Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Minds@Work: A New Manualized Intervention to Improve Job Tenure in Psychosis Based on Scoping Review and Logic Model

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction A significant proportion of people experiencing psychosis are unemployed, despite a strong desire to work. Current supported employment programs appear effective in helping them obtain employment, yet job tenure remains an arduous challenge. The objective of this study was to review the literature and model the results to inform the development of a new manualized group psychosocial intervention—‘Minds@Work’—aimed specifically at improving job tenure in psychosis. Methods The study was registered on the Open Science Framework platform (https://osf.io/he68z). The literature was searched in Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and Cochrane Library databases for studies examining predictors of job tenure in psychosis and existing occupational psychosocial interventions. Data were extracted using a pre-established form and synthesized using logic models. Results A total of 94 studies were included and their findings were modeled using different categories: intervention typologies, mechanisms of action, predictors of job tenure, outcomes and contextual factors. The ‘Minds@Work’ program was built based on these modeled findings and aimed to target specific predictors of job tenure while addressing some of the limitations of existing interventions. The program uses evidence-based techniques and is divided into 9 modules covering 4 themes: positive psychology (motivation, character strengths, self-compassion), neurocognitive remediation (attention, memory, problem-solving), cognitive biases training (jumping to conclusions, defeatists beliefs, theory of mind, attributional styles) and socioemotional coping skills (emotion regulation, communication). Conclusions Once validated, this new program is meant to be used either as a stand-alone intervention or integrated in supported employment initiatives, by employment specialists or healthcare workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Harnois G, Gabriel P. Mental health and work: impact, issues and good practice. Geneva: WHO; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Westcott C, et al. Interest in employment among people with Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2015;18(2):187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Statistics Canada, Table 12-10-0051-01 Job tenure by type of work (full- and part-time), annual data 2018. Government of Canada

  4. Suijkerbuijk YB, et al. Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severemental illness, a networkmeta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;9:1–214.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sauvé G, Lepage M, Corbière M. Impacts of vocational programs integrating cognitive remediation on job tenure in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Ann Med Psychol. 2018;177(6):534–543.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carmona VR, et al. Employment outcomes for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2017;30(3):345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drake RE, Bond GR, Becker DR. IPS principles. In: Drake RE, Bond GR, Becker DR, editors. Individual placement and support: an evidence-based approach to supported employment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 33–46.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. McGurk SR, et al. Cognitive remediation for vocational rehabilitation nonresponders. Schizophr Res. 2016;175(1–3):48–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lecomte T, et al. Group cognitive behaviour therapy for supported employment—results of a randomized controlled cohort trial. Schizophr Res. 2020;215:126–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Corbière M, et al. Work accommodations in canadian social firms: supervisors’ and workers’ perspectives. Can J Commun Ment Health. 2019;38(1):37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ergül C, Ücok A. Negative symptom subgroups have different effects on the clinical course of schizophrenia after the first episode: a 24-month follow up study. Eur Psychiatry. 2015;30(1):14–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huff SW, Rapp CA, Campbell SR. “Every day is not always Jell-o”: a qualitative study of factors affecting job tenure. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2008;31(3):211–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Milfort R, et al. Barriers to employment among Social Security Disability Insurance beneficiaries in the Mental Health Treatment Study. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(12):1350–1352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajji TK, Miranda D, Mulsant BH. Cognition, function, and disability in patients with schizophrenia: a review of longitudinal studies. Can J Psychiatry. 2014;59(1):13–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rollins AL, et al. Workplace social networks and their relationship with job outcomes and other employment characteristics for people with severe mental illness. J Vocat Rehabil. 2011;35(3):243–252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Keefe RS, et al. Report on ISCTM consensus meeting on clinical assessment of response to treatment of cognitive impairment in Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42(1):19–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan JY, Hirai HW, Tsoi KK. Can computer-assisted cognitive remediation improve employment and productivity outcomes of patients with severe mental illness? A meta-analysis of prospective controlled trials. J Psychiatr Res. 2015;68:293–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rose D, et al. What do clients think of cognitive remediation therapy? A consumer-led investigation of satisfaction and side effects. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2008;11:181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Best MW, et al. Motivation and engagement during cognitive training for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophr Res Cogn. 2020;19:100151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bowie CR, et al. Cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: an expert working group white paper on core techniques. Schizophr Res. 2020;215:49–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Baxter SK, et al. Using logic model methods in systematic review synthesis: describing complex pathways in referral management interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(62):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peters MDJ, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119–2126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Winsper C, et al. How do recovery-oriented interventions contribute to personal mental health recovery? A systematic review and logic model. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020;76:101815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Glenton C, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(10):CD010414.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. W. K. Kellogg Foundation Team. Logic model development guide. 2004. https://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resource/2006/02/wk-kellogg-foundation-logic-model-development-guide. Accessed 2018.

