Skip to main content

Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research on Facilitators and Barriers of Return to Work After Stroke

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation volume 28, pages 28–44 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose Despite existing rehabilitation services, return to work (RTW) rates among stroke survivors are quite low. An increased number of qualitative studies have been conducted to identify facilitators and barriers to RTW after stroke and to derive recommendations for future interventions. The aim of our study was to carry out a meta-synthesis of those studies and thus strengthen evidence in the field. Methods To identify relevant studies (qualitative studies focusing on RTW after stroke, published in English or German between 2000 and 2015), we conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, OVID, and Web of Science. After assessing the quality of eligible studies, we synthesized their findings according to meta-ethnographic methodology. Results Fourteen out of 553 studies—three of very high, seven of high, three of medium, and one of low quality—met the inclusion criteria. After the extraction of all first-order concepts and their translation into 64 second-order interpretations, we synthesized the findings by developing a model of RTW factors after stroke. It contains factors related to the person (impairments, coping/adaptation, significance of work/RTW motivation), workplace (job demands/work adaptations, disability management, work climate/social support), and rehabilitation services (availability, accessibility, appropriateness), as well as relevant factors in the interaction of these three stakeholders (work capacity, performance and capability, and initial RTW experiences). Three basic principles—adaptiveness, purposefulness, and cooperativeness—complete the model and led us to its name: the APC model. Conclusions Successful RTW after stroke depends on diverse factors and stakeholders. Rehabilitation strategies have to consider this; otherwise they become RTW barriers themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. PubMed covers citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. The OVID interface offers access to 100 core and niche databases in the area of life sciences, including for example Embase and PsycINFO. Web of Science finally comprises some journals missed by PubMed and Embase.

References

  1. Krishnamurthi RV, Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA, et al. Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Glob Health (London). 2013;1(5):e259–e281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Larsen LP, Biering K, Johnsen SP, Andersen G, Hjollund NH. Self-rated health and return to work after first-time stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(4):339–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang WH, Sohn MK, Lee J, Kim DY, Lee SG, Shin YI, et al. Return to work after stroke: The KOSCO Study. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(3):273–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maaijwee NA, Rutten-Jacobs LC, Arntz RM, Schaapsmeerders P, Schoonderwaldt HC, van Dijk EJ, et al. Long-term increased risk of unemployment after young stroke: a long-term follow-up study. Neurology. 2014;83(13):1132–1138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang YC, Kapellusch J, Garg A. Important factors influencing the return to work after stroke. Work. 2014;47(4):553–559.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Treger I, Shames J, Giaquinto S, Ring H. Return to work in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(17):1397–1403.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baldwin C, Brusco NK. The effect of vocational rehabilitation on return-to-work rates post stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(5):562–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammed MA, Moles RJ, Chen TF. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research: the challenges and opportunities. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):695–704.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ring N, Jepson R, Ritchie K. Methods of synthesizing qualitative research studies for health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):384–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell R, Pound P, Morgan M, Daker-White G, Britten N, Pill R, et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15(43):1–164.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rice MJ. Evidence-based practice in psychiatric and mental health nursing: qualitative meta-synthesis. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2008;14(5):382–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tomlin G, Borgetto B. Research Pyramid: a new evidence-based practice model for occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(2):189–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. France EF, Ring N, Thomas R, Noyes J, Maxwell M, Jepson R. A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Stergiou-Kita M, Grigorovich A, Tseung V, Milosevic E, Herbert D, Phan S, et al. Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors’ work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(4):657–670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Andersen MF, Nielsen KM, Brinkmann S. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38(2):93–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Banning M. Employment and breast cancer: a meta-ethnography. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011;20(6):708–719.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fossey E, Harvey C. Finding and sustaining employment: a qualitative meta-synthesis of mental health consumer views. Can J Occup Ther. 2010;77(5):303–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wells M, Williams B, Firnigl D, Lang H, Coyle J, Kroll T, et al. Supporting ‘work-related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’ after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(6):1208–1219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). CASP Qualitative Research Checklist. 2014. http://media.wix.com/ugd/dded87_29c5b002d99342f788c6ac670e49f274. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.

  21. Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(4):365–371.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. London: Sage; 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meier P. Mind-mapping: a tool for eliciting and representing knowledge held by diverse informants. Soc Res Update. 2007;52:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jackson K, Trochim W. Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organ Res Meth. 2002;5(4):307–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Corr S, Wilmer S. Returning to work after a stroke: an important but neglected area. Br J Occup Ther. 2003;66(5):186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lock S, Jordan L, Bryan K, Maxim J. Work after stroke: focusing on barriers and enablers. Disabil Soc. 2005;20(1):33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Koch L, Egbert N, Coeling H, Ayers D. Returning to work after the onset of illness: Experiences of right hemisphere stroke survivors. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2005;48(4):209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Medin J, Barajas J, Ekberg K. Stroke patients’ experiences of return to work. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(17):1051–1060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, Penhale B. Working after a stroke: Survivors’ experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(24):1858–1869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gilworth G, Phil M, Cert A, Sansam KA, Kent RM. Personal experiences of returning to work following stroke: an exploratory study. Work. 2009;34(1):95–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Culler KH, Wang YC, Byers K, Trierweiler R. Barriers and facilitators of return to work for individuals with strokes: perspectives of the stroke survivor, vocational specialist, and employer. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):325–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hartke RJ, Trierweiler R, Bode R. Critical factors related to return to work after stroke: a qualitative study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):341–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Morris J, Franklin S, Menger F GD. Returning to work with aphasia: a case study. Aphasiology. 2011;25(8):890–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wolfenden B, Grace M. Identity continuity in the face of biographical disruption: ‘It’s the same me’. Brain Impair. 2012;13(2):203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gustafsson L, Turpin M. Analysis of one stroke survivor’s transition into vocational experiences. Brain Impair. 2012;13(1):99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Coole C, Radford K, Grant M, Terry J. Returning to work after stroke: perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(3):406–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vestling M, Ramel E, Iwarsson S. Thoughts and experiences from returning to work after stroke. Work. 2013;45(2):201–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sinclair E, Radford K, Grant M, Terry J. Developing stroke-specific vocational rehabilitation: a soft systems analysis of current service provision. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(5):409–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shaw WS, van der Windt DA, Main CJ, Loisel P, Linton SJ. Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors (“Blue Flags”) in back disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):64–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC, Bruns GL, Stoler MR, Nassif T, et al. Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(4):415–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mehnert A, de Boer A, Feuerstein M. Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer. 2013;119(S11):2151–2159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schultz I, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):327–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. de Boer AG, Taskila TK, Tamminga SJ, Feuerstein M, Frings-Dresen MH, Verbeek JH. Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;25(9):CD007569.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Faber B, Verbeek JH, Neumeyer-Gromen A, Hees HL, Verhoeven AC, et al. Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3(12):CD006237.

    Google Scholar 

  47. van Vilsteren M, van Oostrom SH, de Vet HC, Franche RL, Boot CR, Anema JR. Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;5(10):CD006955.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was funded partially by the non-profit foundation Schmieder for Sciences and Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rehabilitation, German Federal Pension Insurance, Hohenzollerndamm 47, 10704, Berlin, Germany

    Marco Streibelt

  2. Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany

    Betje Schwarz

  3. Schmieder Clinic, Eichhornstraße 68, 78464, Konstanz, Germany

    Dolores Claros-Salinas

Authors
  1. Betje Schwarz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dolores Claros-Salinas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Streibelt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Streibelt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwarz, B., Claros-Salinas, D. & Streibelt, M. Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research on Facilitators and Barriers of Return to Work After Stroke. J Occup Rehabil 28, 28–44 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9713-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9713-2

Keywords

  • Review
  • Meta-synthesis
  • Meta-ethnography
  • Return to work (RTW)
  • Stroke