Abstract
In this paper, we exploit the potential offered by site-directed mutagenesis to achieve direct adsorption of horse cyt c on a bare gold electrode surface. To this issue, the side chain T102 has been replaced by a cysteine. T102 is close to the surface exposed C-terminal residue (E104), therefore the T102C mutation is expected to generate an exposed cysteine side chain able to facilitate protein binding to the electrode via the sulphur atom (analogously to what observed for yeast iso-1-cyt c). Scanning Tunnelling and Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy measurements show that the T102C mutant stably adsorbs on an Au(111) surface and retains the morphological characteristics of the native form. Cyclic voltammetry reveals that the adsorbed variant is electroactive; however, the heterogeneous electron transfer with the electrode surface is slower than that observed for yeast iso-1-cyt c. We ascribe it to differences in the tertiary architecture of the two proteins, characterized by different flexibility and stability. In particular, the region where the N- and C-terminal helices get in contact (and where the mutation occurs) is analyzed in detail, since the interactions between these two helices are considered crucial for the stability of the overall protein fold.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- cyt c :
-
cytochrome c
- eT:
-
electron-transfer
- STM:
-
Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy
- TMAFM:
-
Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy
References
Alliata D., Andolfi L., Cannistraro S. (2004). Ultramicroscopy 101: 231–240
Andersen J. E. T., Møller P., Pedersen M. V., Ulstrup J. (1995). Surf. Sci. 325: 193–205
Andolfi L., Cannistraro S., Canters G. W., Facci P., Ficca A. G., Van Amsterdam I. M. C., Verbeet M. Ph (2002). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 399: 81–88
Andolfi L., Bruce D., Cannistraro S., Canters G. W., Davis J. J., Hill H. A. O., Crozier J., Verbeet, MPh., Wrathmell C. L., Astier Y. (2004). J. Electroanal. Chem. 565: 21–28
Banci L., Bertini I., Bren K. L., Gray H. B., Sompornpisut P., Turano P. (1997a). Biochemistry 36: 8992–9001
Banci L., Bertini I., Gray H. B., Luchinat C., Reddig T., Rosato A., Turano P. (1997b). Biochemistry 36: 9867–9877
Bianco P., Haladjian J., Draoui K. (1990). J. Electroanal. Chem. 279: 305–314
Bonanni B., Alliata D., Bizzarri A. R., Cannistraro S. (2003). Chem. Phys. Chem. 4: 1183–1188
Bonanni, B., Alliata, D., Andolfi, L., Bizzarri, A. R., and Cannistraro, S. (2004). In: Norris, C. P. (ed.), Surface Science Rersearch Development, Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, pp 1–73
Bortolotti C. A., Battistuzzi G., Borsari M., Facci P., Ranieri A., Sola M. (2006). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128: 5444–5451
Bushnell G. W., Louie G. V., Brayer G. D. (1990). J. Mol. Biol. 214: 585–595
Castner D. G., Ratner B. D. (2002). Surf. Sci. 500: 28–60
Colon W., Elove G. A., Wakem L. P., Sherman F., Roder H. (1996). Biochemistry 35: 5538–5549
Davis J. J., Morgan D. A., Wrathmell C. L., Zhao A. (2004). IEE Proc-Nanobiotechnol. 151: 37–47
Eddowes M. J., Hill H. A. O.(1979). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101: 4461–4464
Ferri T., Poscia A., Ascoli F., Santucci R. (1996). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1298: 102–108
Frew J. E., Hill H. A. O. (1988). Eur. J. Biochem. 172: 261–269
Friis E. P., Andersen J. E. T., Madsen L. L., Møller P., Nichols R. J., Olesen K. G., Ulstrup J. (1998). Electrochim. Acta 43: 2889–2897
Hansen A. G., Boisen A., Nielsen J. U., Wackerbarth H., Chorkendorff I., Andersen J. E., Zhang J., Ulstrup J. (2003). Langmuir 19: 3419–3427
Heering H. A., Wiertz F. G., Dekker C., de Vries S. (2004). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126: 11103–11112
Hill H. A. O., Hunt N. I., Bond A. M. (1997). J. Electroanal. Chem. 436: 17–25
Kudera M., Hill H. A. O., Dobson P. J., Leigh P. A., William S. (2001). Sensors 1: 18–28
Lett C. M., Rosu-Myles M. D., Frey H. E., Guillemette J. G. (1999). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1432: 40–48
Louie G. V., Brayer G. D. (1990). J. Mol. Biol. 214: 527–555
Louie G. V., Hutcheon W. L., Brayer G. D. (1988). J. Mol. Biol. 199: 295–314
Marcus R. A., Sutin N. (1985). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 811: 265–322
Patel C. N., Lind M. C., Pielak G. (2001). Protein Expr. Purif. 22: 220–224
Qi P. X., Beckman R. A., Wand A. J. (1996) Biochemistry 35: 12275–12286
Rumbley J., Hoang L., Mayne L., Englander S. W. (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 98: 105–112
Santucci R., Reinhard H., Brunori M. (1988). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110: 8536–8537
Santucci R., Faraoni A., Campanella L., Tranchida G., Brunori M. (1991). Biochem. J. 273: 783–786
Santucci R., Fiorucci L., Sinibaldi F., Polizio F., Desideri A., Ascoli F. (2000). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 379: 331–336
Senn H., Wuthrich K. (1985). Q. Rev. Biophys. 18: 111–134
Sinibaldi F., Piro M. C., Howes B. D., Smulevich G., Ascoli F., Santucci R. (2003). Biochemistry 42: 7604–7610
Stellwagen E., Cass R. (1974). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 60: 371–375
Szucs A., Novak M. (1995). J. Electroanal. Chem. 383: 75–84
Willner I. (2002). Science 298: 2407–2408
Zhou Y., Nagaoka T., Zhu G. (1999). Biophys. Chem. 79: 55–62
Acknowledgements
Research funded in part by grants from Italian MIUR (PRIN 2004 055484). L. Andolfi acknowledges the Research Grant ‘‘Rientro dei Cervelli’’ from MIUR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andolfi, L., Caroppi, P., Bizzarri, A.R. et al. Nanoscopic and Redox Characterization of Engineered Horse Cytochrome c Chemisorbed on a Bare Gold Electrode. Protein J 26, 271–279 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-006-9069-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-006-9069-5