Factors Affecting the Acceptance of People with Disabilities at Work: A Literature Review

Abstract

Purpose A lack of social acceptance by non-disabled co-workers is often the reason why employees with disabilities fail to stay in regular organizations for sustained periods. The aim of the study is to present a coherent review of the extant literature on factors affecting the acceptance of people with disabilities in regular employment. Method We conducted a search of the electronic databases PsychINFO and Web of Science (period: 1996–2011) supplemented with a search for additional relevant articles by means of cross-referencing. In total 48 articles were selected, coded and analyzed by three coders into three overarching themes. Results The analysis of included articles shows that the acceptance of employees with disabilities is influenced by three main variable groups: characteristics of co-workers, of the persons with disabilities and of the employers/organizations. Most studies present factors that influence co-workers’ or employers’ attitudes toward employees with disabilities such as demographic variables. Conclusion Although, recent research has started to accumulate findings on factors that affect the acceptance of employees with disabilities, many gaps remain in the understanding of the concept of acceptance and its relation to the employment of people with disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    These numbers have to be interpreted carefully as data are inconsistent across countries. Besides different interpretations of the concept disability, the numbers partly include sheltered work or supported employment for those countries that offer these opportunities to people with disabilities.

References

  1. 1.

    Landy FJ, Conte JM. Work in the 21st century: an introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jahoda M. Work, employment, and unemployment: values, theories, and approaches in social research. Am Psychol. 1981;36(2):184–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Paul KI, Batinic B. The need for work: Jahoda’s latent functions of employment in a representative sample of the German population. J Organ Behav. 2010;31(1):45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Paul KI, Geithner E, Moser K. Latent deprivation among people who are employed, unemployed, or out of the labor force. J Psychol. 2009;143(5):477–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hoare PN, Machin MA. Maintaining wellbeing during unemployment. Aust J Career Dev. 2006;15(1):19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wanberg CR, Griffiths RF, Gavin MB. Time structure and unemployment: a longitudinal investigation. J Occup Organ Psych. 1997;70:75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Creed PA, Evans BM. Personality, well-being and deprivation theory. Pers Indiv Differ. 2002;33(7):1045–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hall E. Spaces of social inclusion and belonging for people with intellectual disabilities. J Intell Disabil Res. 2010;54(Suppl 1):48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Isaac R, Dharma Raja BW, Ravanan MP. Integrating people with disabilities: their right—our responsibility. Disabil Soc. 2010;25(5):627–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    O’Grady A, Pleasence P, Balmer NJ, Buck A, Genn H. Disability, social exclusion and the consequential experience of justiciable problems. Disabil Soc. 2004;19(3):259–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Antonak RF, Livneh H. Measurement of attitudes towards persons with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22(5):211–24.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. Paris: OECD; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hall E. Social geographies of learning disability: narratives of exclusion and inclusion. Area.(2004); doi:10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00227.x.

  16. 16.

    Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull. 1995;117(3):497–529.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Richman LS, Leary MR. Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: a multimotive model. Psychol Rev. 2009;116(2):365–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Thau S, Aquino K, Poortvliet PM. Self-defeating behaviors in organizations: the relationship between thwarted belonging and interpersonal work behaviors. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(3):840–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wu LZ, Yim FHK, Kwan HK, Zhang XM. Coping with workplace ostracism: the roles of ingratiation and political skill in employee psychological distress. J Manage Stud. 2012;49(1):178–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    DeWall CN, Bushman BJ. Social acceptance and rejection: the sweet and the bitter. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2011;20(4):256–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    van der Klink JJL, Bültmann U, Brouwer S, Burdorf A, Schaufeli WB, Zijlstra FRH, et al. Duurzame inzetbaarheid bij oudere werknemers, werk als waarde. Gedrag en Organisatie. 2011;24(4):342–56.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Stone DL, Colella A. A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Acad Manage Rev. 1996;21(2):352–401.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Scior K. Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs regarding intellectual disability: a systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(6):2164–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gewurtz R, Kirsh B. Disruption, disbelief and resistance: a meta-synthesis of disability in the workplace. Work. 2009;34(1):33–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kirsh B, Stergiou-Kita M, Gewurtz R, Dawson D, Krupa T, Lysaght R, et al. From margins to mainstream: what do we know about work integration for persons with brain injury, mental illness and intellectual disability? Work. 2009;32(4):391–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    United Nations enable. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations. (2006); http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?navid=14&pid=150. Accessed 19 Jun 2012.

  27. 27.

    US Department of Justice. The Americans with disabilities act of 1990. US Department of Justice. (1990); http://www.ada.gov/pubs/ada.htm. Accessed 19 Jun 2012.

  28. 28.

    Administration for Children and Families. The developmental disabilities assistance and bill of rights act of 2000. US Department of Health and Human Services. (2000); http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/add/ddact/DDA.html. Accessed 19 Jun 2012.

  29. 29.

    Gates LB, Akabas SH, Oran-Sabia V. Relationship accommodations involving the work group: improving work prognosis for persons with mental health conditions. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1998;21(3):264–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lau JTF, Cheung CK. Discriminatory attitudes to people with intellectual disability or mental health difficulty. Int Soc Work. 1999;42(4):431–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cramm JM, Tebra N, Finkenflügel H. Colleagues’ perception of supported employee performance. J Policy Pract Intell Disabil. 2008;5(4):269–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    McLaughlin ME, Bell MP, Stringer DY. Stigma and acceptance of persons with disabilities—Understudied aspects of workforce diversity. Group Organ Manage. 2004;29(3):302–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Amick III BC, Habeck RV, Hunt A, Fossel AH, Chapin A, Keller RB, et al. Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management. J Occup Rehabil. 2000;10(1):21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Angermeyer MC, Beck M, Dietrich S, Holzinger A. The stigma of mental illness: patients’ anticipations and experiences. Int J Soc Psychiatr. 2004;50(2):153–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Banks B, Charleston S, Grossi T, Mank D. Workplace supports, job performance, and integration outcomes for people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001;24(4):389–96.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bruyére SM, Erickson WA, VanLooy S. Comparative study of workplace policy and practices contributing to disability nondiscrimination. Rehabil Psychol. 2004;49(1):28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Burge P, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Lysaght R. Public views on employment of people with intellectual disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2007;26:29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Butterworth J, Hagner D, Helm DT, Whelley TA. Workplace culture, social interactions, and supports for transition-age young adults. Ment Retard. 2000;38(4):342–53.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chadsey JG, Sheldon DL, Horn JR, Bardeleben D, Cimera RE. Description of variables impacting successful and unsuccessful cases of social integration involving co-workers. J Vocat Rehabil. 1999;12(2):103–11.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Colella A, DeNisi AS, Varma A. The impact of ratee’s disability on performance judgments and choice as partner: the role of disability-job fit stereotypes and interdependence of rewards. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83(1):102–11.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Colella A, Varma A. Disability-job fit stereotypes and the evaluation of persons with disabilities at work. J Occup Rehabil. 1999;9(2):79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Colella A, Varma A. The impact of subordinate disability on leader-member exchange relationships. Acad Manage J. 2001;44(2):304–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Fillary R, Pernice R. Social inclusion in workplaces where people with intellectual disabilities are employed: implications for supported employment professionals. Int J Rehabil Res. 2006;29(1):31–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    García MF, Paetzold RL, Colella A. The relationship between personality and peers’ judgments of the appropriateness of accommodations for individuals with disabilities. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2005;35(7):1418–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Gilbride D, Stensrud R, Vandergoot D, Golden K. Identification of the characteristics of work environments and employers open to hiring and accommodating people with disabilities. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2003;46(3):130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Habeck R, Hunt A, Rachel CH, Kregel J, Chan F. Employee retention and integrated disability management practices as demand side factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(4):443–55.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hand C, Tryssenaar J. Small business employers’ views on hiring individuals with mental illness. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2006;29(3):166–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Harlan SL, Robert PM. The social construction of disability in organizations—why employers resist reasonable accommodation. Work Occup. 1998;25(4):397–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hartnett HP, Stuart H, Thurman H, Loy B, Batiste LC. Employers’ perceptions of the benefits of workplace accommodations: reasons to hire, retain and promote people with disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2011;34(1):17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Henry D, Keys C, Balcazar F, Jopp D. Attitudes of community living staff members toward persons with mental retardation, mental illness, and dual diagnosis. Ment Retard. 1996;34(6):367–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Henry DB, Duvdevany I, Keys CB, Balcazar FE. Attitudes of American and Israeli staff toward people with intellectual disabilities. Ment Retard. 2004;42(1):26–36.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Honey A. The impact of mental illness on employment: consumers’ perspectives. Work. 2003;20(3):267–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Horner-Johnson W, Keys C, Henry D, Yamaki K, Oi F, Watanabe K, et al. Attitudes of Japanese students toward people with intellectual disability. J Intell Disabil Res. 2002;46:365–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Jones J, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Vilela T, Brown H. Attitudes of community developmental services agency staff toward issues of inclusion for individuals with intellectual disabilities. J Policy Pract Intell Disabil. 2008;5(4):219–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kaye H, Jans L, Jones E. Why don’t employers hire and retain workers with disabilities? J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(4):526–36.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kulkarni M, Lengnick-Hall ML. Socialization of people with disabilities in the workplace. Hum Resource Manage. 2011;50(4):521–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Martz E. Facilitating inclusive employment: an examination of the accommodations for and the barriers to employment for Russians with disabilities. Int J Rehabil Res. 2007;30(4):321–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Morgan RL, Alexander M. The employer’s perception: employment of individuals with developmental disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2005;23:39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Novak J, Jo Feyes K, Christensen KA. Application of intergroup contact theory to the integrated workplace: setting the stage for inclusion. J Vocat Rehabil. 2011;35:211–26.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ouellette-Kuntz H, Burge P, Henry DB, Bradley EA, Leichner P. Attitudes of senior psychiatry residents toward persons with intellectual disabilities. Can J Psychiat. 2003;48(8):538–45.

