draft. GK: Synthesis of a few catalysts and reactions. RRK and SS: Development of theoretical modeling. RSR, SPM, and CB: Catalyst characterization and review of the work. GV and RR: Project administration, resources, scientific inputs and review of the work. GVS: Conceptual idea, fund acquisition, project administration, supervision, and manuscript correction.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sujith, S., Vaishnavi, B.J., Kamath, G. et al. Highly selective aromatization of light naphtha using mesoporous aluminosilicate catalysts and theoretical model for predicting activity. J Porous Mater 30, 1069–1083 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-022-01404-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-022-01404-0