Skip to main content

Implementing Interorganizational Cooperation in Labour Market Reintegration: A Case Study

Abstract

Introduction To bring people with complex medical, social and vocational needs back to the labour market, interorganizational cooperation is often needed. Yet, studies of processes and strategies for achieving sustainable interorganizational cooperation are sparse. The aim of this study was to analyse the implementation processes of Swedish legislation on financial coordination, with specific focus on different strategies for and perspectives on implementing interorganizational cooperation. Methods A multiple-case study was used, where two local associations for financial coordination were studied in order to elucidate and compare the development of cooperative work in two settings. The material, collected during a 3-year period, consisted of documents, individual interviews with managers, and focus groups with officials. Results Two different implementation strategies were identified. In case 1, a linear strategy was used to implement cooperative projects, which led to difficulties in maintaining cooperative work forms due to a fragmented and time-limited implementation process. In case 2, an interactive strategy was used, where managers and politicians were continuously involved in developing a central cooperation team that became a central part of a developing structure for interorganizational cooperation. An interactive cooperation strategy with long-term joint financing was here shown to be successful in overcoming organizational barriers to cooperation. Conclusions It is suggested that a strategy based on adaptation to local conditions, flexibility and constant evaluation is preferred for developing sustainable interorganizational cooperation when implementing policies or legislation affecting interorganizational relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Bültmann U, Sherson D, Olsen J, Hansen CL, Lund T, Kilsgaard J. Coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):81–93.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Franche R-L, Baril R, Shaw W, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):525–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kärrholm J, Ekholm K, Jakobsson B, Ekholm J, Bergroth A, Schüldt K. Effects on work resumption of a co-operation project in vocational rehabilitation systematic, multi-professional, client-centered and solution-oriented co-operation. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(7):457–67.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, Tulder Mv, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–24.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vermeulen SJ, Anema JR, Schellart AJM, Knol DL, van Mechelen W, van der Beek AJ A participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil 2011 (Published online 19 February 2011).

  6. MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chamber L. The “Toxic Dose” of system problems: why some injured workers don’t return to work as expected. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):349–66.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Adm Sci Q. 1967;12(1):1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Axelsson R, Axelsson SB. Integration and collaboration in public health—a conceptual framework. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2006;21:75–88.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandström U, Axelsson R, Lundborg CS. Inter-organisational integration for rehabilitation in Sweden—variation in views on long-term goals. Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wihlman U, Lundborg CS, Axelsson R. Barriers of inter-organisational integration in vocational rehabilitation. Int J Integr Care. 2008;8:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ståhl C, Svensson T, Petersson G, Ekberg K. A matter of trust? a study of coordination of Swedish stakeholders in return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):299–310.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindqvist R, Grape O. Vocational rehabilitation of the socially disadvantaged long-term sick: inter-organizational co-operation between welfare state agencies. Scand J Public Health. 1999;1:5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johansson S. Implementing evidence-based practices and programmes in the human services: lessons from research in public administration. Eur J Soc Work. 2010;13(1):109–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hill M, Hupe P. Implementing public policy: governance in Theory and in practice. London: Sage; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nutley SM, Walter I, Davies HTO. Using evidence: how research can inform public services. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Panzano PC, Seffrin BA, Chaney-Jones S (2005) The innovation diffusion and adoption research project (IDARP): moving from the diffusion of research results to promoting the adoption of evidence-based innovations in the Ohio mental health system: Ohio department of mental health, 16.

  20. Ellström P-E. Practice-based innovation: a learning perspective. J Workplace Learn. 2010;22(1/2):27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. London: Sage; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Czarniawska B. Narratives in social science research. London: Sage; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brunarski D, Shaw L, Doupe L. Moving toward virtual interdisciplinary teams and a multi-stakeholder approach in community-based return-to-work care. Work. 2008;30(3):329–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Friesen MN, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2001;17(1):11–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wihlman U, Lundborg CS, Holmström I, Axelsson R. Organizing vocational rehabilitation through interorganizational integration—a case study in Sweden. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011;26:e169–85.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Ståhl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ståhl, C. Implementing Interorganizational Cooperation in Labour Market Reintegration: A Case Study. J Occup Rehabil 22, 209–219 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9337-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9337-x

Keywords

  • Organizational case studies
  • Sick-leave
  • Unemployment
  • Work disability
  • Implementation