Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Leadership Effectiveness: A Supervisor’s Approach to Manage Return to Work

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose To investigate adaptive leadership in relation to personnel sickness absence (SA). In situational leadership, supervisors are effective if they adapt their leadership style appropriately to a given situation. Methods A managerial reorganization in a Dutch hospital with reassignment of supervisors provided the opportunity to compare SA in the same wards while under the leadership of different supervisors. Leadership effectiveness was measured with the Leader Effectiveness and Adaptability Description (LEAD). Personnel SA was retrieved from employer’s records and cumulated at the individual level, distinguishing between short-term (1–7 day) and long-term (>7 days) SA. Cumulated SA days and mean SA lengths before and after managerial reorganization were compared at the individual level by using non-parametric paired statistical analyses. Employer’s costs to compensate sick-listed employees’ salaries before and after reorganization were cumulated and compared at ward level by using non-parametric statistics. Results 6 wards (N = 403) retained the same supervisor, 6 wards (N = 504) were assigned more effective supervisors, and 4 wards (N = 184) got less effective supervisors than the ones before reorganization. Cumulated short-term SA days and lengths did not change with leadership effectiveness. Employees who got more effective supervisors had fewer long-term SA days and shorter long-term SA lengths than before reorganization. More effective supervisors saved an average of 21,368 Euros per ward, particularly due to less long-term SA. Conclusions Long-term SA was shorter after employees got more effective supervisors. Adaptive supervisors can facilitate return to work and save SA costs by providing the right type of support to sick-listed employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rankin I. Managing long-term sickness absence: the 2009 IRS survey. IRS Employ Rev. 2009;992:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Managing sickness absence in the NHS. http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/AuditCommissionReports/NationalStudies/20110210managingsicknessabsence.pdf (2011). Accessed 28 Sep 2012.

  3. Managing sickness absence and return to work. http://www.hse.gov.uk/sicknessabsence/ (2011). Accessed 28 Sep 2012.

  4. Janssen N, van den Heuvel WP, Beurskens AJ, Nijhuis FJ, Schröer CA, van Eijk JT. The demand–control–support model as predictor of return to work. Int J Rehabil Res. 2003;26(1):1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Feuerstein M, Berkowitz SM, Haufler AJ, Lopez MS, Huang GD. Working with low back pain: workplace and individual psychosocial determinants of limited duty and lost time. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(6):627–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A, Liira J, Vainio H. Leadership, job well-being, and health effects: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50(8):904–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Väänänen A, Toppinen-Tanner S, Kalimo R, Mutanen P, Vahtera J, Peiro JM. Job characteristics, physical and psychological symptoms, and social support as antecedents of sickness absence among men and women in the private industrial sector. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(5):807–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nielsen ML, Rugulies R, Christensen KB, Smith-Hansen L, Kristensen TS. Psychosocial work environment predictors of short and long spells of registered sickness absence during a 2-year follow-up. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48(6):591–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Labriola M, Christensen KB, Lund T, Nielsen ML, Diderichsen F. Multilevel analysis of workplace and individual risk factors for long-term sickness absence. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48(9):923–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Rudolph L, Brand RJ. Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med 40(4):374–92.

  11. Post M, Krol B, Groothoff JW. Work-related determinants of return to work of employees on long-term sickness absence. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(9):481–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aas RW, Ellingsen KL, Lindøe P, Möller A. Leadership qualities in the return to work process: a content analysis. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(4):335–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bass BM, Bass R. Handbook of leadership: theory, research, and application. New York: Free Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vroom VH, Yago AG. The role of situation in leadership. Am Psychol. 2007;62(1):17–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cubero CG. Situational leadership and persons with disabilities. Work. 2007;29(4):351–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hersey P, Blanchard KH. Management of organizational behavior, utilizing human resources. NJ: Prentice Hall; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Blanchard KH. Leading at a higher level. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schreuder JA, Roelen CA, van Zweeden NF, Jongsma D, van der Klink JJ, Groothoff JW. Leadership styles of nurse managers and registered sickness absence among their nursing staff. Health Care Manag Rev. 2011;36(1):58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schreuder JA, Roelen CA, van Zweeden NF, Jongsma D, van der Klink JJ, Groothoff JW. Leadership effectiveness and recorded sickness absence among nursing staff: a cross-sectional pilot study. J Nurs Manag. 2011;19(5):585–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Franche RL, Corbière M, Lee H, Breslin FC, Hepburn CG. Readiness for return-to-work (RRTW) scale: development and validation of a self-report staging scale in lost-time claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):450–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Allebeck P, Mastekaasa A. Causes of sickness absence: research approaches and explanatory models. Scand J Public Health. 2004;32(suppl 63):36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Steers RM, Rhodes SR. Knowledge and speculation about absenteeism: new approaches to understanding, measuring, and managing employee absence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fichman M. A theoretical approach to understanding employee absence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Johansson G, Lundberg I. Adjustment latitude and attendance requirements as determinants of sickness absence or attendance: empirical tests of the illness flexibility model. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(10):1857–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kristensen TS. Sickness absence and work strain among Danish slaughterhouse workers: an analysis of absence from work regarded as coping behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(1):15–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kohler S, Matthieu J. Individual characteristics, work perceptions, and affective reactions influences on differentiated sickness absence criteria. J Organ Behav. 1993;14(6):515–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hackett RD, Bycio P. An evaluation of employee absenteeism as coping mechanism among hospital nurses. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1996;69(4):327–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Petrie KJ, Weinman JA. Perceptions of health and illness: current research and applications. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Henderson M, Glozier N, Holland Elliot K. Long term sickness absence. BMJ. 2005;330(7495):802–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Aviolo BJ, Walumbwa FO, Weber TJ. Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:421–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. http://learn.uci.edu/media/F07/99114/LEADExercise.doc. Accessed 28 Sep 2012.

  33. Johnson K, d’Argenio C. Management training effects on nurse manager leadership behaviour. Nurs Econ. 1991;9(4):249–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Eurocontrol Guidelines. http://www.eurocontrol.int/humanfactors/gallery/content/public/docs/CT%20Tools%20Compendium_Annex_A_released%20Issue.pdf, p 103–11. Accessed 28 Sep 2012.

  35. Johansen B. Situational leadership: a review of the research. Hum Res Dev Quart. 1990;1(1):73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Munir F, Yarker J, Hicks B, Donaldson-Feilder E. Returning employees back to work: developing a measure for supervisors to support return to work (SSRW). J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(2):196–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JH, de Boer AG, Blonk RW, van Dijk FJ. Supervisory behaviour as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work duet o mental health problems. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(10):57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nordqvist C, Holmqvist C, Alexanderson K. Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(1):11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Deelstra JT. The downside of social support. About the negative effects of social support at work. Utrecht: University Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ferrie JE, Kivimäki M, Head J, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, Marmot MG. A comparison of self-reported sickness absence with absences recorded in employers’ registers: evidence from the Whitehall II study. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62(2):74–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Grøvle L, Haugen AJ, Keller A, Natvig B, Brox JI, Grotle M. Poor agreement found between self-report and a public registry on duration of sickness absence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(2):212–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lueder D. Don’t be mislead by LEAD. J Appl Behav Sci. 1985;21(2):143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):233–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dellve L, Skagert K, Vilhelmsson R. Leadership in workplace health promotion projects: 1-and 2-year effects on long-term work attendance. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17(5):471–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kuoppala J, Lamminpää A, Husman P. Work health promotion, job well-being, and sickness absences: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50(11):1216–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden AJ, Wright K, Whitehead M, Petticrew M. Working for health? Evidence from systematic reviews on the effects on health and health inequalities of organisational changes to the psychosocial work environment. Prev Med. 2009;48(5):454–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Noyes B. Midlevel management education. J Nurs Admin. 2002;32:25–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tourangeau A. Building nurse leader capacity. J Nurs Admin. 2003;33(12):624–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sherman RO, Eggenberger T, Bishop M, Karden R. Development of a leadership competency model. J Nurs Admin. 2007;37(1):85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mineyama S, Tsutsumi A, Takao S, Nishiuchi K, Kawakami N. Superivors’ attitudes and skills for active listening with regard to working conditions and psychological stress reactions among subordinate workers. J Occup Health. 2007;49(1):81–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands

    J. A. H. Schreuder, J. W. Groothoff, J. J. L. van der Klink & C. A. M. Roelen

  2. Nij Smellinghe Hospital, PO Box 20200, 9200 DA, Drachten, The Netherlands

    J. A. H. Schreuder, D. Jongsma & N. F. van Zweeden

Authors
  1. J. A. H. Schreuder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. W. Groothoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Jongsma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. F. van Zweeden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. J. L. van der Klink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. A. M. Roelen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. H. Schreuder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schreuder, J.A.H., Groothoff, J.W., Jongsma, D. et al. Leadership Effectiveness: A Supervisor’s Approach to Manage Return to Work. J Occup Rehabil 23, 428–437 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9409-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9409-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation