Advertisement

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 617–617 | Cite as

Erratum to: Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Rule of the Return-to-Work Status of Injured Employees in Minnesota

  • A. Bentley HankinsEmail author
  • Christine A. Reid
Erratum

Erratum to: J Occup Rehabil DOI 10.1007/s10926-015-9568-3

Unfortunately, the return-to-work (RTW) rates for the binary variable attorney involvement in Table 1 are mistakenly transposed in the original publication of the article.

The correct RTW rates are 41.8 % for injured employees with an attorney involved and 86.8 % for injured employees with no attorney involved in their workers’ compensation claim. The corrected portion of Table 1 is given below:

Variable

n

%

RTW %

Attorney involvement

 Attorney involved

8,376

54.5

41.8

 No attorney involved

6,996

45.5

86.8

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hankins and Hankins Vocational ConsultingJonesboroughUSA
  2. 2.Department of Rehabilitation Counseling, School of Allied Health ProfessionsVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations