Bridging Health Care and the Workplace: Formulation of a Return-to-Work Intervention for Breast Cancer Patients Using an Intervention Mapping Approach
- 738 Downloads
Purpose An increasing number of breast cancer (BC) survivors of working age require return to work (RTW) support. Objective of this paper is to describe the development of a RTW intervention to be embedded in the care process bridging the gap between hospital and workplace. Method The Intervention Mapping (IM) approach was used and combined formative research results regarding RTW in BC patients with published insights on occupational therapy (OT) and RTW. Four development steps were taken, starting from needs assessment to the development of intervention components and materials. Results A five-phased RTW intervention guided by a hospital-based occupational therapist is proposed: (1) assessing the worker, the usual work and contextual factors which impacts on (re-)employment; (2) exploration of match/differences between the worker and the usual work; (3) establishing long term goals, broken down into short term goals; (4) setting up tailored actions by carefully implementing results of preceding phases; (5) step by step, the program as described in phase 4 will be executed. The occupational therapist monitors, measures and reviews goals and program-steps in the intervention to secure the tailor-made approach of each program-step of the intervention. Conclusion The use of IM resulted in a RTW oriented OT intervention. This unique intervention succeeds in matching individual BC patient needs, the input of stakeholders at the hospital and the workplace.
KeywordsBreast cancer Occupational therapy Return to work Intervention Mapping Vocational rehabilitation
The authors wish to thank “Kom Op Tegen Kanker” for funding this research. We are also very grateful for the support of the CANWON project.
A.D.R., R.C. and H.D. participated intensively in the discussion sessions that are mentioned in the method section of this paper. L.G. and E.V.H. questioned the outcomes of the discussions; the choices made in the development process and, like A.D.R. and R.C., both were involved in editing the text that was written by H.D.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
No competing interests.
For the development of the intervention, no personal data of participants or patients were collected. The article is based on the literature. Consequently, no approval was required from an ethical committee.
- 5.Désiron HAM, Knippenberg E, Willems B, Neerinckx E. Occupational therapy for breast cancer survivors: improving quality of life by return-to-work assistance. J Rehabil Med. 2008;135–6.Google Scholar
- 9.Désiron HAM, Biesmans K, Reyskens A. Occupational therapy approach in oncological rehabilitation (Ergotherapeutische Methodiek in Oncologische Revalidatie / EMIOR). 2012. Report No.: ESF Project Nr 2144. http://esf-agentschap.be/nl/projectenkaart/emior-ii.
- 17.World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). 2001. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.
- 19.Désiron H. Occupational therapy and return to work for breast cancer survivors. WFOT Bull. 2010;61:45–51.Google Scholar
- 24.Tiedtke C. Return to work experiences after breast cancer. Leuven: Leuven University Group Biomedical Sciences; Faculty of Medicine—Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Occupational, Environmental and Insurance Medicine; 2013.Google Scholar
- 29.Vermeulen SJ, Anema JR, Schellart AJ, van Mechelen W, van der Beek AJ. Intervention mapping for development of a participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:216.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 30.Vonk Noordegraaf A, Huirne JAF, Pittens C, van Mechelen W, Broerse JEW, Brölmann HAM, et al. eHealth program to empower patients in returning to normal activities and work after gynecologival surgery: intervention mapping as a useful method for development. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 31.Rick O, Kalusche EM, Dauelsberg T, König V, Korsukéwitz C, Seifart U. Reintegrating cancer patients into the workplace. Deutsches Arzteblad International. 2012;109(42):702–8.Google Scholar
- 33.World Federation of Occupational Therapists. Aims of Occupational Therapy. http://www.wfot.org. 2011 [cited 2014 Oct 5]; (World Federation of Occupational Therapists). http://www.wfot.org/Portals/0/PDF/STATEMENT%20ON%20OCCUPATIONAL%20THERAPY%20300811.pdf.
- 35.Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok GJ, Gottlieb NH. Intervention Mapping: designing theory and evidence-based health promotion programs. 1st ed. Mountain View, California: Mayfield Publishing Company; 2001.Google Scholar
- 36.Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006.Google Scholar
- 39.Homl M, Rogers JC, Stone RG. Overview of intervention section II: person-task-environment interventions: a decision-making guide. In: Schell BA, Crepeau EB, Schell BAB, editors. Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.Google Scholar
- 42.Crompton S. Occupational therapy intervention in cancer. Guidance for professionals, managers and decision-makers. London: College of Occupational Therapists, HOPE: the Specialist Section of Occupational Therapists in HIV/AIDS, Oncology, Palliative Care and Education; 2004.Google Scholar
- 43.Rice VJ. Restoring competence for the worker role. In: Radomski MV, Latham CAT, editors. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 871–908.Google Scholar
- 44.Shaw L. Are you listening? External challenges in work rehabilitation practice: enabling return to work through a client-centred approach. Occup Ther Now. 2000;2(5):13–5.Google Scholar
- 47.Söderback I, Petterson I, Von Essen L, Stein F. Cancerpatients’ and their physicians’ perceptions of the formers’ need for occupational therapy. Scand J Occup Ther. 2000;24(7):77–86.Google Scholar
- 49.Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Lehto US, Hakanen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors’ received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer. 2005.Google Scholar
- 52.Pauwels E, Van Hoof E, Charlier C, Lechner L, Bourdeaudhuij I. Transition into survivorship. A qualitative study of breast cancer survivors’ and intimate partners’ experiences of the post-treatment phase and preferences regarding on-line support. Ghent: Social Health Sciences, Ghent University & Psychological Sciences, Free University of Brussels; 2012.Google Scholar
- 55.Tamminga SJ. Enhancing return to work of cancer patients. Amsterdam: Faculty of Medicine of the University of Amsterdam (UvA); 2012.Google Scholar
- 56.de Boer AGM, Taskila T, Tamminga S, Frings-Dresen M, Feuerstein M, Verbeek J. Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. [The Cochrane Library]. 2009. The Cochrane, Library 2009, Issue 1, The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd. 4-2-2011.Google Scholar
- 70.Wright M. Early return to work & occupational therapy. OT Pract. 1997;2(5):36–42.Google Scholar
- 74.Curtin M. Enabling skills and strategies. In: Curtin M, Molineux M, Supyk-Mellson J, editors. Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction/enabling occupation. 6th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010. p. 111–20.Google Scholar
- 75.Cook C, Lukersmith S. Work rehabilitation. In: Curtin M, Molineux M, Supyk-Mellson J, editors. Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction enabling occupation. 6th ed. Edingburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010. p. 391–408.Google Scholar
- 76.Rogers JC. Occupational reasoning. In: Curtin M, Molineux M, Supyk-Mellson J, editors. Occupational therapy and physical disfunction/enabling occupation. 6th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010. p. 57–65.Google Scholar
- 79.Kielhofner G. Research in occupational therapy: methods of inquiry for enhancing practice. Chicago: F.A.Davis Company; 2006.Google Scholar
- 80.Cohn ES, Coster W. Unpacking our theoretical reasoning. In: Schell BAB, Gillen G, Scaffa ME, Cohn ES, editors. Willard and Spackan’s occupational therapy, unit IX occupational performance theories of practice. 12th ed. Wolters KLuwer/Lippincott/William & Wilkins: Philadeplhia; 2014. p. 477–93.Google Scholar
- 81.Duncan EAS. Shared decision-making skilss in practice. In: Duncan EAS, editor. Skills for practice in occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevie; 2009. p. 41–54.Google Scholar
- 83.Duncan EAS. Developing research in practice. In: Duncan EAS, editor. Skills for practice in occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2009. p. 267–78.Google Scholar
- 84.Carpenter C, Suto M. Qualitative research for occupational and physical therapists; a practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2008.Google Scholar
- 85.Dixey R. Health promotion and occupational therapy. In: Curtin M, Molineux M, Supyk-Mellson J, editors. Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction/enabling occupation. 6th ed. Edinburgh: Chruchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010. p. 239–52.Google Scholar