Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Occupational Rehabilitation in Hong Kong: Current Status and Future Needs

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: This paper reviews the development of occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong, both in terms of the science as well as the service for injured workers. Besides, it also reviews the existing Employees’ Compensation Ordinance for work injury to illustrate how the policy could influence the success and development of the discipline. Methods: Five experienced occupational rehabilitation providers, including 1 occupational medicine specialist, 3 occupational therapists, and 1 physiotherapist critically reviewed the past and current development of occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong as well as the local contextual factors, which could influence its future development. Results: Since the enactment of the Employees’ Compensation Ordinance in the 1950s, there have been progressive improvements in the field of occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong. Services in the early years were mostly based on the biomedical model, where doctors and patients tended to focus on clinical symptoms and physical pathology when making clinical decisions. Since then, remarkable academic achievements have been made in the field locally, from the validation of clinical instruments for assessment of work capacity, assessment of employment readiness to the evaluation of efficacy of interventional programs for injured workers focusing on work related outcomes. However, there has been a relatively lack of progress in the development of related policies and implementation of related programs for occupational rehabilitation. There is no built in linkage between rehabilitation, compensation and prevention in the current system in Hong Kong, and there is no rehabilitation policy specific to those workers with occupational diseases and injuries. Conclusions: There are still deficiencies in the development and provision of occupational rehabilitation services in Hong Kong. Incorporation of requirements for occupational rehabilitation at the legislation and policy levels should be seriously considered in the future. Besides, the development of the Occupational Medicine subspecialty in the public hospital system in Hong Kong is considered a facilitator to the future development of occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feuerstein M. Introduction: the world challenge of work disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):451–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Poon SW, Tang SL, Wong FKL. Management and economics of construction safety in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hong Kong Employees’ Compensation Ordinance (Amended 44 of 1980s. 15); 1953.

  4. Chan KK. Policy and practice of occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong and Guangzhou–a comparative study. Work. 2008;30(1):11–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hong Kong Federation of Insurers. Review of employees’ compensation system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong; 2000.

  6. Health and Welfare Bureau. White paper on rehabilitation. In: Bureau HaW, editor. Hong Kong; 1995.

  7. Chan EY, Woo KW, Tang TM. Occupational rehabilitation services provided by a community workers health centre in Hong Kong: a case study. Work. 2008;30(1):5–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hospital_Authority. Hospital authority annual report 2008–2009; 2010.

  9. Yu I. From concepts to practice. Work. 2008;30:1–2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Labour Department. The voluntary rehabilitation programme: review and way forward; presented in the meeting “Briefing on the Voluntary Rehabilitation Program (VRP) for Work Injuries” (6th December 2006). In: Department L, editor. Hong Kong; 2006.

  11. Labour Department. Recent development of the voluntary rehabilitation program and the way forward; presented in “Briefing on the Voluntary Rehabilitation Program” (10th December 2007). In: Department L, editor. Hong Kong; 2007.

  12. Labour Department. Occupational safety and health statistics 2009. Hong Kong: Labour Department; 2010; Available from: http://www.labour.gov.hk/eng/osh/pdf/OSH_Statistics_2009.pdf.

  13. Hong Kong Federation of Insurers. Medical claims statistics 2008. Hong Kong (30th May 2010); 2008. Available from: www.hkfi.org.hk.

  14. Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Westmorland MG, Buys N. A comparison of disability management practices in Australian and Canadian workplaces. Work. 2004;23(1):31–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaw WS, Feuerstein M, Lincoln AE, Miller VI, Wood PM. Case management services for work related upper extremity disorders. Integrating workplace accommodation and problem solving. AAOHN J. 2001;49(8):378–89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kenny D. Employers’ perspectives on the provision of suitable duties in occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil. 1999;9(4):267–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee GK, Chan CC. Use of dictionary of occupational titles (DOT) on formwork carpentry–a comparison between the United States and Hong Kong. Work. 2003;20(2):103–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee GK, Chan CC, Hui-Chan CW. Consistency of performance on the functional capacity assessment: static strength and dynamic endurance. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(3):189–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng ASK, Cheng SW. The predictive validity of job-specific functional capacity evaluation on the employment status of patients with nonspecific low back pain. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52(7):719–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng AS, Cheng SW. Use of job-specific functional capacity evaluation to predict the return to work of patients with a distal radius fracture. Am J Occup Ther. (Forthcoming, 2010).

  22. Chow JH, Chan CC. Validation of the Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Work. 2005;25(4):307–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan H, Li-Tsang CW, Chan C, Lam CS, Hui KL, Bard C. Validation of Lam assessment of employment readiness (C-LASER) for Chinese injured workers. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(4):697–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee KC, Chiu TT, Lam TH. Psychometric properties of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire in patients with neck pain. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(10):909–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Briand C, Durand MJ, St-Arnaud L, Corbiere M. How well do return-to-work interventions for musculoskeletal conditions address the multicausality of work disability? J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(2):207–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tompa E, de Oliveira C, Dolinschi R, Irvin E. A systematic review of disability management interventions with economic evaluations. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):16–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chan CCH, Li CWP, Hung LK, Lam PCW. A standardized clinical series for work-related lateral epicondylitis. J Occup Rehabil. 2000;10(2):143–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Szeto GP, Straker L, Raine S. A field comparison of neck and shoulder postures in symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers. Appl Ergon. 2002;33(1):75–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Szeto GP, Straker LM, O’Sullivan PB. A comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers performing monotonous keyboard work–1: neck and shoulder muscle recruitment patterns. Man Ther. 2005;10(4):270–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Szeto GP, Straker LM, O’Sullivan PB. EMG median frequency changes in the neck-shoulder stabilizers of symptomatic office workers when challenged by different physical stressors. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2005;15(6):544–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li EJ, Li-Tsang CW, Lam CS, Hui KY, Chan CC. The effect of a “training on work readiness” program for workers with musculoskeletal injuries: a randomized control trial (RCT) study. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(4):529–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li-Tsang CW, Chan HH, Lam CS, Lo-Hui KY, Chan CC. Psychosocial aspects of injured workers’ returning to work (RTW) in Hong Kong. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):279–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cheng ASK, Hung LK. Randomized controlled trial of workplace-based rehabilitation for work-related rotator cuff disorder. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):487–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Feuerstein M, Nicholas RA, Huang GD, Dimberg L, Ali D, Rogers H. Job stress management and ergonomic intervention for work-related upper extremity symptoms. Appl Ergon. 2004;35(6):565–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sullivan MJ, Feuerstein M, Gatchel R, Linton SJ, Pransky G. Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):475–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheng ASK, Hung LK. Socio-demographic predictors of work disability after occupational injuries. Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2007;17(2):45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu YW, Chan CC, Lam CS, Li-Tsang CW, Lo-Hui KY, Gatchel RJ. Rehabilitation of injured workers with chronic pain: a stage of change phenomenon. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(4):727–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lai HS, Chan CC. Implementing a pilot work injury management program in Hong Kong. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(4):712–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chong CS, Cheng ASK. Work injury management model and implication in Hong Kong: a literature review. Work. 2010;35(2):221–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cudney AE. Case management: a serious solution for serious issues. J Healthc Manag. 2002;47(3):149–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Powell SK, Ignatavicius DE. Core Curriculum for case management. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  42. White KR, Bazzoli GJ, Roggenkamp SD, Gu T. Does case management matter as a hospital cost-control strategy? Health Care Manage Rev. 2005;30(1):32–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fried RA. Commentary: absenteeism certification. J Fam Pract. 1988; 26(654–655).

  44. Pransky G, Katz JN, Benjamin K, Himmelstein J. Improving the physician role in evaluating work ability and managing disability: a survey of primary care practitioners. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(16):867–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. List of Registered Doctors (Specialist Registration) [database on the Internet]; 2010 [cited 10 May 2010]. Available from: www.mchk.org.hk/doctor/Specialist/39.pdf.

  46. Liang R. Planning for healthcare professionals in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Hospital Authority Convention 2005; Hong Kong; 2005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. K. H. Kwok.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwok, H.K.H., Szeto, G.P.Y., Cheng, A.S.K. et al. Occupational Rehabilitation in Hong Kong: Current Status and Future Needs. J Occup Rehabil 21 (Suppl 1), 28–34 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9286-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9286-4

Keywords

Navigation