Vocational Rehabilitation of Transition-Age Youth with Disabilities: A Propensity-Score Matched Study
- 781 Downloads
Objective To investigate the employment outcomes of vocational rehabilitation (VR) services for youth with disabilities in a targeted, enhanced, and contract-based secondary transition program as compared to the traditional VR transition services. Methods A population-based study was conducted on 4422 youth with physical, intellectual, learning, mental and hearing disabilities aged 14–21 at application and whose case was closed after receiving VR transition services in a Midwestern state. Selected youth were classified into either targeted secondary transition program (START) or non-START treatment group. The employment outcomes of the groups were compared using propensity-score matching procedures. Results 2211 youth with disabilities in each treatment group were successfully matched based on demographic characteristics, types of disabilities, existence of severe functional limitations, and year of referral. The overall rehabilitation rate was 57 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 56–59 %], where the START group rate was 61 % (95 % CI 59–63 %) and the non-START group 53 % (95 % CI 51–55 %). The propensity-score matched odds ratio (OR) was 1.40 (95 % CI 1.24–1.58; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that the odds of rehabilitation in youth with disabilities were consistently higher when they were in START as compared to non-START (OR ranged from 1.27 to 1.92 with p < 0.05 except for the Hispanic subgroup). Conclusion The results suggest that VR services in a targeted, enhanced, and contract-based secondary transition program are more effective in transitioning youth with disabilities to employment than the regular VR transition services.
KeywordsYouth with disabilities Vocational rehabilitation Transition services Propensity score analysis
This research was supported in part by funding from the Illinois Division of Rehabilitation Services (IDRS) contract #46CSD00459. The authors are grateful to Patricia Kratochwill and George E. Manning II for technical assistance, and to the reviewers for constructive comments and advices.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 9.Hammarström A. Health consequences of youth unemployment: review from a gender perspective. Soc Sci Med. 1982;1994(38):699–709.Google Scholar
- 10.Hultman B, Hemlin S. Self-rated quality of life among the young unemployed and the young in work in northern Sweden. Work Read Mass. 2008;30:461–72.Google Scholar
- 13.Newman L, Wagner M, Cameto R, Knokey AM. The post-high school outcomes of youths with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: a report from the National Longitudinal Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2009-3017). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International; 2009. http://www.ies.ed.gov/ncser/pdf/20093017.pdf.
- 14.U.S. Department of Labor Office of Disability Employment Policy. Youth employment rate [Internet]; 2015. http://www.dol.gov/odep/categories/youth/youthemployment.html.
- 15.U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics. Person with a disability: labor force characteristics—2014 [Internet]. U.S. Department of Labor; 2015. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/disabl.pdf.
- 16.Frey WD. Transition in education and employment. In: Albrecht GL, editor. Encyclopedia of disability, vol IV. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication; 2006. p. 1557–9.Google Scholar
- 17.93th United States Congress. Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The Congress of the United States of America; 1973.Google Scholar
- 18.94th United States Congress. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. The Congress of the United States of America; 1975.Google Scholar
- 19.101st United States Congress. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990. The Congress of the United States of America; 1990.Google Scholar
- 20.National Council on Disability. The Rehabilitation Act: outcomes for transition-age youth. Washington: National Council on Disability; 2008.Google Scholar
- 21.U.S. Department of Education Rehabilitation Services Administration. Reporting manual for the case service report (RSA 911): state–federal program for vocational rehabilitation [Internet]. U.S. Department of Education Rehabilitation Services Administration; 2011. http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/rsa/.
- 22.U.S. Department of Education Rehabilitation Services Administration. Emerging practices [Internet]. U.S. Department of Education Rehabilitation Services Administration; 2015. https://rsa.ed.gov/emerging-practices.cfm.
- 24.Test DW, Cease-Cook J. Evidence-based secondary transition practices for rehabilitation counselors. J Rehabil. 2012;78:30.Google Scholar
- 28.Mazzotti VL, Plotner AJ. Implementing secondary transition evidence-based practices a multi-state survey of transition service providers. Career Dev Transit Except Individ. 2014;2165143414544360:1–11.Google Scholar
- 29.Pruett SR, Swett EA, Chan F, Rosenthal DA, Lee GK. Empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation. J Rehabil. 2008;74:56–63.Google Scholar
- 34.Haber MG, Mazzotti VL, Mustian AL, Rowe DA, Bartholomew AL, Test DW, et al. What works, when, for whom, and with whom a meta-analytic review of predictors of postsecondary success for students with disabilities. Rev Educ Res. 2015. doi: 10.3102/0034654315583135.
- 36.U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services. 36th annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2014 [Internet]. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 2014. http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2014/parts-b-c/36th-idea-arc.pdf.
- 42.National Council on Disability Social Security Administration. Transition and post-school outcomes for youth with disabilities: closing the gaps to post-secondary education and employment. Washington: National Council on Disability; 2000.Google Scholar
- 43.Newman L, Wagner M, Cameto R, Knokey AM, Shaver D. Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: a report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2010-3008). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International; 2010. http://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=NCSER20103008.
- 45.Cameto R, Levine P, Wagner M. Transition planning for students with disabilities: a special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (ED); 2004. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED496547.
- 48.Stampf S. Propensity score based data analysis [Internet]; 2014. http://www.cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nonrandom/vignettes/nonrandom.pdf.