Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of radiocarbon and OSL dating methods for a Late Quaternary sediment core from Lake Ulaan, Mongolia

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Journal of Paleolimnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both radiocarbon and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating methods were applied to test their suitability for establishing a chronology of arid-zone lacustrine sediments using a 5.88-m-long core drilled from Lake Ulaan, southern Mongolia. Although the radiocarbon and OSL ages agree in some samples, the radiocarbon ages are older than the corresponding OSL ages at the 550-cm depth horizon (late Pleistocene) and in the 100–300-cm interval (early to late Holocene). In the early to late Holocene, radiocarbon ages are consistently older than OSL ages by 4,100–5,800 years, and in the late Pleistocene by 2,700–3,000 years. Grain-size analysis of early to late Holocene sediments and one late Pleistocene sediment sample (550-cm depth) indicates that eolian processes were the dominant sediment-transport mechanism. Also, two late Pleistocene sediments samples (from 400- to 500-cm depths) are interpreted to have been deposited by both eolian and glaciofluvial processes. Accordingly, the radiocarbon ages that were older than the corresponding OSL ages during the Holocene seem to have been a consequence of the influx of 14C-deficient carbon delivered from adjacent soils and Paleozoic carbonate rocks by the westerly winds, a process that is also active today. In addition to the input of old reworked carbon by eolian processes, the late Pleistocene sediments were also influenced by old carbon delivered by deglacial meltwater. The results of this study suggest that when eolian sediment transport is suspected, especially in lakes of arid environments, the OSL dating method is superior to the radiocarbon dating method, as it eliminates a common ‘old-carbon’ error problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aravena R, Warner B, MacDonald GM, Hanf KI (1992) Carbon isotope composition of lake sediments in relation to lake productivity and radiocarbon dating. Quat Res 37:333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bøtter-Jensen L, Bulur E, Duller GAT, Murray AS (2000) Advances in luminescence instrument systems. Radiat Meas 32:523–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton L, Moran SR (1982) Chronology of late Wisconsin glaciations in middle North America. Quat Sci Rev 1:55–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler AJ, Gillespie R, Hedges REM (1986) Radiocarbon dating of sediments. Radiocarbon 28:441–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm EC, Maher LJ Jr, Nelson DM (2009) The magnitude of error in conventional bulk-sediment radiocarbon dates from central North America. Quat Res 72:301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunert J, Lehmkuhl F, Walther M (2000) Paleoclimatic evolution of the Uvs Nuur basin and adjacent areas (Western Mongolia). Quat Int 65/66:171–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones KPN, McCave IN, Patel PD (1988) A computer interfaced sedigraph for modal size analysis of fine-grained sediment. Sedimentology 35:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karrow PF, Anderson TW (1975) Palynological study of lake sediment profiles from southwestern New Brunswick: discussion. Can J Earth Sci 12:1808–1812

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee MK, Lee YI, Lim HS, Lee JI, Yoon HI (2009) Climatic changes during the Holocene and late Pleistocene recorded in Ulaan Lake sediments, Mongolia. In: Proceedings the 64th annual meeting geological society Korea 64, p 60

