Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Safe Lifting in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparing FCE Lifting Task and Niosh Lifting Guideline

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Introduction: Both the floor-to-waist lifting task of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation (IWS FCE) and recommended weight limit (RWL) of the NIOSH produce safe lifting weights and are used world-wide nowadays. It is unknown whether they produce similar safe lifting weights. Aim of this study was to compare FCE performance on the floor-to-waist lifting task and RWL of the NIOSH lifting guideline for this task, in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods: Ninety-two patients performed the FCE lifting task. RWL was calculated for this task. Performance was compared with RWL. A lifting index was calculated by dividing performance by RWL. Differences between groups with a lifting index ≤1, 1–3, and >3 were calculated for pain intensity, scores on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and work status. Results: Men lifted on average 32.5 kg (SD 15.4) and women 18.8 kg (SD 7.8). RWL for this task was 12.8 kg. Mean difference between performance and RWL was 15.0 kg (SD 14.7; range −8.8 to 59.2). The Roland Morris Disability score of patients with a lifting index ≤1 was significantly lower than patients with a lifting index 1–3 and >3. No difference in pain intensity and work status was found between groups. Conclusion: It was concluded that performance on the FCE floor-to-waist lifting task and RWL of the NIOSH for this task produce different safe lifting weights in individual patients with CLBP, which may result in contradictory recommendations about need for rehabilitation and return to work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MNM, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for low back pain: A systematic review. Scan J Work Environ Health 1999; 25: 387–403.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, de Vet HCW, Douwes M, Koes BW, Miedema MC, Ariens GAM, Bouter LM. Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are risk factors for low back pain: Results of a prospective cohort study. Spine 2000; 25: 3087–3092.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, de Vet HCW, Ariens GAM, van Mechelen W, Bouter LM. High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: Results of a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2002; 59: 323–328.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reneman MF, Wittink H. Functional performance evaluation. In: Nordin M, Pope M, Andersson M, eds. Musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace II—the prevention of disability. 2005.

  5. Duluth, MN. Isernhagen Work Systems. Functional capacity procedure manual, 1997.

  6. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A. Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. Cincinnati, Ohio: DHHS (NIOSH) publication, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones T, Kumar S. Functional capacity evaluation of manual materials handlers: A review. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 179–191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. King PM, Tuckwell N, Barrett TE. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 852–866.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marras W, Fine LJ, Ferguson S, Waters TR. The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low back disorders. Ergonomics 1999; 229–245.

  10. Waters TR, Baron SL, Piacitelli LA, Putz-Anderson V, Skov T, Haring-Sweeney M, Wall DK, Fine LJ. Evaluation of the revised NIOSH lifting equation. A cross-sectional epidemiologic study. Spine 1999; 24: 386–394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press Inc, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Innes E, Straker L. Validity of work-related assessments. Work 1999; 13: 125–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JMH, Göeken LNH. Test–retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13: 207–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gross DP, Battie MC. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 364–371.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Göeken LNH. Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil 2002; 12: 269–275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JMH, Göeken LNH. Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance based disability measurements in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2002; 12: 119–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Dijkstra SJ, Dijkstra PU. The relationship between kinesiophobia and performance in a functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13: 277–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fishbain DA, Cutler R, Rosomoff HL, Tarek K, Abdel-Moty E, Steele-Rosomoff RRN. Validity of the dictionary of occupational titles residual functional capacity battery. Clin J Pain 1999; 15: 102–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gross DP, Battie MC. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: Part 2. Sustained recovery. Spine 2004; 29: 920–924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gross DP, Battie MC. Predicting timely recovery and recurrence following multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients With Compensated Low Back Pain. Spine 2005; 30: 235–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gross D, Battie MC, Cassidy J. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluations in patients with chronic low back pain: Part 1. Timely return to work. Spine 2004; 29: 914–919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Matheson L, Isernhagen S, Hart D. Relationships among lifting ability, grip force, and return to work. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 249–256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Elfeituri FE, Taboun SM. An evaluation of the NIOSH lifting equation: A psychophysical and biomechanical investigation. Int J Occup Saf Health 2002; 8: 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kuijer W, Brouwer S, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JHB, Dijkstra PU. Work status and chronic low back pain. Exploring the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28 (6): in press.

