Challenges to Remaining at Work with Common Health Problems: What Helps and What Influence Do Organisational Policies Have?
- 334 Downloads
Introduction: Common health problems have a significant impact on work productivity (presenteeism), and sickness absence. The aim of this study was to examine the attitudes and beliefs of employees in the public sector about common health problems and work using the Flags system as a conceptual framework to identify problems and potential solutions. Method: 63 employees took part in 14 focus groups in two public sector organisations. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically using NVivo. Results: The study confirmed the importance of heath-focused clinical factors (Yellow flags), perceptions of work (Blue flags), and more objective characteristics of work and organisational policies (Black flags), which emerged as major themes. The social and moral norms surrounding sickness absence and presenteeism were frequently discussed, including the impact of absence on colleagues, guilt, legitimising illness, and trust. There were interactions between the different Flags, often mediated by managers via their relationships with employees and their role in implementing organisational policy. Conclusions: The Flags system was useful as a conceptual framework in this context for identifying a number of obstacles to working with health problems, many of which were potentially modifiable on worker, workplace, or wider systems levels.
KeywordsCommon health problems Flags Work Presenteeism Absenteeism
- 4.Hemp P. Presenteeism: at work–but out of it. Harv Bus Rev. 2004;82(10):49–58, 155.Google Scholar
- 5.Johns G. Absenteeism and presenteeism: not at work or not working well. In: Cooper CL, Barling J, editors. The Sage handbook of organizational behaviour. London: Sage; 2008. p. 160–77.Google Scholar
- 6.Phillips C. The costs and burden of chronic pain. Rev Pain. 2009;3(1):1–5.Google Scholar
- 8.Waddell G, Aylward M. The scientific and conceptual basis of incapacity benefits. London: The Stationary Office; 2005.Google Scholar
- 10.Buck R, Wynne-Jones G, Varnava A, Main CJ, Phillips CJ. Working with musculoskeletal pain. Rev Pain. 2009;3(1):6–10.Google Scholar
- 11.Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and wellbeing? London: TSO; 2006.Google Scholar
- 13.Johns G. Presenteeism in the workplace: a review and research agenda. J Organ Behav. 2010; Advanced view published online July 2009.Google Scholar
- 16.Main CJ, Sullivan MJ, Watson PJ. Pain and work: organisational perspectives. Pain management: practical application of the biopsychosocial perspective in clinical and occupational settings. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2007. p. 369–91.Google Scholar
- 20.Kendall N, Burton AK, Main CJ, Watson PJ. Tackling musculoskeletal problems: a guide for clinc and workplace (A new method of identifying obstacles using the psychsocial falgs framework). London: The Stationary Office; 2009.Google Scholar
- 21.Main CJ, Burton AK. Economic and occupational influences on pain and disability. In: Main CJ, Spanswick CC, editors. Pain management: an interdisciplinary approach. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 63–87.Google Scholar
- 23.Kendall N, Linton SL, Main CJ. Guide to assessing psychosocial yellow flags in acute low back pain: risk factors for long term disability and work loss. Wellington, New Zealand: Accident Rehabilitation and Compenstaino Insurance Compensation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee; 1997.Google Scholar
- 27.Blaxter M. Health. Cambridge: Policy Press; 2004.Google Scholar
- 30.Wynne-Jones G, Katie Webb, Buck R, Cooper L, Button L, Main CJ, Phillips CJ. What happens to work if you’re unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in public sector organisations, J Occup Rehabil. 2010. Online first doi:10.1007/s10926-010-9251-7.
- 31.Grove B, Secker J, Seebohm P. New thinking about mental health and employment. Oxford: Radcliff Publishing; 2005.Google Scholar
- 33.Parsons T. The social system. New York: Free Press; 1951.Google Scholar