Skip to main content

Workplace Accommodations for People with Mental Illness: A Scoping Review

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation volume 25, pages 197–206 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose Disability discrimination legislation means that employees with a disability or mental illness are legally entitled to reasonable workplace accommodations that enable them to work effectively and safely. This scoping review aims to investigate the types of workplace accommodations provided for people with mental illness, and their costs and benefits. Methods A literature search was conducted using five electronic databases. Peer reviewed research articles published between 1993 and June 2013 were included in this scoping review and their quality was assessed. Opinion papers, reports, and case descriptions were excluded. Results Nine studies explored workplace accommodations for people with mental illness. The most commonly reported work-related accommodations were flexible scheduling/reduced hours, modified training and supervision, and modified job duties/descriptions. The least common type of accommodation was physical modification to the workplace. For employees with persistent mental illness who were accessing a supported employment agency, the majority of accommodations related to support from the job coach or employment specialist, such as facilitating communication with the employer during hiring or on the job. The quality of the studies varied considerably and the benefits of the accommodations are not yet well documented. There is limited evidence that a larger number of workplace accommodations are associated with longer job tenure. Conclusions Workplace accommodations appear to be important to support employees with mental illness, but more accessible information about how disability discrimination legislation applies to this population is needed. Future research should address the implementation and effectiveness of mental health-related workplace accommodations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Corbière M, Zaniboni S, Lecomte T, Bond G, Gilles PY, Lesage A, et al. Job acquisition for people with severe mental illness enrolled in supported employment programs: a theoretically grounded empirical study. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(3):342–54. doi:10.1007/s10926-011-9315-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Henry AD, Lucca AM. Contextual factors and participation in employment for people with serious mental illness. OTJR Occup Partic Health. 2002;22:83S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Drake RE, Bond GR, Thornicroft G, Knapp M, Goldman HH. Mental health disability: an international perspective. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2012;23(2):110–20. doi:10.1177/1044207311427403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Waghorn G, Saha S, Harvey C, Morgan VA, Waterreus A, Bush R, et al. ‘Earning and learning’ in those with psychiatric disorders: the second Australian national survey of psychosis. Aust NZ J Psychiatr. 2012;46(8):774–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Secker J, Membrey H. Promoting mental health through employment and developing healthy workplaces: the potential of natural supports at work. Health Educ Res. 2003;18(2):207–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mak DCS, Tsang HWH, Cheung LCC. Job termination among individuals with severe mental illness participating in a supported employment program. Psychiatr Interpers Biol Process. 2006;69(3):239–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Becker DR, Drake RE, Bond GR, Xie H, Dain BJ, Harrison K. Job terminations among persons with severe mental illness participating in supported employment. Community Ment Health J. 1998;34(1):71–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Patten S, Currie S, Sareen J, Schmitz N. Perceived needs for and use of workplace accommodations by individuals with a depressive and/or anxiety disorder. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(11):1268–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MacDonald-Wilson KL, Rogers SE, Massaro JD, Lyass MS, Crean T. An investigation of reasonable workplace accommodations for people with psychiatric disabilities: quantitative findings from a multi-site study. Community Ment Health J. 2002;38(1):35–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Secker J, Membrey H, Grove B, Seebohm P. The how and why of workplace adjustments. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2003;27(1):3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McAlpine DD, Warner L. Barriers to employment among persons with mental illness: a review of the literature. New Brunswick: Rutgers University; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Unger D, Kregel J. Employers’ knowledge and utilization of accommodations. Work. 2003;21(1):5–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mancuso L. Reasonable accommodation for workers with psychiatric disabilities. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1990;14(2):3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mizzoni C, Kirsh B. Employer perspectives on supervising individuals with mental health problems. Can J Community Ment Health. 2006;25(2):193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Banks B, Charleston S, Grossi T, Mank D. Workplace supports, job performance, and integration outcomes for people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001;24(4):389–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf Libr J. 2009;26(2):91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saunders SL, Nedelec B. What work means to people with work disability: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;1–11. doi:10.1007/s10926-013-9436-y.

  18. Letts L, Wilkins S, Law M, Stewart D, Bosch J, Westmorland M. Critical review form—qualitative studies (version 2.0). Hamilton: McMaster University; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1(3):176–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Curtin M, Fossey E. Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: guidelines for occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J. 2007;54:88–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wåhlin C, Ekberg K, Persson J, Bernfort L, Öberg B. Evaluation of self-reported work ability and usefulness of interventions among sick-listed patients. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):32–43. doi:10.1007/s10926-012-9376-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Rijk A, Nijhuis F, Alexanderson K. Gender differences in work modifications and changed job characteristics during the return-to-work process: a prospective cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(2):185–93. doi:10.1007/s10926-009-9168-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fabian ES, Waterworth A, Ripke B. Reasonable accommodations for workers with serious mental illness: Type, frequency, and associated outcomes. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1993;17(2):163–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Granger B, Baron R, Robinson S. Findings from a national survey of job coaches and job developers about job accommodations arranged between employers and people with psychiatric disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 1997;9(3):235–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Granger B. The role of psychiatric rehabilitation practitioners in assisting people in understanding how to best assert their ADA rights and arrange job accommodations. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2000;23(3):215–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zwerling C, Whitten PS, Sprince NL, Davis CS, Wallace RB, Blanck P, et al. Workplace accommodations for people with disabilities: National Health Interview Survey Disability Supplement, 1994–1995. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45(5):517–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. MacDonald-Wilson KL, Rogers ES, Massaro J. Identifying relationships between functional limitations, job accommodations, and demographic characteristics of persons with psychiatric disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2003;18(1):15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  28. King J, Cleary C, Harris MG, Lloyd C, Waghorn G. Employment-related information for clients receiving mental health services and clinicians. Work. 2011;39(3):291–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gewurtz R, Kirsh B. Disruption, disbelief and resistance: a meta-synthesis of disability in the workplace. Work. 2009;34(1):33–44. doi:10.3233/WOR-2009-0900.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schartz HA, Hendricks DJ, Blanck P. Workplace accommodations: evidence based outcomes. Work. 2006;27(4):345–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Walls RT, Hendricks DJ, Dowler DL, Hirsh AE, Orslene LE, Fullmer CL. Job accommodation resources: lessons from the global neighborhood. J Rehabil. 2002;68(4):34–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Employment Assistance Fund. Australian Government. 2013. http://jobaccess.gov.au/content/employment-assistance-fund. Accessed June 16 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Occupational Therapy, La Trobe University, Victoria, 3086, Australia

    Caitlin McDowell & Ellie Fossey

Authors
  1. Caitlin McDowell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ellie Fossey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellie Fossey.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 Evidence table
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McDowell, C., Fossey, E. Workplace Accommodations for People with Mental Illness: A Scoping Review. J Occup Rehabil 25, 197–206 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9512-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9512-y

Keywords

  • Workplace accommodations
  • Work rehabilitation
  • Mental illness
  • Scoping review