Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The psychology of injured workers: Health and cost of vocational rehabilitation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: In the vocational rehabilitation of injured workers the influence of the worker's personality has been neglected. This is despite there being substantial evidence that in chronic pain certain personality factors are significantly related to poorer outcomes. This is a preliminary study that has examined the relationship between personality factors, personality psychopathology and rehabilitation outcomes in injured workers. Method: Data from structured clinical interviews, self report and rehabilitation outcome (cost) were gathered from 36 injured workers with recognized compensation claims for physical and/or psychological workplace injury. Results: Personality factors were associated with poorer outcome, particularly cost and health. Individuals with extreme personality traits experienced poorer health and vocational rehabilitation outcomes. The combination of high Neuroticism and low Extraversion which is a pattern often characterized as anxious and socially avoidant was found to be consistently related to poor health outcomes. Conclusions: The results indicate that considering the type of personality characteristics of injured workers may have important theoretical and practical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Occupational Health and Safety Commission. 380 New workers compensation claims daily. Canberra: Australian Government; 15 January 2004. 1 p.

  2. The Royal Australasian College of Physicians HPU. Compensible injuries and health outcomes. Sydney: The Royal Australasian College of Physicians; 2001. 40 p.

  3. Strunin L, Boden LI. The workers' compensation system: worker friend or foe? Am J Ind Med 2004; 45:338–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caspi A, Moffitt TE. When do individual differences matter? A paradoxical theory of personality coherence. Psychol Inq 1993;4(4):247–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams D. Disabled workers: Personality, organisational, and treatment factors. Acad Organisational Occup Psychiatry Bull Arch 1997;6(2):10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gaffney K. 26 May 1997. Understanding the injured worker: Psychology's role in workers compensation. Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority .http:healthpsych.com.cciahtml. Accessed 26 May 2002.

  7. Cole-King A, Harding KG. Psychological factors and delayed healing in chronic wounds. Psychosom Med 2001;63:216–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McCracken LM, Gatchel R. The magnification of psychopathology sequalae associated with multiple chronic medical conditions. J Appl Biobehav Res 2000;(1):92–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Psychological issues and treatments for people with diabetes. J Clin Psychol 2001;57(4):457–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barsky AJ, Borus JF. Functional somatic syndromes. Ann Int Med 1999;130:910–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman JA. The workers' compensation patient: A paradoxical cognitive-behavioural approach to rehabilitation. Curr Pain Headache Rep 1998;2:11–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sullivan MJ, Feuerstein M, Gatchel R, Linton SJ, Pransky G. Integrating psychosocal and behavioural interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):475–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders IV. Washington, DC: Author; 1994.

  14. Widiger TA. Personality disorders. In: Antony MM, Barlow DH, editors. Handbook of assessment and treatment planning for psychological disorders. New York: The Guilford Press; 2002. p 453–480.

  15. Freeman A. Preface. In: Sperry L, editor. Cognitive Behavior Therapy of DSM-IV Personality Disorders: Highly effective interventions for the most common personality disorders. Phillidelphia: Bunner/Mazel; 1999. p ix–xii.

  16. Sperry L. Cognitive behavior therapy of DSM-IV personality disorders: Highly effective interventions for the most common personality disorders. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel; 1999. p 201.

    Google Scholar 

  17. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders IV-TR. Washington, DC: Author; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Trull TJ, Durrett CA. Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 2005;1:355–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Livesley JW. Conceptual and taxonomic issues. In: Livesley JW, editor. Handbook of Personality Disorders:Theory, Research, and Treatment. New York: The Guilford Press; 2001 p 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Costa PT, Jr, McCrae RR. The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Malouff J, Thorsteinnsson E, Schutte N. The relationship between the five-factor model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: a meta-analysis. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2005;27(2):101–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bienvenu OJ, Samuels JF, Costa PT, Jr, Reti IM, Eaton WW, Nestadt G. Anxiety and depressive disorders and the five-factor model of personality: A higher and lower-order personality trait investigation in a community sample. Depress Anxiety 2004;20:92–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Os J, Park BG, Jones PB. Neuroticism, life events and mental health: evidence for person-environment correlation. Br J Psychiatry 2001;178(suppl. 40):s72–s77.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Costa PT, Jr, McCrae RR. NEO PI-R Professional Manual: Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) ande NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 1992. p 101.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cotton P. Challenges in the assessment and management of work stress. 2002; Sydney. LexisNexis Butterworths.

  26. First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. User's guide for the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis II personality disorders: SCID-II. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc; 1997. p 89.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maffei C, Fossati A, Agostoni I, Barraco A, Bagnato M, Deborah D, Namia C, Novella L, Petrachi M. Interrater reliability and internal consitency of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (SCID-II), version 2.0. J Personality Disorder 1997;11(3):279–284.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hueston WJ, Mainous AG, Schilling R. Patients with personality disorders: Functional status, health care utilisation, and satisfaction with care. J Fam Practice 1996;42:54–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jones S, Thornicroft G, Coffey M, Dunn G. A brief mental health outcome scale-reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Br J Psychiatry 1995;166:654–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hilsenroth M, Ackerman S, Blagys M, Baumann B, Baity M, Smith S, Price J, Smith C, Heindselman T, Mount M and others. Reliability and validity of DSM-IV axis V. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157(November):1858–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the general health questionnaire. Psychol Med 1979;24:18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Goldberg DP, Williams P. A user's guide to the general health questionnaire:GHQ. Berkshire: NferNelson; 1988. p 129.

    Google Scholar 

  33. SPSS. SPSS Graduate Pack. 14.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2005.

  34. Reich J, Thompson D. DSM-III personality clusters in three popluations. Br J Psychiatry 1987;150:471–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kinney R-K, Gatchel R, Polatin P-B, Fogarty W-T, Mayer T. Prevalence of psychopathology in acute and chronic low back pain patients. J Occup Rehabil 1993;3(2):95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Skodol AE, Gunderson JG, McGlashan TH, Dyck IR, Stout RL, Bender DS, Grilo CM, Shea MT, Zanarini M, Morey LC and others. Functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159(2):276–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support of CRSAustralia, Total Health&Rehab, Advanced Personnel Management (APM), and Northern Territory Rehabilitation Service. We recognize Dr Mary Morris, Charles Darwin University for her preliminary contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

    Cindy L. Wall & James R. P. Ogloff

  2. Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health (Forensicare), Melbourne, Australia

    James R. P. Ogloff

  3. School of Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia

    Shirley A. Morrissey

Authors
  1. Cindy L. Wall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James R. P. Ogloff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shirley A. Morrissey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy L. Wall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wall, C.L., Ogloff, J.R.P. & Morrissey, S.A. The psychology of injured workers: Health and cost of vocational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 16, 513–528 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9051-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9051-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation