Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evidence for the Cost-Effectiveness of Return-to-Work Interventions for Mental Illness Related Sickness Absences: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this systematic literature review (SLR) is to examine the state of knowledge about the cost-effectiveness of return-to-work (RTW) interventions targeted at workers with medically certified sickness absences related to mental disorders. Our SLR addresses the question, “What is the evidence for the cost-effectiveness of RTW interventions for mental illness related sickness absences?” Methods This SLR used a reviewer pair multi-phase screening of publically available peer-reviewed studies published between 2002 and 2019. Five electronic databases were searched: (1) MEDLINE 1946–Present, (2) MEDLINE: Epub–Ahead of Print and In-Process, (3) PsycINFO, (4) Econlit, and (5) Web of Science. Results 6138 unique citations were identified. Ten articles were included in the review. Eight of the ten studies were conducted in the Netherlands, one in Sweden, and one in Canada. Results of this SLR suggest there is evidence that RTW interventions for workers with medically certified sickness absences can be cost-effective. Conclusions Although this SLR’s results suggest that economic evaluations of RTW interventions can be cost-effective, the use of economic evaluations for studies of these program types is in its infancy. Some jurisdictions (e.g., the Netherlands) seem to have recognized the need for economic evaluations. However, more research is needed in different disability system contexts. Furthermore, use of the standard economic evaluation approaches for healthcare interventions may limit the usefulness of results if the end-user is an employer or non-health organization. This may present the opportunity to introduce newer approaches that include work-related measures of effectiveness and analytical approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenberg PE, Fournier AA, Sisitsky T, Pike CT, Kessler RC. The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010). J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76(2):155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Wittchen HU, Jonsson B, group Cs, et al. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(1):155–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stephens T, Joubert N. The economic burden of mental health problems in Canada. Chronic Dis Can. 2001;22(1):18–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dewa CS, Loong D, Bonato S, Hees H. Incidence rates of sickness absence related to mental disorders: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dewa CS, Loong D, Bonato S. Work outcomes of sickness absence related to mental disorders: a systematic literature review. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):e005533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel D, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Transforming disability into ability: policies to promote work and income security for disabled people. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. BMJ. 2013;346:f1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brouwers EP, de Bruijne MC, Terluin B, Tiemens BG, Verhaak PF. Cost-effectiveness of an activating intervention by social workers for patients with minor mental disorders on sick leave: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17(2):214–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arends I, Bultmann U, van Rhenen W, Groen H, van der Klink JJ. Economic evaluation of a problem solving intervention to prevent recurrent sickness absence in workers with common mental disorders. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e71937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dewa CS, Hoch JS, Carmen G, Guscott R, Anderson C. Cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of a collaborative mental health care program for people receiving short-term disability benefits for psychiatric disorders. Can J Psychiatry. 2009;54(6):379–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rebergen DS, Bruinvels DJ, van Tulder MW, van der Beek AJ, van Mechelen W. Cost-effectiveness of guideline-based care for workers with mental health problems. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51(3):313–322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goorden M, Vlasveld MC, Anema JR, van Mechelen W, Beekman AT, Hoedeman R, et al. Cost-utility analysis of a collaborative care intervention for major depressive disorder in an occupational healthcare setting. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(3):555–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lammerts L, van Dongen JM, Schaafsma FG, van Mechelen W, Anema JR. A participatory supportive return to work program for workers without an employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schene AH, Koeter MW, Kikkert MJ, Swinkels JA, McCrone P. Adjuvant occupational therapy for work-related major depression works: randomized trial including economic evaluation. Psychol Med. 2007;37(3):351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van Oostrom SH, Heymans MW, de Vet HCW, Tulder MW, van Mechelen W, Johannes R, Anema JR. Economic evaluation of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with distress. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(9):603–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Uegaki K, Bakker I, de Bruijne M, van der Beek A, Terluin B, van Marwijk H, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a minimal intervention for stress-related sick leave in general practice: results of an economic evaluation alongside a pragmatic randomised control trial. J Affect Disord. 2010;120(1–3):177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Finnes A, Enebrink P, Sampaio F, Sorjonen K, Dahl J, Ghaderi A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy and a workplace intervention for employees on sickness absence due to mental disorders. J Occup Environ Med. 2017;59(12):1211–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rabin R, de Charro F, Szende A. Comparative review of time trade-off value sets. In: Szende A, Oppe M, Devlin N, editors. EQ-5D value sets inventory, comparative review and user guide. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):903–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stinnett AA, Mullahy J. Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making. 1998;18(2 Suppl):S68–S80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zethraeus N, Johannesson M, Jonsson B, Lothgren M, Tambour M. Advantages of using the net-benefit approach for analysing uncertainty in economic evaluation studies. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(1):39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tambour M, Zethraeus N, Johannesson M. A note on confidence intervals in cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998;14(3):467–471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoch JS, Briggs AH, Willan AR. Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue: a framework for the marriage of health econometrics and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ. 2002;11(5):415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fultz E. Disability insurance in the Netherlands: a blueprint for U.S. reform?. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dewa CS, Hoch JS. Implementing an economic evaluation of a workplace mental health intervention: a primer. In: Riba MB, Parikh SV, Greden JF, editors. Mental health in the workplace strategies and tools to optimize outcomes. Basel: Springer; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn S. Dewa.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dewa, C.S., Hoch, J.S., Loong, D. et al. Evidence for the Cost-Effectiveness of Return-to-Work Interventions for Mental Illness Related Sickness Absences: A Systematic Literature Review. J Occup Rehabil 31, 26–40 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09904-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09904-z

Keywords

Navigation