Skip to main content
Log in

Returning Employees Back to Work: Developing a Measure for Supervisors to Support Return to Work (SSRW)

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction Evidence suggests that supervisors’ behaviors have a strong influence on employees’ health and well-being outcomes. Few have examined the specific behaviors associated with managing an employee back to work following long-term sick leave. This study describes the development of a behavior measure for Supervisors to Support Return to Work (SSRW) using qualitative and quantitative research methods. Methods Qualitative data were collected between 2008 and 2010 from a UK population of organisational stakeholders (N = 142), line managers (N = 20) and employees (N = 26). Data from these samples were used to develop a 42 item questionnaire and to validate it using a further sample of line managers (N = 186) and employees (N = 359). Results Based on a factor structure and reliability results, four scales emerged. The measure demonstrated good internal reliability, construct and concurrent validity. Longitudinal data analyses demonstrated test–retest reliability and promising predictive validity. Conclusions This is a potentially valuable tool in research and in organisational settings, both during long-term sick leave and after employees have returned to work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Health Safety Executive self-report work-related illness. 2003/2004. Available from http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics.

  2. Henderson M, Glozier N, Elliot KH. Long term sickness absence. BMJ. 2005;330:802–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pryce J, Munir F, Haslam C. Cancer survivorship and work: symptoms, supervisor response, co-workers’ disclosure and work adjustments. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Escriba-Aguir V, Perez-Hoyos S. Psychological well-being and psychosocial work environment characteristics among emergency and medical staff. Stress Health. 2007;23:153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Skakon J, Nielsen K, Borg V, Guzman J. Are leaders’ well-being, behaviors and style associated with the affective well-being of their employees? A systematic review of three decades of research. Work Stress. 2010;24:107–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baruch-Feldman C, Brondolo E, Ben-Dayan D, Schwartz J. Sources of social support and burnout, job satisfaction and productivity. J Occup Health Psychol. 2002;7:84–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stansfeld SA, Rael GS, Head J, Shipley M, Marmot M. Social support and psychiatric sickness absence: a prospective study of British Civil Servants. Psychol Med. 1997;27:35–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Netterstrom B, Conrad N, Bech P, Fink P, Olsen O, Rugulies R, Stansfeld S. The relation between work-related psychosocial factors and the development of depression. Epidemiol Rev. 2008;30:118–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas LT, Ganster DC. Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Appl Psychol. 1995;80:6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bass BM. Bass Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: theory, research, and managerial applications. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen ML, Rugulies R, Christensen KB, Smith-Hansen L, Kristensen TS. Psychosocial work environment predictors of short and long spells of registered sickness absence during a 2-year follow up. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:591–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Väänänen A, Toppinen-Tanner S, Kalimo R, Mutanen P, Vahtera J, Peiro JM. Job characteristics, physical and psychological symptoms, and social support as antecedents of sickness absence among men and women in the private industrial sector. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:807–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Labriola M, Lund T, Burr H. Prospective study of physical and psychosocial risk factors for sickness absence. Occup Med. 2006;56:469–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saksvik PO, Nytro K, Dahl-Jorgensen C, Mikkelsen A. A process evaluation of individual and organisational occupational stress and health interventions. Work Stress. 2002;16:37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rick J, Thompson L. Managers’ roles in rehabilitation for work-related stress. In: Proceedings of the division of occupational psychology conference. British Psychological Society, UK, 2004.

  16. Bevan S. Attendance management. London: The Work Foundation; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Black C. Working for a healthier tomorrow. London: The Stationary office; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holmgren K, Ivanoff SD. Supervisors views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:93–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JHAM, De Boer AGEM, Blonk RWB, Van Djik FJH. Supervisory behavior as a predictor of return to work in employee absent from work due mental health problems. Occup Environ Med. 2006;61:817–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ashby K, Mahdon M. Why do employees come to work when ill? An investigation into sickness presence in the workplace. London: The Work Foundation; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pransky J, Shaw W, Loisel P, Hong QN, Desorcy B. Development and validation of competencies for return-to-work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:41–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aas RW, Ellingsen KJ, Lindøe P, Möller A. Leadership qualities in the return to work process: A content analysis. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:335–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wynne-Jones G, Buck R, Porteous C, Cooper L, Button LA, Main CJ, Phillips CJ. What happens to work if you are unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;1:31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rankin I. Managing long-term sickness absence: the 2009 IRS survey. IRS Employ Rev. 2009;992:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Flanagan JC. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull. 1954;51:327–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Miles MB, Huberman MA. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dasborough MT. Cognitive asymmetry in employee emotional reactions to leadership behaviors. Lead Q. 2009;17:163–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Donald I. Facet theory: defining research domains. In: Breakwell GM, Hammond S, Fife-Shaw C, et al., editors. Research methods in psychology. London: Sage; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Coolican H. Research methods and statistics in psychology. London: Hodder and Staughton; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Goldberg D. GHQ-12. London: NFER-Nelson; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gillbreath B, Benson PG. The contribution of supervisor behavior to employee psychological well-being. Work Stress. 2004;18:255–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nagy MS. Using a single-time approach to measure facet job satisfaction. J Occup Org Psychol. 2002;75:77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wanous JP, Reichers AE, Hudy MJ. Overall job satisfaction: How good are single item measures? J App Psychol. 1997;82:247–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Stewart A, Ware J. Measuring functioning and wellbeing: the medical outcomes approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1992. p. 373–403.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lerner D, Amick B III. Glaxo welcome. Work limitations questionnaire. Boston: The Health Institute. Tufts-New England Medical Center; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bond FW, Bunce D. Job control mediates change in a work reorganization intervention for stress reduction. J Occup Health Psychol. 2001;6:290–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ferguson E, Cox T. Exploratory factor analysis: a user’s guide. Int J Select Assess. 1993;1:84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nunnally JC. Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw Hill; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Van Horn JE, Taris T, Schaufeli WB, Schreurs PA. The structure of occupational well-being: a study among Dutch teachers. J Occup Org Psychol. 2004;77:365–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Franche R-L, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of healthcare, workplace and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:233–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. MacKenzie EJ, Morris JA, Jurkovich GJ, Yasui Y, Cushing BM, Burgess AR, DeLateur BJ, McAndrew MP, Swiontkowski MF. Return to work following injury: the role of economic, social and job-related factors. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1630–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all participating organisations and stakeholders for their support. We would also like to thank the line managers and employees who took part. This research was funded by the British Occupational Health Research Foundation (BOHRF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fehmidah Munir.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 51 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munir, F., Yarker, J., Hicks, B. et al. Returning Employees Back to Work: Developing a Measure for Supervisors to Support Return to Work (SSRW). J Occup Rehabil 22, 196–208 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9331-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9331-3

Keywords

Navigation