  26. Tricco AC, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kinoshita Y, et al. Supported employment for adults with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(9):CD008297.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Butler AS, Gonzalez ML. Psychosocial interventions for mental and substance use disorders: a framework for establishing evidence-based standards. Washington: National Academies Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nicholson J, et al. Developing the WorkingWell mobile app to promote job tenure for individuals with serious mental illnesses. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2017;40(3):276–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamaguchi S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cognitive remediation and supported employment for people with mental illness: a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2017;47(1):53–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Twamley EW, et al. Compensatory cognitive training for people with severe mental illnesses in supported employment: a randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res. 2017;203:41–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kern RS, et al. Improving work outcome in supported employment for serious mental illness: results from 2 independent studies of errorless learning. Schizophr Bull. 2018;44(1):38–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ikebuchi E, et al. Does improvement of cognitive functioning by cognitive remediation therapy effect work outcomes in severe mental illness? A secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017;71:301–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McGurk SR, et al. Cognitive training for supported employment: 2–3 year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(3):437–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kern RS, et al. Errorless learning for training individuals with schizophrenia at a community mental health setting providing work experience. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35(4):807–815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsang HW, et al. Three year follow-up study of an integrated supported employment for individuals with severe mental illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010;44(1):49–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang GF, et al. Integrated supported employment for people with schizophrenia in Mainland China: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2017;71(6):7106165020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tsang HW, Li SM. Work-related social skills and job retention. In: Lloyd C, editor. Vocational rehabilitation and mental health. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 157–72.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Pinkham AE, et al. The social cognition psychometric evaluation study: results of the expert survey and RAND panel. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40(4):813–823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mervis JE, et al. Addressing defeatist beliefs in work rehabilitation. J Ment Health. 2016;25(4):366–371.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kukla M, et al. A pilot test of group based cognitive behavioral therapy to augment vocational services for persons with serious mental illness: feasibility and competitive work outcomes. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2018;206(5):310–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kukla M, Strasburger AM, Lysaker PH. A CBT intervention targeting competitive work outcomes for persons with mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2016;67(6):697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lecomte T, Corbière M, Lysaker PH. A group cognitive behavioral intervention for people registered in supported employment programs: CBT-SE. Encéphale. 2014;40(Suppl 2):S81–S90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lystad JU, et al. Cognitive remediation and occupational outcome in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a 2year follow-up study. Schizophr Res. 2017;185:122–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Au DW, et al. Effects of integrated supported employment plus cognitive remediation training for people with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders. Schizophr Res. 2015;166(1–3):297–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Choi K-H, Fiszdon JM, Bell MD. Beyond cognition: a longitudinal investigation of the role of motivation during a vocational rehabilitation program. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013;201(3):173–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bechi M, et al. Exploring predictors of work competence in schizophrenia: the role of theory of mind. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017;29(5):691–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Allen J, Fonagy P. Handbook of mentalization-based treatment. Chichester: Wiley; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Catalan A, et al. The relationship between theory of mind deficits and neurocognition in first-episode psychosis. Psychiatry Res. 2018;268:361–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kukla M, Bell MD, Lysaker PH. A randomized controlled trial examining a cognitive behavioral therapy intervention enhanced with cognitive remediation to improve work and neurocognition outcomes among persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophr Res. 2018;197:400–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Nuechterlein KH, et al. Individual placement and support for individuals with recent-onset schizophrenia: integrating supported education and supported employment. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2008;31(4):340–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mueser KT, et al. The effectiveness of skills training for improving outcomes in supported employment. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56(10):1254–1260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dorio J, Marine S. Tying it all together—the PASS to success: a comprehensive look at promoting job retention for workers with psychiatric disabilities in a supported employment program. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004;28(1):32–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Smith MJ, et al. Mechanism of action for obtaining job offers with virtual reality job interview training. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(7):747–750.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Sohn BK, et al. Developing a virtual reality-based vocational rehabilitation training program for patients with schizophrenia. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016;19(11):686–691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Roder V, et al. Improving recreational, residential, and vocational outcomes for patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52(11):1439–1441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Cameron J, et al. Supporting workers with mental health problems to retain employment: users’ experiences of a UK job retention project. Work. 2012;42(4):461–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cella M, Wykes T. The nuts and bolts of Cognitive Remediation: exploring how different training components relate to cognitive and functional gains. Schizophr Res. 2019;203:12–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kukla M, et al. Subjective experiences of the benefits and key elements of a cognitive behavioral intervention focused on community work outcomes in persons with mental illness. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017;205(1):66–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sandoval LR, et al. Effects of peer social interaction on performance during computerized cognitive remediation therapy in patients with early course schizophrenia: a pilot study. Schizophr Res. 2019;203:17–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bond GR, Kukla M. Impact of follow-along support on job tenure in the individual placement and support model. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011;199(3):150–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. McGuire AB, et al. Service intensity as a predictor of competitive employee in an individual placement and support model. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(9):1066–1072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Bryce SD, et al. The impact of intrinsic motivation on session attendance and reliable cognitive improvement in cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2018;202:354–360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Phillips BN, et al. Work-related social skills: definitions and interventions in public vocational rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2014;59(4):386–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. McGurk SR, KiT M. Strategies for coping with cognitive impairments of clients in supported employment. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(10):1421–1429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Koren D, et al. Real-world cognitive–and metacognitive–dysfunction in schizophrenia: a new approach for measuring (and remediating) more “right stuff.” Schizophr Bull. 2006;32(2):310–326.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Matthewson M, Langworthy J, Higgins D. Psychological predictors of vocational success for people with psychotic illness. Aust J Rehabil Couns. 2015;21(1):29–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Williams AE, et al. Work participation for people with severe mental illnesses: an integrative review of factors impacting job tenure. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016;63(2):65–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Nygren U, et al. Predictors of vocational outcomes using individual placement and support for people with mental illness. Work. 2013;45(1):31–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Corbière M, Charette-Dussault É, Villotti P. Predictors of job acquisition and job tenure for people with severe mental disorders. In: Siegrist J, Bültmann U, editors. Handbook of disability, work and health. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Corbière M, et al. Disclosure of a mental disorder in the workplace and work accommodations: two factors associated with job tenure of people with severe mental disorders. Encephale. 2014;40(Suppl 2):S91–S102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Graham JR, Jones ME, Shier M. Tipping points: What participants found valuable in labour market training programmes for vulnerable groups. Int J Soc Welf. 2010;19(1):63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Kukla M, Davis LW, Lysaker PH. Cognitive behavioral therapy and work outcomes: correlates of treatment engagement and full and partial success in schizophrenia. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2014;42(5):577–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Pachoud B, et al. How to improve practices and interventions for work integration of people with schizophrenia in France? Encephale. 2015;41(6):507–514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Fortin G, Lecomte T, Corbiere M. Does personality influence job acquisition and tenure in people with severe mental illness enrolled in supported employment programs? J Ment Health. 2017;26(3):248–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Cunningham K, Wolbert R, Brockmeier MB. Moving beyond the illness: factors contributing to gaining and maintaining employment. Am J Community Psychol. 2000;28(4):481–494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Lord SE, et al. The potential of technology for enhancing individual placement and support supported employment. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014;37(2):99–106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Bégin É, Corbière M. Les compétences perçues de la personne ayant un trouble mental grave: un facteur significatif de maintien en emploi. Can J Commun Ment Health. 2012;31(2):35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Saperstein A, Fiszdon J, Bell M. Intrinsic motivation as a predictor of work outcome after vocational rehabilitation in schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011;199:672–677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Kirsh B. Client, contextual and program elements influencing supported employment: a literature review. Community Ment Health J. 2016;52(7):809–820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Evans JD, et al. Cognitive and clinical predictors of success in vocational rehabilitation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2004;70(2–3):331–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Sumiyoshi C, et al. Predicting work outcome in patients with schizophrenia: Influence of IQ decline. Schizophr Res. 2018;201:172–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Allott KA, et al. The relative contribution of neurocognition and social cognition to 6-month vocational outcomes following individual placement and support in first-episode psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2013;150(1):136–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Caruana E, et al. The relationship between cognition, job complexity, and employment duration in first-episode psychosis. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015;38(3):210–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Dickerson FB, et al. The association between cognitive functioning and occupational status in persons with a recent onset of psychosis. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007;195(7):566–571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Franck N. Cognitive remediation and work outcome in schizophrenia. Encephale. 2014;40(Suppl 2):S75–S80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. McGurk SR, Mueser KT. Cognitive and clinical predictors of work outcomes in clients with schizophrenia receiving supported employment services: 4-year follow-up. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006;33(5):598–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Jabben N, et al. Is processing speed predictive of functional outcome in psychosis? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2008;43(6):437–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Lexen A, et al. Cognitive functioning and employment among people with schizophrenia in vocational rehabilitation. Work. 2016;54(3):735–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Tsang HW, et al. Review on vocational predictors: A systematic review of predictors of vocational outcomes among individuals with schizophrenia: an update since 1998. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010;44(6):495–504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Gold JM, et al. Cognitive correlates of job tenure among patients with severe mental illness. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(8):1395–1402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Corbière M, et al. Work accommodations and natural supports for maintaining employment. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014;37(2):90–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Corbière M. Work integration of people with schizophrenia and other severe mental disorders. Revue Quebecoise de Psychologie. 2008;29(1):95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Johannesen JK, et al. Change in self-perceived barriers to employment as a predictor of vocational rehabilitation outcome. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2009;12(4):295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Tsang HW, et al. A cross-cultural study of employers’ concerns about hiring people with psychotic disorder: implications for recovery. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42(9):723–733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Chorpita BF, Daleiden EL, Weisz JR. Modularity in the design and application of therapeutic interventions. Appl Prev Psychol. 2005;11:141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Dunn G, et al. Effective elements of cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis: results of a novel type of subgroup analysis based on principal stratification. Psychol Med. 2012;42(5):1057–1068.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Forbat L, Black L, Dulgar K. What clinicians think of manualized psychotherapy interventions: findings from a systematic review. J Fam Ther. 2015;37:409–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Emmelkamp PM, et al. Advancing psychotherapy and evidence-based psychological interventions. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014;23(Suppl 1):58–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Kabat-Zinn J. Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York: Bantam Books; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  102. Medalia A, Bowie C. Cognitive remediation to improve functional outcomes. New York: Oxford Press University; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  103. Moritz S, Woodward TS. Metacognitive training in schizophrenia: from basic research to knowledge translation and intervention. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007;20(6):619–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Boisvert J-M, Beaudry M. S'affirmer et communiquer. Montréal: Les Éditions de l'Homme; 2012.