  25. Sesek R, Gilkey D, Drinkaus P, Bloswick DS, Herron R. Evaluation and quantification of manual materials handling risk factors. Int J Occup Saf Ergonomics 2003; 9: 271–287.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bolton JE. Accuracy of recall of usual pain intensity in back pain patients. Pain 1999; 83: 533–539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Love MA, Leboeuf DC, Crisp TC. Chiropractic chronic low back pain sufferers and self-report assessment methods: Part 1. A reliability study of the visual analogue scale, the pain drawing and the McGill pain questionnaire. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1989; 12: 21–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983; 17: 45–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ, van der Heijden GJ, Knipschild PG. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Spine 1995; 20: 1017–1028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain. A comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996; 65: 71–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brouwer S, Kuijer W, Dijkstra PU, Goeken LNH, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JHB. Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: Intra class correlation and limits of agreement. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 162–165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vet HC, Bouter LM, Bezemer PM. Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001; 17: 479–487.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gommans IHB, Koes BW, van Tulder MW. Validiteit en responsiviteit Nederlandstalige Roland Disability Questionnaire. Vragenlijst naar functionele status bij patiënten met chronische lage rugpijn. Ned Tijdschr Fys 1997; 107: 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kuijer W, Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Jorritsma W, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JHB. Responsiveness of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: Consequences of using different external criteria. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 488–495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Van Houdenhove B, Neerinckx E. De ziel uit het lijf. Verhoogt een overactieve levensstijl de vatbaarheid voor het chronische-vermoeidheidssyndroom? Tijdschr Psych [J Psychiatry] 1998; 40: 212–220.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vlaeyen JWS, Morley S. Active despite pain: The putative role of stop-rules and current mood. Pain 2004; 110: 512–516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Arntz A, Peters M. Chronic low back pain and inaccurate predictions of pain: Is being too tough a risk factor for the development and maintenance of chronic pain? Behav Res Ther 1995; 33: 49–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hasenbring M. Attentional control of pain and the process of chronification. In: Sandkuhler J, Bromm B, Gebhart GF, eds. Progress in Brain Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science b.v., 2000; pp. 525–534.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Morley S, Eccleston C. The object of fear in pain. In: Asmundson GJ, Vlaeyen JWS, Crombez G, eds. Understanding and treating fear of pain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 163–188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The data of this study was collected as part of the low back pain and disability (LOBADIS) research program, supported by grants of “Zorgonderzoek Nederland,” number 96-06-006, and by gifts of the Foundation “Beatrixoord Noord Nederland” and the Foundation “De Drie Lichten,” the Netherlands.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Wietske Kuijer, Pieter U. Dijkstra, Sandra Brouwer, Michiel F. Reneman & Jan H. B. Geertzen

  2. Northern Center for Health Care Research, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Wietske Kuijer, Pieter U. Dijkstra, Sandra Brouwer, Johan W. Groothoff & Jan H. B. Geertzen

  3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Pieter U. Dijkstra

  4. Center for Work and Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Michiel F. Reneman

  5. Freulepark 12 7207 KD, Zutphen, The Netherlands

    Wietske Kuijer

Authors
  1. Wietske Kuijer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pieter U. Dijkstra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sandra Brouwer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michiel F. Reneman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Johan W. Groothoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jan H. B. Geertzen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wietske Kuijer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuijer, W., Dijkstra, P.U., Brouwer, S. et al. Safe Lifting in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparing FCE Lifting Task and Niosh Lifting Guideline. J Occup Rehabil 16, 579–589 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-9010-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-9010-3

Key Words

Search

Navigation