Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) theory and the Guggenheim–Anderson–de Boer (GAB) equation for concentration-dependent, non-saturable cell–cell interaction dose-responses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To systematically assess the characteristics and potential utility of the Guggenheim–Anderson–de Boer (GAB) formulation of the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) equation from physical chemistry for modeling dose-responses in pharmaceutical applications. The GAB–BET equation was derived using pharmacodynamic first principles to underscore the assumptions involved and the functional characteristics of the equation were investigated. The properties of the GAB–BET equation were compared to the familiar Michaelis–Menten and Hill equations and its utility for pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling was assessed by fitting the model equations to four diverse data sets from the literature. The results enabled the salient characteristics of the unconstrained GAB–BET equation and the corresponding GAB–BET equation with finite layers for modeling pharmacodynamic effects to be critically assessed. The GAB–BET approach allows for the accumulation of heterogeneous stacks containing multiple cells or molecules at the target site. The unconstrained GAB–BET equation is capable of describing concentration-dependent dose–response curves that do not exhibit saturation. The GAB–BET equation for finite layers exhibits saturation but increases more slowly than the comparable Michaelis–Menten and Hill equations. The fitting results of the model equations to literature data sets provided support for key aspects of the GAB–BET model. The GAB–BET equation may be a useful method for mechanistic modeling of diverse immune processes and drugs that recruit immune cell activity at the site of action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klinger M, Brandl C, Zugmaier G, Hijazi Y, Bargou RC, Topp MS, Gokbuget N, Neumann S, Goebeler M, Viardot A, Stelljes M, Bruggemann M, Hoelzer D, Degenhard E, Nagorsen D, Baeuerle PA, Wolf A, Kufer P (2012) Immunopharmacologic response of patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia to continuous infusion of T cell-engaging CD19/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody blinatumomab. Blood 119(26):6226–6233. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-01-400515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali S, Moreau A, Melchiorri D, Camarero J, Josephson F, Olimpier O, Bergh J, Karres D, Tzogani K, Gisselbrecht C, Pignatti F (2020) Blinatumomab for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the first bispecific T-cell engager antibody to be approved by the EMA for minimal residual disease. Oncologist 25(4):e709–e715. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gonzalez-Exposito R, Semiannikova M, Griffiths B, Khan K, Barber LJ, Woolston A, Spain G, von Loga K, Challoner B, Patel R, Ranes M, Swain A, Thomas J, Bryant A, Saffery C, Fotiadis N, Guettler S, Mansfield D, Melcher A, Powles T, Rao S, Watkins D, Chau I, Matthews N, Wallberg F, Starling N, Cunningham D, Gerlinger M (2019) CEA expression heterogeneity and plasticity confer resistance to the CEA-targeting bispecific immunotherapy antibody cibisatamab (CEA-TCB) in patient-derived colorectal cancer organoids. J Immunother Cancer 7(1):101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0575-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60(2):309–319. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01269a023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson RB (1946) Modifications of the Brunauer, Emmett and Teller equation. J Am Chem Soc 68(4):686–691. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01208a049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Boer JH (1953) The dynamical character of adsorption. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guggenheim EA (1966) Applications of statistical mechanics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J, Sing K (1999) Chapter 4 - Interpretation of physisorption isotherms at the gas–solid interface. In: Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J, Sing K (eds) Adsorption by powders and porous solids. Academic Press, London, pp 93–115

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill TL (1996) Adsorption from a one-dimensional lattice gas and the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller equation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(25):14328–14332. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.25.14328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ismail M (2019) PinPoint digitizer. https://mhismail.github.io/PinPoint-Landing/

  11. Luconi M, Muratori M, Forti G, Baldi E (1999) Identification and characterization of a novel functional estrogen receptor on human sperm membrane that interferes with progesterone effects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84(5):1670–1678. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.84.5.5670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D'Argenio DZ, Schlumitzky A, Wang X (2009) ADAPT 5 user’s guide: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic systems analysis software. Biomedical Simulations Resource. University of Southern California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dezorella N, Kay S, Baron S, Shapiro M, Porat Z, Deutsch V, Herishanu Y, Katz BZ (2016) Measurement of lymphocyte aggregation by flow cytometry-physiological implications in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 90(3):257–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kong HJ, Boontheekul T, Mooney DJ (2006) Quantifying the relation between adhesion ligand-receptor bond formation and cell phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(49):18534–18539. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605960103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelemen RK, Rajakaruna H, Cockburn IA, Ganusov VV (2019) Clustering of activated CD8 T cells around malaria-infected hepatocytes is rapid and is driven by antigen-specific cells. Front Immunol 10:2153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gregg SJ, Jacobs J (1948) An examination of the adsorption theory of Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller, and Brunauer, Deming, Deming and Teller. Trans Farad Soc 44:574–588. https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9484400574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Blahovec J, Yanniotis S (2008) GAB Generalized equation for sorption phenomena. Food Bioprocess Technol 1(1):82–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-007-0012-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cockburn IA, Amino R, Kelemen RK, Kuo SC, Tse SW, Radtke A, Mac-Daniel L, Ganusov VV, Zavala F, Menard R (2013) In vivo imaging of CD8+ T cell-mediated elimination of malaria liver stages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(22):9090–9095. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1303858110

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Langmuir I (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surface of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc 40(9):1361–1402. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02242a004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ebadi A, Soltan Mohammadzadeh JS, Khudiev A (2009) What is the correct form of BET isotherm for modeling liquid phase adsorption? Adsorption 15(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-009-9151-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta KK, Khan MA, Singh SK (2020) Constitutive inflammatory cytokine storm: a major threat to human health. J Interferon Cytokine Res 40(1):19–23. https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.2019.0085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank JimB, an online contributor at Mathematica Stack Exchange who helped us troubleshoot the maximum likelihood estimation for the probability distribution function of the BET equation.

Funding

Murali Ramanathan received research funding from the National Institutes of Health. He has also received research funding from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Research and Development and the Department of Defense Congressionally-Directed Research Program: Multiple Sclerosis Research Program (MS190096). These are unrelated to the research presented in this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VAN—Data analysis, manuscript preparation. MR—Study concept and design, data analysis, manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murali Ramanathan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 185 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, V.A., Ramanathan, M. Application of Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) theory and the Guggenheim–Anderson–de Boer (GAB) equation for concentration-dependent, non-saturable cell–cell interaction dose-responses. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 47, 561–572 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-020-09708-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-020-09708-x

Keywords

Navigation