  105. Gross JJ. Handbook of emotion regulation. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford publications; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Roberts D, Penn D, Combs DR. Social cognition and interaction training (SCIT): group psychotherapy for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Clinican guide. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Bowie CR, et al. Action-based cognitive remediation for individuals with serious mental illnesses: effects of real-world simulations and goal setting on functional and vocational outcomes. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2017;40(1):53–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Twamley EW, et al. Compensatory cognitive training for psychosis: effects in a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(9):1212–1219.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Moritz S, Woodward TS, Balzan R. Is metacognitive training for psychosis effective? Expert Rev Neurother. 2016;16(2):105–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Linehan M. DBT skills training manual. New York: The Guilford Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Davis LW, et al. Effect of mindfulness on vocational rehabilitation outcomes in stable phase schizophrenia. Psychol Serv. 2015;12(3):303–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Segal ZV, Williams JMG, Teasdale JD. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Lecomte T, Corbière M, Lysaker PH. A group cognitive behavioral intervention for people registered in supported employment programs: CBT-SE. Encephale. 2014;40(Suppl 2):S81–S90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Mervis JE, et al. Effects of the Indianapolis Vocational Intervention Program (IVIP) on defeatist beliefs, work motivation, and work outcomes in serious mental illness. Schizophr Res. 2017;182:129–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Corbière M, Charette-Dussault É, Villotti P. Factors of competitive employment for people with severe mental illness, from acquisition to tenure. In: Bültmann U, Siegrist J, editors. Handbook of disability, work, and health. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 525–550.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  116. Pachoud B, et al. How to improve practices and interventions for work integration of people with schizophrenia in France? Encéphale. 2015;41(6):507–514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Johannesen JK, et al. Change in self-perceived barriers to employment as a predictor of vocational rehabilitation outcome. Am J Psychiatric Rehabil. 2009;12(4):295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Bleijenberg N, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste by optimizing the development of complex interventions: enriching the development phase of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;79:86–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Bartholomew L, et al. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Subirana M, et al. A realist logic model of the links between nurse staffing and the outcomes of nursing. J Res Nurs. 2014;19(1):8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Hagler M, et al. Working for well-being: uncovering the protective benefits of work through mixed methods analysis. J Happiness Stud. 2016;17:1493–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Gibbons BJ, Salkever DS. Working with a severe mental illness: estimating the causal effects of employment on mental health status and total mental health costs. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019;46(4):474–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Bio DS, Gattaz WF. Vocational rehabilitation improves cognition and negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2011;126(1–3):265–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Martin B. Benefits of work for people with psychosis. Perspect Psy. 2018;57(2):115–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Ogden L. “To fill the emptiness”: the importance of work in life history narratives of older adults with schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses. Qual Soc Work. 2018;17(4):556–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Davidson L. Recovering a sense of self in schizophrenia. J Pers. 2020;88(1):122–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Bejerholm U, Eklund M. Occupational engagement in persons with schizophrenia: relationships to self-related variables, psychopathology, and quality of life. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61(1):21–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Dewa CS, et al. A comparison of healthcare use and costs for workers with psychiatric disabilities employed in social enterprises versus those who are not employed and seeking work. Community Ment Health J. 2019;55(2):202–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Czajkowski SM, et al. From ideas to efficacy: the ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases. Health Psychol. 2015;34(10):971–982.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. McGorry P, et al. Clinical staging: a heuristic and practical strategy for new research and better health and social outcomes for psychotic and related mood disorders. Can J Psychiatry. 2010;55(8):486–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Bond GR, Drake RE, Campbell K. Effectiveness of individual placement and support supported employment for young adults. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2016;10(4):300–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Karyne Anselmo, MSc, for her assistance in data analysis.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Université du Québec À Montréal, 100 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, QC, H2X 3P2, Canada

