Avoidable Sickness Absence in a Dutch Working Population
- 185 Downloads
Introduction Sickness absence has an important impact on employers (e.g. reduced productivity, high costs) and employees (e.g. replacement, job loss). Therefore, we investigated possible reduction by exploring avoidable sickness absence. Methods A questionnaire was filled out by 2,954 Dutch workers (internet panel of a marketing research company, 2005). We obtained data on self reported sickness absence (6.5 months), including the main reason for each sickness absence spell (4 health and 3 non-health reasons), self-reported work-relatedness of absence and workers’ opinion on whether their absence could have been shorter or prevented, and on 12 listed factors that might have contributed to sickness absence. For each of these factors we calculated the avoidable absence fraction (AAF), analogous to the epidemiological population attributable risk. Results A total of 1,233 workers reported sickness absence. The absence rate was 4.46%. For 11% of the absence rate health was not the main reason. Yet, when non-health was reported as the main reason for absence, health still contributed in half the cases. 35% of the absence rate was mainly work-related. 15% of the workers mentioned that their sickness absence could have been shorter or prevented. The AAFs of contributory factors were 0.129 for home related factors, 0.136 for work-related factors and 0.101 for (occupational) health care and guidance factors. In total, the AAF showed that 21.5% of the absence rate can be considered possibly avoidable. Conclusion According to the studied workers sickness absence rate can be reduced. In reducing the absence, one should not only consider factors from the home and work situation, but also from (occupational) health care.
KeywordsSickness absence Attributable fraction Workers’ opinion Health care
This study was funded by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports.
Competing Interests Statement
Both authors declare that they have contributed to the paper and that there are no financial or other relationships that might lead to a conflict of interest.
- 1.Houtman I. Health, chronic disease, absenteeism and work disability. Working hours and overtime. In: Smulders PGW, editor. Worklife in the Netherlands. Hoofddorp: TNO Work and Employment; 2006.Google Scholar
- 2.Central Bureau Statistics 2008. Available from http://statline.cbs.nl/statweb.
- 3.OECD. Sickness disability and work. Breaking the barriers. Denmark, Finland, Ireland and the Netherlands, vol. 3. OECD: Paris; 2008.Google Scholar
- 4.Huczynski AA, Fitzpatrick MJ. Managing employee absence for a competitive edge. London: Pitman; 1989.Google Scholar
- 5.Rhodes SR, Steers RM. Managing employee absenteeism. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1990.Google Scholar
- 7.Andrea H, Beurskens AJ, Metsemakers JF, van Amelsvoort LG, van den Brandt PA, van Schayck CP. Health problems and psychosocial work environment as predictors of long term sickness absence in employees who visited the occupational physician and/or general practitioner in relation to work: a prospective study. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:295–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. Epidemiological research. Principles and quantitative methods. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc.; 1982.Google Scholar
- 10.Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, Elovainio M, Lillrank B, Kevin MV. Death or illness of a family member, violence, interpersonal conflict, and financial difficulties as predictors of sickness absence: longitudinal cohort study on psychological and behaviorial links. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:817–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kunnen R, Praat WCM, Voogd-Hamelink AM, Wetzelfs CMMP. Trend report on supply of Labour (Trendrapport aanbod van arbeid 1997). The Hague: OSA; 1997.Google Scholar
- 14.Vroome EMM de, Smulders PGW, Vuuren CV van. Absence as the result of industrial risk and self-reported reasons for absence. Results of the National Investigation into Labour Conditions 2003. (Verzuim als gevolg van arbeidsrisico’s en zelf opgegeven verzuimredenen. Deelresultaten van Nationale Enquête Arbeidsomstandigheden 2003). Hoofddorp: TNO Work and Employment; 2005.Google Scholar
- 25.Van den Broek P, Streng R, van der Linden M. Synergy in the chain of care and social security: utopia or reality? (Synergie in de keten van zorg en sociale zekerheid: utopie of realiteit?). The Hague: Atos Consulting; 2008.Google Scholar