Skip to main content

Sulfuric Acid and Gibberellic Acid (GA3) Treatment Combined with Exposure to Cold Temperature Modulates Seed Proteins during Breaking of Dormancy to Germination in Tilia miqueliana

Abstract

Tilia miqueliana produces woody seeds that exhibit deep dormancy. In this study, we used cell biology methods, including Paraffin section determination and Coomassie brilliant blue staining, as well as proteomics-based methods, including two-dimensional electrophoresis with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation tandem time-of-flight mass spectrometry (2DE–MALDI–TOF/TOF), to examine the effects of H2SO4–GA3 and cold stratification (3 °C) treatment on proteins during dormancy release and germination in T. miqueliana seeds. The results revealed that during cold stratification, the area and density of proteins in the endosperm cells of H2SO4–GA3-treated seeds were significantly altered. Total protein content was continuously consumed and utilised. Storage proteins (albumin, globulin, prolamin, and glutelin) were degraded to varying degrees. Sixteen differential proteins were identified using mass spectrometry. Kyoto encyclopedia of genes (KEGG) pathway analysis revealed that the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, secondary metabolite biosynthesis, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, and metabolic pathways were critical during dormancy release and germination. Gene ontology analysis and KEGG pathway annotation of differential proteins in the co-expression network indicated that the differential proteins are implicated in photosynthesis, glucose metabolism, biosynthesis of plant hormones, and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis. Synergistic interactions among these proteins accelerated dormancy release and germination. Therefore, H2SO4–GA3 cold stratification treatment is the best method for achieving rapid dormancy release and increasing the germination rate of T. miqueliana seeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Code Availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD021999. Submission details: (1) Project Name: Key protein variations during seeds germination in Tilia miqueliana, (2) Project accession: PXD021999, (3) Project DOI: Not applicable. Reviewer account details: (1) Username: reviewer_pxd021999@ebi.ac.uk, (2) Password: DIyJPxwv.

References

  1. 1.

    Yao W et al (2018) Effects of gibberellic acid and magnetically treated water on physiological characteristics of Tilia miqueliana seeds. Can J For Res 48(5):554–558

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zhang G (2017) Physiology and proteomics analysis of Phellodendron amurense Rupr. seed during dormancy release. Northeast For Univ 2017(6):1–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Née G et al (2017) The release of dormancy, a wake-up call for seeds to germinate. Curr Opin Plant Biol 35:8–14

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Feng HY et al (2019) Aleurone layer content and component analysis of different kernels color maize. J Anhui Agric Sci 47(21):170–174

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Isaacson T et al (2006) Sample extraction techniques for enhanced proteomic analysis of plant tissues. Nat Protoc 1(2):769

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72(1–2):248–254

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    O’Farrell PH (1975) High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem 250(10):4007–4021

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rabilloud T et al (2010) Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: past, present and future. J Proteomics 73(11):2064–2077

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sherman BT et al (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4(1):44

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Li SB et al (2008) Role of cysteine proteinase in programmed cell death of plant. Plan Phys Com 44(2):345–349

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wang DF et al (2015) Research advances of caspase in plant programmed cell death. J WF Univ 15(6):19–22

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Liu YF et al (2019) Research progress on the effects of catalase on plant stress tolerance. Barl Cere Sci 36(1):5–8

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dietz KJ (2003) Plant peroxiredoxins. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54(1): 93–107

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jing LW (2005) Research progress of plant peroxidized protein. J Jinan Voca Coll 50(05): 51–54

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lu Q et al (2013) Research advances on the mechanism of glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in plant. Biot Bull 8:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Müller S (2015) Plant intracellular transport: tracing functions of the retrograde kinesin. Curr Biol 25(18):R808–R810

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rudenko GN et al (2001) Expression and post-transcriptional regulation of maize transposable element MuDR and its derivatives. Plant Cell 13(3):553–570

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ono A et al (2002) Subcellular localization of MURA and MURB proteins encoded by the maize MuDR transposon. Plant Mol Biol 50(4–5):599–611

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhang X et al (2011) Characterization of an AtCCX5 gene from Arabidopsis thaliana that involves in high-affinity K+ uptake and Na+ transport in yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 414(1):96–100

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lutfiyya LL et al (2007) Phylogenetic and expression analysis of sucrose phosphate synthase isozymes in plants. J Plant Physiol 164(7):923–933

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Castleden CK et al (2004) Evolution and function of the sucrose-phosphate synthase gene families in wheat and other grasses. Plant Physiol 135(3):1753–1764

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sang J et al (2006) Duplication and combination of P- loop containing nucleotide triphosphate hydrolases superfamily. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 011(003):577–580

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kawamura Y et al (2003) Systematic analyses of P-loop containing nucleotide triphosphate hydrolase superfamily based on sequence, structure and function. Gen Info 14:581–582

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li JP (2011) Cloning and function alanalysis of FLA8 gene of Kinesin - 2 subunit from Dunaliella salina. Zhengzhou Univ 2011(1):1–65

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gallardo K et al (2001) Proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis seed germination and priming. Plant physiol 126(2):835–848

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Jamsheer KM et al (2015) Expression of Arabidopsis FCS-like zinc finger genes is differentially regulated by sugars, cellular energy level, and abiotic stress. Front Plant Sci 6:746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Luo LF et al (1990) Research on rapid germination and seedling of Tilia amurensis seeds. J Northeast Fore univ 18(2):103–108

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chen Q et al (2005) Effects of different treatment on seed dormancy and seeding growth of Birch-leaf pear. J Tarim Univ 01:28–30

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yang YZ et al (2006) The dynamic changes of proteins and activities of nitrogen metabolism enzymes in Ginkgo biloba seeds during germination. J Nanjing For Univ 30(4):119–122

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Meng XX (1997) Studies on storage protein in soybean seeds. J Northeast Agric Univ 28(2):201–207

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Guerrieri N et al (2018) Cereals proteins. Proteins in food processing. Wood Pub Seri Food Sci Tech Nut 2018:223–244

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhang Y et al (2014) The research of storage protein in four kinds of Stylo seed germination. J Anhui Agric Sci 42(36):12810–12813

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tan-Wilson AL et al (2012) Mobilization of seed protein reserves. Physiol Plantarum 145(1): 140–153

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Shewry PR et al (1995) Seed storage proteins: structures and biosynthesis. Plant Cell 7(7):945

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tian XR et al (2003) Programmed cell death during seed development and germination. Acta Bota Yun 25(05):579–588

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wu HM et al (2013) Programmed cell death of aleurone layer of cereal crop seeds. Prat Ltur Sci 30(05):777–782

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Li J et al (2016) Proteomics of seed development and germination process. Seed 5:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chen QZ et al (2016) Advances in heat shock proteins of seed. Prata Sci 33(1):136–143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kiang JG et al (1998) Heat shock protein 70 kDa: molecular biology, biochemistry, and physiology. Pharmacol Therapeut 80(2): 183–201

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Koo HJ et al (2015) Small heat shock proteins can release light dependence of tobacco seed during germination. Plant Physiol 167(3):1030–1038

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zhao M et al (2018) Relationship between seed storage reserve and seed germination. Soil Crop 7(2):189–200

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Meng LB (2008) Proteomic research during maize (Zea mays L.) seed germination. Northeast For Univ 2008:1–154

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cui Y et al (2019) Cloning of IDP2557 gene encoding maize short-chain dehydrogenase and identification of its drought resistance. Mol Plant Breed 22(17):7300–7305

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ma XF et al (2018) Status and progress on functions of plant enolase gene ENO2. J Plant Genet Resour 19(06):1030–1037

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Donlin MJ et al (1995) Tissue-specific accumulation of MURB, a protein encoded by MuDR, the autonomous regulator of the Mutator transposable element family. Plant Cell 7(12):1989–2000

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    He Y et al (2001) Networking senescence-regulating pathways by using Arabidopsis enhancer trap lines. Plant Physiol 126(2):707–716

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    He Y et al (2004) A novel zinc-finger protein with a proline-rich domain mediates ABA-regulated seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant mol biol 54(1):1–9

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Laxmi A (2014) DUF581 is plant specific FCS-like zinc finger involved in protein-protein interaction. PLoS ONE 9(6):e99074

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lei L (2016) Proteomic analysis on germination of Davidia involucrate seeds. Hubei Univ Nat 1:1–104

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, and Co-innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Southern Tree Inspection Center National Forestry Administration.

Funding

This work was financed by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YBS conceived the original screening and research plans; YW performed the experiments; YW designed the experiments and analyzed the data; YW conceived the project and wrote the article with contributions of all the authors. YW agrees to serve as the author responsible for contact and ensures communication. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Bao Shen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

We strictly comply with the Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, and also abide by Law of the People's Republic of China on Wildlife Protection. Research permission on Tilia miqueliana tree has been obtained from Jiangsu Wildlife Protection Station. The collection of experimental intact seeds was approved by the Management Office of Huang Zangyu National Forest Park in Anhui Province, China.

Consent for Publication

All the authors supported the publication of the article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 153 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Shen, Y.B. Sulfuric Acid and Gibberellic Acid (GA3) Treatment Combined with Exposure to Cold Temperature Modulates Seed Proteins during Breaking of Dormancy to Germination in Tilia miqueliana. Protein J (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-021-10018-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dormancy release
  • Germination
  • H2SO4–GA3 cold stratification treatment
  • Proteome
  • Storage protein
  • Tilia miqueliana