  • Liu XJ, Lai ZP, Fan QS, Long H, Sun YJ (2010) Timing for high lake levels of Qinghai Lake in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau since the last interglaciation based on quartz OSL dating. Quat Geochronol 5:218–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long H, Lai ZP, Wang NA, Zhang JR (2011) A combined luminescence and radiocarbon dating study of Holocene lacustrine sediments from arid northern China. Quat Geochronol 6:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald GM, Beuken RP, Kieser WE, Vitt DH (1987) Comparative radiocarbon dating of terrestrial plant macrofossils and aquatic moss from the “ice-free corridor” of western Canada. Geology 15:837–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray AS, Wintle AG (2000) Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiat Meas 32:57–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray AS, Wintle AG (2003) The single aliquot of regenerative dose protocol: potential for improvements in reliability. Radiat Meas 37:377–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray AS, Marten R, Johnston A, Martin P (1987) Analysis for naturally occurring radionuclides at environmental concentrations by gamma spectrometry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 115:263–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambudiri EMV, Teller JT, Last WM (1980) Pre-quaternary microfossils—a guide to errors in radiocarbon dating. Geology 8:123–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olley JM, Murray AS, Roberts RG (1996) The effects of disequilibria in the uranium and thorium decay chains on burial dose rates in fluvial sediments. Quat Sci Rev 15:751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson IU (1986) Radiometric dating. In: Berglund BE (ed) Handbook of Holocene palaeoecology and palaeohydrology. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 273–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott JR, Hutton JT (1988) Cosmic ray and gamma ray dosimetry for TL and ESR. Int J Radiat Appl Instrum Part D Nucl Tracks Radiat Meas 14:223–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott JR, Hutton JT (1994) Cosmic ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and ESR dating: large depths and long-term time variations. Radiat Meas 23:497–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey CB (2009) Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51:337–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees-Jones J (1995) Optical dating of young sediments using fine-grain quartz. Anc TL 13:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer PJ, Baillie MGL, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Ramsey CB, Buck CE, Burr GS, Edwards RL, Friedrich M, Grootes PM, Guilderson TP, Hajdas I, Heaton TJ, Hogg AG, Hughen KA, Kaiser KF, Kromer B, McCormac FG, Manning SW, Reimer RW, Richards DA, Southon JR, Talamo S, Turney CSM, van der Plicht J, Weyhenmeyer CE (2009) IntCal09 and marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years CAL BP. Radiocarbon 51:1111–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs AC (1984) Major carbon-14 deficiency in modern snail shells from southern Nevada springs. Science 224:58–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schidlowski M, Hayes JM, Kaplan IR (1983) Isotopic inferences of ancient biochemistries: carbon, sulfur, hydrogen and nitrogen. In: Schopf JW (ed) Earth’s earliest biosphere: its origin and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 149–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevastyanov DV, Dorofeyk NI (2005) A short review: limnological and paleolimnological researches in Mongolia carried out by joint Russian-Mongolian expeditions. J Mt Sci 2:86–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Z, Mauz B, Lang A, Bloemendal J, Dearing J (2007) Optical dating of Holocene lake sediments: elimination of the feldspar component in fine silt quartz samples. Quat Geochronol 2:150–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes S, Gaylord DR (1993) Optical dating of Holocene dune sands in the Ferris Dune Field, Wyoming. Quat Res 39:274–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes S, Thomas DSG, Washington R (1997) Multiple episodes of aridity in southern Africa since the last interglacial period. Nature 388:154–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland DG (1980) Problems of radiocarbon dating in newly deglaciated terrain: examples from the Scottish Lateglacial. In: Lowe JJ, Gray JM, Robinson JE (eds) Studies in the Lateglacial of north-west Europe. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford RJ, Heegaard E, Birks HJB (2004) The intercept is a poor estimate of a calibrated radiocarbon age. Holocene 14:296–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JV, Fritz P, Karrow PF, Warner BG (1983) Isotopic and geochemical composition of marl lake waters and implications for radiocarbon dating of marl lake sediments. Can J Earth Sci 20:599–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintle AG, Murray AS (2006) A review of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single-aliquot regeneration dating protocols. Radiat Meas 41:369–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Lu Y, Wang C, Chen J, Liu J, Mao H (2010) ReOSL dating of aeolian and fluvial sediments from Nihewan Basin, northern China and its environmental application. Quat Geochronol 5:159–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman DW (1971) Thermoluminescence dating using fine grains from pottery. Archaeometry 13:29–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Korea Polar Research Institute Project (PE10010), the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program (RACS 2010-3007, PN10040), and partly by a SNU-SEES BK21 program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Il Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, M.K., Lee, Y.I., Lim, H.S. et al. Comparison of radiocarbon and OSL dating methods for a Late Quaternary sediment core from Lake Ulaan, Mongolia. J Paleolimnol 45, 127–135 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-010-9484-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-010-9484-7

Keywords

Navigation