    Geneviève Sauvé

  2. Douglas Mental Health University Institute, 6875 LaSalle Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4H 1R3, Canada

    Gabriella Buck & Martin Lepage

  3. Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, 1033 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1, Canada

    Martin Lepage

  4. Centre de Recherche de L’Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, 7331 Hochelaga, Montreal, QC, H1N 3V2, Canada

    Marc Corbière

  5. Department of Education – Career Counselling, Université du Québec À Montréal, Pavilion N, 1205 Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2X 3R9, Canada

    Marc Corbière

Authors
  1. Geneviève Sauvé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabriella Buck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Lepage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marc Corbière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Authors GS, ML and MC contributed to the study conception and design. Authors GS and GB performed the literature search and data analysis. Author GS drafted the manuscript and all authors critically revised, read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Corbière.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors GS, GB and MC declare no conflicts of interest. Author ML reports grants from Otsuka Lundbeck Alliance, personal fees from Otsuka Canada, personal fees from Lundbeck Canada, grants and personal fees from Janssen, and personal fees from MedAvante-Prophase, all outside the submitted work. Salary awards include: Doctoral scholarships from the Université du Québec À Montréal for author GS; James McGill Professorship from McGill University and Research Chair from the FRQS for author ML.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sauvé, G., Buck, G., Lepage, M. et al. Minds@Work: A New Manualized Intervention to Improve Job Tenure in Psychosis Based on Scoping Review and Logic Model. J Occup Rehabil 32, 515–528 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09995-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09995-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation