Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 279–288 | Cite as

How Can Supervisors Contribute to the Return to Work of Employees Who have Experienced Depression?

  • Alessia NegriniEmail author
  • Marc Corbière
  • Tania Lecomte
  • Marie-France Coutu
  • Karen Nieuwenhuijsen
  • Louise St-Arnaud
  • Marie-José Durand
  • Andrea Gragnano
  • Djamal Berbiche


Background In Western countries, work disability due to depression is a widespread problem that generates enormous costs. Objective The goal of this study was to determine the types and prevalence of supervisor contributions during the different phases of the return-to-work (RTW) process (before and during the sick-leave absence, and during the RTW preparations) of employees diagnosed with depression. Moreover, we sought to determine which contributions actually facilitate employees’ RTW, and to identify the work accommodations most frequently implemented by supervisors at the actual time of their employee’s RTW. Methods Telephone interviews were conducted in Québec (Canada) with 74 supervisors working with employees who were already back at work or still on sick leave due to depression. A sub-sample of 46 supervisors who had already taken measures to facilitate their employees’ RTW was questioned about the work accommodations implemented. Results Most of the supervisors got along well with their employees before their sick leave and 72% stayed in contact with them during their leave. Nearly 90% of the supervisors encouraged their employees to focus primarily on their recovery before their RTW, but 43% pressured their employees to RTW as soon as possible. Cox regression analyses performed for the entire sample revealed that “the supervisors’ intention to take measures to facilitate their employees’ RTW” was the only significant predictor of the RTW at the time of the interview. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve showed that 50% of the employees were expected to RTW within the first 8 months of absence. Four of the most frequently implemented work accommodations were actions directly involving the supervisor (i.e. providing assistance, feedback, recognition, and emotional support to the employee). Conclusions This study shed light on the less explored point of view of the supervisor involved in the RTW process of employees post-depression. It highlighted the most frequent and effective supervisor contributions to the process. These results can be used to develop concrete action plans for training supervisors to contribute to the sustainable RTW of employees on sick leave due to depression.


Supervisor Return to work Depression Work accommodation 



We wish to thank all the individuals who participated in the interviews conducted as part of this study.


This work was supported by a funding grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Alessia Negrini, Marc Corbière, Tania Lecomte, Marie-France Coutu, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, Louise St-Arnaud, Marie-José Durand, Andrea Gragnano, and Djamal Berbiche, declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (human research ethics committee).

