Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 81–89 | Cite as

Avoidable Sickness Absence in a Dutch Working Population

  • A. M. KremerEmail author
  • R. Steenbeek


Introduction Sickness absence has an important impact on employers (e.g. reduced productivity, high costs) and employees (e.g. replacement, job loss). Therefore, we investigated possible reduction by exploring avoidable sickness absence. Methods A questionnaire was filled out by 2,954 Dutch workers (internet panel of a marketing research company, 2005). We obtained data on self reported sickness absence (6.5 months), including the main reason for each sickness absence spell (4 health and 3 non-health reasons), self-reported work-relatedness of absence and workers’ opinion on whether their absence could have been shorter or prevented, and on 12 listed factors that might have contributed to sickness absence. For each of these factors we calculated the avoidable absence fraction (AAF), analogous to the epidemiological population attributable risk. Results A total of 1,233 workers reported sickness absence. The absence rate was 4.46%. For 11% of the absence rate health was not the main reason. Yet, when non-health was reported as the main reason for absence, health still contributed in half the cases. 35% of the absence rate was mainly work-related. 15% of the workers mentioned that their sickness absence could have been shorter or prevented. The AAFs of contributory factors were 0.129 for home related factors, 0.136 for work-related factors and 0.101 for (occupational) health care and guidance factors. In total, the AAF showed that 21.5% of the absence rate can be considered possibly avoidable. Conclusion According to the studied workers sickness absence rate can be reduced. In reducing the absence, one should not only consider factors from the home and work situation, but also from (occupational) health care.


Sickness absence Attributable fraction Workers’ opinion Health care 



This study was funded by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports.

Competing Interests Statement

Both authors declare that they have contributed to the paper and that there are no financial or other relationships that might lead to a conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Houtman I. Health, chronic disease, absenteeism and work disability. Working hours and overtime. In: Smulders PGW, editor. Worklife in the Netherlands. Hoofddorp: TNO Work and Employment; 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Central Bureau Statistics 2008. Available from
  3. 3.
    OECD. Sickness disability and work. Breaking the barriers. Denmark, Finland, Ireland and the Netherlands, vol. 3. OECD: Paris; 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huczynski AA, Fitzpatrick MJ. Managing employee absence for a competitive edge. London: Pitman; 1989.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rhodes SR, Steers RM. Managing employee absenteeism. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marmot M, Feeney A, Shipley M, North F, Syme SL. Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: From the UK Whitehall II study. J Epidem Comm Health. 1995;49:124–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andrea H, Beurskens AJ, Metsemakers JF, van Amelsvoort LG, van den Brandt PA, van Schayck CP. Health problems and psychosocial work environment as predictors of long term sickness absence in employees who visited the occupational physician and/or general practitioner in relation to work: a prospective study. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:295–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Allebeck P, Mastekaasa A. Swedish council on technology assessment in health care (SBU). Risk factors for sick leave-general studies. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;32:49–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. Epidemiological research. Principles and quantitative methods. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc.; 1982.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, Elovainio M, Lillrank B, Kevin MV. Death or illness of a family member, violence, interpersonal conflict, and financial difficulties as predictors of sickness absence: longitudinal cohort study on psychological and behaviorial links. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:817–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Voss M, Floderus B, Diderichsen F. How do job characteristics, family situation, domestic work, and lifestyle factors relate to sickness absence? A study based on Sweden post. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46:1134–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vahtera J, Kivimäki M, Penttti J. The role of extended weekends in sickness absenteeism. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58:818–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kunnen R, Praat WCM, Voogd-Hamelink AM, Wetzelfs CMMP. Trend report on supply of Labour (Trendrapport aanbod van arbeid 1997). The Hague: OSA; 1997.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vroome EMM de, Smulders PGW, Vuuren CV van. Absence as the result of industrial risk and self-reported reasons for absence. Results of the National Investigation into Labour Conditions 2003. (Verzuim als gevolg van arbeidsrisico’s en zelf opgegeven verzuimredenen. Deelresultaten van Nationale Enquête Arbeidsomstandigheden 2003). Hoofddorp: TNO Work and Employment; 2005.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jansen NWH, Kant IJ, Kristensen TS, Nijhuis FJN. Antecedents and consequences of work-family conflict: a prospective cohort study. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:479–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Hooff MLM, Geurts SAE, Taris TW, Kompier MAJ, Dikkers JSE, Houtman ILD, et al. Disentangling the causal relationships between work-home interference and employee health. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31:15–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jansen NWH, Kant IJ, Van Amelsvoort LGPM, Kristensen TS, Swaen GMH, Nijhuis FJN. Work-family conflict as a risk factor for sickness absence. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63:488–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nielsen ML, Rugulies R, Christensen KB, Smith-Hansen L, Kristensen TS. Psychosocial work environment predictors of short and long spells of registered sickness absence during a 2-year follow up. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:591–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lidwall U, Marklund S. What is healthy work for women and men? A case–control study of gender and sector specific effects of psychosocial working conditions in long-term sickness absence. Work. 2006;27:153–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Anema JR, Van Der Giezen AM, Buijs PC, Van Mechelen W. Ineffective disability management by doctors is an obstacle for return-to-work: a cohort study on low back pain patients sicklisted for 3–4 months. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:729–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anema JR, Jettinghoff K, Houtman I, Schoemaker C, Buijs PC, van den Berg R. Medical care of employees long-term sick listed due to mental health problems: a cohort study to describe and compare the care of the OP and GP. J Occup Rehab. 2006;16:41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buijs PC, van Dijk FJH, Evers M, van der Klink JJL, Anema JR. Managing work-related psychological complaints by GPs, in coordination with OPs: developing and testing a guideline. Ind Health. 2007;45:37–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grinyer A, Singleton V. Sickness absence as risk-taking behaviour: a study of organisational and cultural factors in the public sector. Health, Risk & Society. 2000;2:7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aronsson G, Gustafsson K, Dallner M. Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:502–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van den Broek P, Streng R, van der Linden M. Synergy in the chain of care and social security: utopia or reality? (Synergie in de keten van zorg en sociale zekerheid: utopie of realiteit?). The Hague: Atos Consulting; 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TNO Work and EmploymentHoofddorpThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations