Effectiveness of Health and Safety in Small Enterprises: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Evaluations of Interventions
- 611 Downloads
Introduction This systematic review was conducted to identify effective occupational health and safety interventions for small businesses. Methods The review focused on peer-reviewed intervention studies conducted in small businesses with 100 or fewer employees, that were published in English and several other languages, and that were not limited by publication date. Multidisciplinary members of the review team identified relevant articles and assessed their quality. Studies assessed as medium or high quality had data extracted, which was then synthesized. Results Five studies were deemed of medium or high quality, and proceeded to data extraction and evidence synthesis. The types of interventions identified: a combination of training and safety audits; and a combination of engineering, training, safety audits, and a motivational component, showed a limited amount of evidence in improving safety outcomes. Overall, this evidence synthesis found a moderate level of evidence for intervention effectiveness, and found no evidence that any intervention had adverse effects. Conclusions Even though there were few studies that adequately evaluated small business intervention, several studies demonstrate that well-designed evaluations are possible with small businesses. While stronger levels of evidence are required to make recommendations, these interventions noted above were associated with positive changes in safety-related attitudes and beliefs and workplace parties should be aware of them.
KeywordsSmall business Occupational safety Interventions Systematic review
The authors wish to thank: Lisa Brosseau for her expert advice; Kiera Keown and Anita Dubey for their editorial advice; and Shanti Raktoe for administrative support.
- 2.Stevens G. Workplace injuries in small and large manufacturing workplaces. Labour Market Trends 1999; (January):19–26.Google Scholar
- 3.Walters D. Health and safety in small enterprises: European strategies for managing improvement. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang; 2001.Google Scholar
- 4.Mendeloff J, Nelson C, Ko K, Haviland A. Small businesses and workplace fatality risk: an exploratory analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2006.Google Scholar
- 7.Lamm F, Walters D. Regulating occupational health and safety in small businesses. In: Bluff E, Gunningham N, Johnstone R, editors. OHS regulation for a changing world of work. Sydney: Federation Press; 2004. p. 94–119.Google Scholar
- 9.Eakin JM, Lamm F, Limborg HJ. International perspective on the promotion of health and safety in small workplaces. In: Frick K, Jensen PL, Quinlan M, Wilthagen T, editors. Systematic occupational health and safety management: perspectives on an international development. Amsterdam: Pergamon; 2000. p. 227–47.Google Scholar
- 10.Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009, [Handbook on the internet]. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
- 12.Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, MacEachen E, Frank J, Sinclair S, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative literature. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health; 2004.Google Scholar
- 13.Robson LS, Shannon HS, Goldenhar LM, Hale AR. Guide to evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing work injuries. How to show whether a safety intervention really works. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2001.Google Scholar
- 14.Snijders T, Bosker R. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.Google Scholar
- 20.Scherer RF, Daniel J. Complaint resolution by OSHA in small and large manufacturing firms. J Small Bus Manag. 1993;31:73–82.Google Scholar
- 22.Martyny JW, Buchan RM, Keefe TJ, Blehm KD. Impact of an OSHA onsite consultation program with an educational component on small businesses in Colorado. App Ind Hyg. 1988;3:12–5.Google Scholar
- 23.Baars S, Hafemann H, Kopsel H-J, Reinelt J. [Occupational-medical care in car repair shops in Lower Saxony] German. Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin. 2003;38:342–7.Google Scholar
- 28.Houston KM, Atkinson RG, Macdonald EB, O’Connor ME. A multi-disciplinary approach to assessing health promotion, occupational health and health & safety in the workplace. Int J Health Prom Educ. 1999;37:101–9.Google Scholar
- 29.Mayhew C, Young C. The impact of an intensive mailed OHS information campaign on small business cabinetmakers. J Occup Health Safety—Aust NZ. 1999;15:47–52.Google Scholar
- 30.Mayhew C, Ferris R. The impact of the legislative requirement for the completion of workplace health and safety plans on small-scale Queensland builders. J Occup Health Safety—Aust NZ. 1998;14:357–62.Google Scholar
- 31.Pearse W. Club zero: implementing OHSMS in small to medium fabricated metal product companies. J Occup Health Safety—Aust NZ. 2002;18:347–56.Google Scholar
- 33.Sheehy JW, Cooper TC, O’Brien DM. Control of asbestos exposure during brake drum service. App Ind Hyg. 1989;4:313–9.Google Scholar
- 34.Tuskes PM, Key MM. Potential hazards in small business: a gap in OSHA protection. App Ind Hyg. 1988;3:55–7.Google Scholar
- 35.Waugh R, Forcier L. Sense of sound. Australian deafness council project. J Occup Health Safety - Aust NZ. 1990;6:399–401.Google Scholar