Human and Animal Rights Statements

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Dewa CS, Lin E, Corbière M, Shain M. Examining the mental health of the working population organizations, individuals, and haystacks. In: Cairney J, Streiner DL, editors. Mental disorder in Canada: an epidemiological perspective. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2010. p. 414–430.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    OECD. Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reesal RT, Lam RW. Clinical guidelines for the treatment of depressive disorders. II. Principles of management. Can J Psychiatry. 2001;46(Suppl 1):21s–28s.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lim KL, Jacobs P, Ohinmaa A, Schopflocher D, Dewa CS. A new population-based measure of the economic burden of mental illness in Canada. Chronic Dis Can. 2008;28(3):92–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lebeau M, Duguay P, Boucher A. The costs of occupational injuries in Québec, 2005–2007. Montreal: Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST); 2014. Report No.: R-843.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corbière M, Negrini A, Dewa CS. Mental health problems and mental disorders: linked determinants to work participation and work functionning. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of work disability: prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek J, Siemerink JC, Tummers-Nijsen D. Quality of rehabilitation among workers with adjustment disorders according to practice guidelines; a retrospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(suppl 1):i21–i25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shiels C, Gabbay MB, Ford FM. Patient factors associated with duration of certified sickness absence and transition to long-term incapacity. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54(499):86–91.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van der Klink JJL, Blonk RWB, Schene AH, van Dijk FJH. Reducing long term sickness absence by an activating intervention in adjustment disorders: a cluster randomised controlled design. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(6):429–437.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mood Disorders Society of Canada. Quick facts: mental illness & addiction in Canada. 3rd ed. Guelph: Mood Disorders Society of Canada; 2009.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, Vézina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, et al. Disability prevention: the new paradigm of management of occupational back pain. Dis Manag Health Out. 2001;9(7):351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Corbière M, Durand MJ, editors. Du trouble mental à l’incapacité au travail: Une perspective transdisciplinaire qui vise à mieux saisir cette problématique et à offrir des pistes d’intervention [From mental disorders to work disability: a transdisciplinary perspective to better understanding this thematic and to offer tools and interventions for actions]. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2011.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loisel P, Anema JR. Handbook of work disability: prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wardle M. Evidence is not enough: the challenges of engaging organisational stakeholders with different perspectives. In: Karanika-Murray M, Biron C, editors. Derailed organizational interventions for stress and well-being: confessions of failure and solutions for success. Dordrecht: Springer; 2015. p. 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JHAM, de Boer AGEM, Blonk RWB, van Dijk FJH. Supervisory behaviour as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(10):817–823.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bolo C, Sareen J, Patten S, Schmitz N, Currie S, Wang J. Receiving workplace mental health accommodations and the outcome of mental disorders in employees with a depressive and/or anxiety disorder. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(11):1293–1299.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Post M, Krol B, Groothoff J. Work-related determinants of return to work of employees on long-term sickness absence. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(9):481–488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D’Amato A, Zijlstra F. Toward a climate for work resumption: the nonmedical determinants of return to work. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52(1):67–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MNM, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–568.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tjulin Å, MacEachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):311–321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Biering K, Hjollund NH, Lund T. Methods in measuring return to work: a comparison of measures of return to work following treatment of coronary heart disease. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(3):400–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Biron M, Bamberger P. Aversive workplace conditions and absenteeism: taking referent group norms and supervisor support into account. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(4):901–912.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Holmgren K, Ivanoff SD. Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):93–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lysaght RM, Larmour-Trode S. An exploration of social support as a factor in the return-to-work process. Work. 2008;30(3):255–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shaw WS, Robertson MM, Pransky G, McLellan RK. Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):129–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lemieux P, Corbière M, Durand MJ. Retour et réintégration au travail de personnes avec un trouble mental: le rôle du supérieur immmédiat [Return to work and work integration of people with a mental disorder: the role of the immediate supervisor]. In: Corbière M, Durand MJ, editors. Du trouble mental à l’incapacité au travail: Une perspective transdisciplinaire qui vise à mieux saisir cette problématique et à offrir des pistes d’intervention [From mental disorders to work disability: a transdisciplinary perspective to better understanding this thematic and to offer tools and interventions for actions]. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2011. p. 315–338.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thun S, Saksvik PØ, Ose SO, Mehmetoglu M, Christensen M. The impact of supervisors’ attitudes on organizational adjustment norms and attendance pressure norms. Scand J Organ Psychol. 2013;5(2):15–31.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Berthelette D. Les interventions visant à accroître la rétention des salariés seniors: Un bilan des connaissances scientifiques [Interventions to increase the retention of older workers: a review of scientific knowledge]. Archives des Maladies Professionnelles et de l’Environnement. 2010;71(3):351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ng TWH, Feldman DC. The moderating effects of age in the relationships of job autonomy to work outcomes. Work Aging Retire. 2015;1(1):64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    MSSS. L’invalidité pour cause de troubles mentaux chez le personnel du réseau de la santé et des services sociaux [Disability due to mental disorders among health and social service personnel]. Rapport et recommandations du groupe de travail. Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux, Gouvernement du Québec; 2005.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    MacDonald-Wilson KL, Rogers ES, Massaro JM, Lyass A, Crean T. An investigation of reasonable workplace accommodations for people with psychiatric disabilities: quantitative findings from a multi-site study. Community Ment Health J. 2002;38(1):35–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schultz IZ, Rogers ES. Work accommodation and retention in mental health. New York: Springer; 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Corbière M, Villotti P, Lecomte T, Bond GR, Lesage A, Goldner EM. Work accommodations and natural supports for maintaining employment. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014;37(2):90–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Granger B. The role of psychiatric rehabilitation practitioners in assisting people in understanding how to best assert their ADA rights and arrange job accommodations. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2000;23(3):215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Laflamme A-M, Nadeau J. Lois et mesures favorisant l’intégration et le maintien en emploi des personnes souffrant d’un trouble mental. In: Corbière M, Durand MJ, editors. Du trouble mental à l’incapacité au travail: Une perspective transdisciplinaire qui vise à mieux saisir cette problématique et à offrir des pistes d’intervention [From mental disorders to work disability: a transdisciplinary perspective to better understanding this thematic and to offer tools and interventions for actions]. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2011. p. 41–75.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Corbière M, Renard M, St-Arnaud L, Coutu M-F, Negrini A, Sauvé G, et al. Union perceptions of factors related to the return to work of employees with depression. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(2):335–347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Corbière M, Samson E, Negrini A, St-Arnaud L, Durand M-J, Coutu M-F, et al. Factors perceived by employees regarding their sick leave due to depression. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(6):511–519.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Corbière M, St-Arnaud L, Durand M-J, Coutu MF, Lecomte T, Charbonneau C, et al. L’étude des facteurs influençant le retour au travail de personnes ayant eu une dépression - volets employé ayant eu une dépression, supérieur immédiat, employeur [Study of the factors influencing the return to work after depression: the viewpoints of employees, Immediate supervisors, and employers]. 2009. Research protocol.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Corbière M, St-Arnaud L, Durand MJ, Coutu MF, Lecomte T, Negrini A et al. Factors influencing the return to work after depression: the viewpoint and role of unions occupational rehabilitation: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST); 2014. Report No.: R-847.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Trach J, Mayhall C. Analysis of the types of natural supports utilized during job placement and development. J Rehab. 1997;63(2):43–48.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows. Version 22.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.; 2013.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    SAS Institute. SAS® 9.3 statements. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.; 2011.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc B. 1972;34(2):187–220.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gates L, Akabas S. Inclusion of people with mental health disabilities into the workplace: accommodation as a social process. In: Schultz IZ, Rogers ES, editors. Work accommodation and retention in mental health. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    British Health and Safety Executive. Element 2: keeping in contact. In: Managing sickness absence and return to work. British Health and Safety Executive 2004. Accessed 24 Aug 2016.
  47. 47.
    Ekberg K, Wåhlin C, Persson J, Bernfort L, Öberg B. Early and late return to work after sick leave: predictors in a cohort of sick-listed individuals with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(3):627–637.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stochkendahl MJ, Myburgh C, Young AE, Hartvigsen J. Manager experiences with the return to work process in a large, publically funded, hospital setting: walking a fine line. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(4):752–662.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vooijs M, Leensen MC, Hoving JL, Wind H, Frings-Dresen MH. Perspectives of people with a chronic disease on participating in work: a focus group study. J Occup Rehabil. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9694-6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    St-Arnaud L, Pelletier M. Guide to an integrated practices program for supporting a return to work and promoting job retention. Montreal: Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST); 2014. Report No.: R-813.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Durand M-J, Corbière M, Coutu M-F, Reinharz D, Albert V. A review of best work-absence management and return-to-work practices for workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. Work. 2014;48(4):579–589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Andersen MF, Nielsen KM, Brinkmann S. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38(2):93–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    de Vries G, Hees HL, Koeter MW, Lagerveld SE, Schene AH. Perceived impeding factors for return-to-work after long-term sickness absence due to major depressive disorder: a concept mapping approach. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Roelen CAM, Norder G, Koopmans PC, van Rhenen W, van der Klink JJL, Bültmann U. Employees sick-listed with mental disorders: who returns to work and when? J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(3):409–417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cornelius LR, van der Klink JJ, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S. Prognostic factors of long term disability due to mental disorders: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):259–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Johnston V, Way K, Long MH, Wyatt M, Gibson L, Shaw WS. Supervisor competencies for supporting return to work: a mixed-methods study. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):3–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Fabian ES, Waterworth A, Ripke B. Reasonable accommodations for workers with serious mental illness: type, frequency, and associated outcomes. Psychosoc Rehab J. 1993;17(2):163–172.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bacharach SB, Bamberger PA. 9/11 and New York City firefighters’ post hoc unit support and control climates: a context theory of the consequences of involvement in traumatic work-related events. Acad Manage J. 2007;50(4):849–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Stephens C, Long N. Communication with police supervisors and peers as a buffer of work-related traumatic stress. J Organ Behav. 2000;21(4):407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cropanzano R, Rupp DE, Byrne ZS. The relationship of emotional exhaustion to work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(1):160–169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wang J, Patten S, Currie S, Sareen J, Schmitz N. Perceived needs for and use of workplace accommodations by individuals with a depressive and/or anxiety disorder. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(11):1268–1272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol. 2008;57(1):1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pomaki G, France RL, Khushrushani N, Murray E, Lampinen T, Mah P. Best practices for return-to-work/stay-at-work interventions for workers with mental health conditions: Occupational Health and Safety Agency for Healthcare in BC (OHSAH) 2010.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Schultz IZ, Krupa T, Rogers ES, Winter A. Organizational aspects of work accommodation and retention in mental health. In: Gatchel JR, Schultz ZI, editors. Handbook of occupational health and wellness. Boston: Springer; 2012. p. 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessia Negrini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marc Corbière
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tania Lecomte
    • 4
  • Marie-France Coutu
    • 5
  • Karen Nieuwenhuijsen
    • 6
  • Louise St-Arnaud
    • 7
  • Marie-José Durand
    • 5
  • Andrea Gragnano
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Djamal Berbiche
    • 8
  1. 1.Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST)MontrealCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Educational SciencesUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire en santé mentale de MontréalMontrealCanada
  4. 4.Faculty of Arts and SciencesUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada
  5. 5.Centre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation (CAPRIT), School of RehabilitationUniversité de SherbrookeLongueuilCanada
  6. 6.Coronel Institute of Occupational HealthAcademic Medical CenterAmsterdam-ZuidoostThe Netherlands
  7. 7.Faculty of Education, Centre de recherche et d’intervention sur l’éducation et la vie au travail (CRIEVAT)Université LavalQuebecCanada
  8. 8.Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversité de SherbrookeLongueuilCanada

Personalised recommendations