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Paetzold RL, García MF, Colella A, Ren LR, del Carmen Triana M, Ziebro M. Perceptions of people with disabilities: when is accommodation fair? Basic Appl Soc Psych. 2008;30(1):27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Popovich PM, Scherbaum CA, Scherbaum KL, Polinko N. The assessment of attitudes toward individuals with disabilities in the workplace. J Psychol. 2003;137(2):163–77.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Rollins AL, Bond GR, Jones AM, Kukla M, Collins LA. Workplace social networks and their relationship with job outcomes and other employment characteristics for people with severe mental illness. J Vocat Rehabil. 2011;35:243–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Rollins AL, Mueser KT, Bond GR, Becker DR. Social relationships at work: does the employment model make a difference? Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2002;26(1):51–61.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ross GF. Ethics, trust and expectations regarding the treatment of disabled staff within a tourism/hospitality industry context. Int J Hosp Manag. 2004;23(5):523–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Russinova Z, Griffin S, Bloch P, Wewiorski NJ, Rosoklija I. Workplace prejudice and discrimination toward individuals with mental illnesses. J Vocat Rehabil. 2011;35:227–41.

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Scheid TL. Stigma as a barrier to employment: mental disability and the Americans with disabilities act. Int J Law Psychiat. 2005;28(6):670–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Scherbaum CA, Scherbaum KL, Popovich PM. Predicting job-related expectancies and affective reactions to employees with disabilities from previous work experience. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2005;35(5):889–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Schur L, Kruse D, Blasi J, Blanck P. Is disability disabling in all workplaces? Workplace disparities and corporate culture. Ind Relat. 2009;48(3):381–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Schwartz C, Armony-Sivan R. Students’ attitudes to the inclusion of people with disabilities in the community. Disabil Soc. 2001;16(3):403–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Solovieva TI, Dowler DL, Walls RT. Employer benefits from making workplace accommodations. Disabil Health J. 2011;4(1):39–45.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Varekamp I, van Dijk FJH. Workplace problems and solutions for employees with chronic diseases. Occup Med. 2010;60(4):287–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Vilà M, Pallisera M, Fullana J. Work integration of people with disabilities in the regular labour market: what can we do to improve these processes? J Intellec Dev Dis. 2007;32(1):10–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Westmorland MG, Williams RM, Amick III BC, Shannon H, Rasheed F. Disability management practices in Ontario workplaces: employees’ perceptions. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(14):825–35.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Williams-Whitt K. Impediments to disability accommodation. Ind Relat. 2007;62(3):405–32.

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Yazbeck M, McVilly K, Parmenter T. Attitudes toward people with intellectual disability (ID): an Australian perspective. J Disabil Policy Stud. (2004); doi:10.1177/10442073040150020401.

  80. 80.

    Jiranek D, Kirby N. The job satisfaction and/or psychological well being of young adults with an intellectual disability and nondisabled young adults in either sheltered employment, competitive employment or unemployment. Aust NZ J Dev Disabil. 1990;16(2):133–48.

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Griffin DK, Rosenberg H, Cheyney W, Greenberg B. A comparison of self-esteem and job satisfaction of adults with mild mental retardation in sheltered workshops and supported employment. Educ Train Ment Ret. 1996;31(2):142–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by the Atlant group, an organization for sheltered and supported employment.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Vornholt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vornholt, K., Uitdewilligen, S. & Nijhuis, F.J.N. Factors Affecting the Acceptance of People with Disabilities at Work: A Literature Review. J Occup Rehabil 23, 463–475 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9426-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • People with disabilities
  • Employee acceptance
  • Sustainable employment
  • Literature review