Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 459–474 | Cite as

Prognosis and the Identification of Workers Risking Disability: Research Issues and Directions for Future Research

  • Steven J. Linton
  • Doug Gross
  • Izabela Z. Schultz
  • Chris Main
  • Pierre Côté
  • Glenn Pransky
  • William Johnson


Introduction: Screening procedures based on prognostic data are an important prerequisite for prevention of disability due to low-back pain. This paper reviews the research on prognosis to delineate the most pertinent research challenges, and outlines directions for future research to improve the scientific quality and screening accuracy of prognostic efforts. Methods: Reviews of prognosis research were examined to identify key methodological and research issues. Results: Certain issues such as sampling procedures, research designs, data analyses, prognostic indicators, and follow-up procedures limit the value of prior studies. Absence of a clear conceptual framework hampers interpretation of findings and moving research questions forward. The recurrent nature of back pain and the need to effectively include the impact of employer actions and the job market were also identified as significant issues. Conclusions: Future research will be enhanced by addressing conceptual and definitional issues, applying tested and sensible measures, and careful follow-up of the study population.

Key Words

screening disability conceptual models methodology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Reid S, Haugh LD, Hazard RG, Tripathi M. Occupational low back pain: Recovery curves and factors associated with disability. J Occup Rehab 1997; 7: 1–14.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nachemson A, Jonsson E, eds. Neck and back pain: The scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000, p. 495.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Waddell G, Aylward M, Sawney P. Back pain, incapacity for work and social security benefits: An international literature review and analysis. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pransky G, Gatchel RJ, Linton SJ, Loisel P. Improving return to work research. J Occup Rehab 2005; 15: 453–457.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crook J, Milner R, Schultz IZ, Stringer B. Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: A critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehab 2002; 12: 277–295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, de Vet HC, Ariëns GAM, van Mechelen W, Bouter LM. High physical load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: Results of a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2002; 59: 323–328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Linton SJ, van Tulder MW. Preventive interventions for back and neck pain. In: Nachemson A, Jonsson E, eds. Neck and back pain: The scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000, pp. 127–147.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Linton SJ. Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: A systematic review. J Occup Rehab 2001; 11: 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McIntosh G, Frank J, Hogg-Johnson S, Hall H, Bombardier C. Prognostic factors for time claimants receive worker's compensation benefits in a cohort of patients with low back pain. Spine 2000; 25: 147–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pengel LHM, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Refsauge KM. Acute low back pain: Systematic review of its prognosis. BMJ 2003; 327: 323–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pincus T, Morely SJ. Cognitive appraisal. In: Linton SJ, ed. New avenues for the prevention of chronic musculskeletal pain and disability. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2002, pp. 123–141.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shaw WS, Pransky G, Fitzgerald TE. Early prognosis for low back disability: Intervention strategies for health care providers. Disab Rehab 2001; 23: 815–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valat JP, Goupille P, Vedere V. Low back pain: Risk factors for chronicity. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1997; 64: 189–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ. Screening to identify people at risk of long-term incapacity for work: A conceptual and scientific review. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wasiak R, Pransky G, Verma S, Webster B. Recurrence of low back pain: Definition-sensitivity analysis using administrative data. Spine 2003; 28: 2283–2291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Turk DC. Biopsychosocial perspective on chronic pain. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC, eds. Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner's handbook, 1st edn., Vol. 1. New York: Guilford Press, 1996, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turk DC, Gatchel RJ, eds. Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner's handbook, Vol. 2. New York: Guilford Press, 2002, p. 590.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schultz IZ, Crook J, Fraser K, Joy P. Models of diagnosis and rehabilitation in pain-related occupational disability. J Occup Rehab 2000; 10: 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hurley D, Dusoir T, McDonough S, Moore A, Baxter G. How effective is the acute low back pain screening questionnaire for predicting 1-year follow-up in patients with low back pain? Clin J Pain 2001; 17: 256–263.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feuerstein M, Huang GD, Haufler AJ, Miller JK. Development of a screen for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with work-related upper extremity disorders. JOEM 2000; 42: 749–761.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boersma K, Linton SJ. Screening to identify patients at risk: Profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention. Clin J Pain 2005; 21: 38–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA. Validation of the Gail et al. Model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 358–366.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kattan MW, Giri D, Panageas KS, Hummer A, Cranor M, Van Zee KJ. A tool for predicting breast carcinoma mortality in women who do not receive adjuvant therapy. Cancer 2004; 101: 2509–2515.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Valgimigli M, Ceconi C, Malagutti P, Merli E, Soukhomovskaia O, Francolini G. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor 1 is a major predictor of mortality and new-onset heart failure in patients with acute myocardial infarction: The cytokine-activation and long-term prognosis in myocardial infarction (c-alpha) study. Circulation 2005; 111: 863–870.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Voutilainen PE, Siironen P, Franssila KO, Sivula A, Haapiainen RK, Haglund CH. AMES, MACIS and TNM prognostic classifications in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Anticancer Res 2003; 23: 4283–4288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Robson J, Boomla K, Hart B, Feder G. Estimating cardiovascular risk for primary prevention: Outstanding questions for primary care. BMJ 2000; 320: 702–704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Gardea CN, Pulliam M. Treatment and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: A one-year prospective study. J Occup Rehab 2003; 13: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Garofalo JP, Gatchel RJ, Kishino N, Strizak AM. An early screening and intervention model for acute and subacute low back pain. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, eds. Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention and prevention. New York: Springer, 2005, pp. 489–501.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Loisel P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, et al. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: A six year follow up study. Occup Environ Med 2002; 59: 807–815.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sullivan MJL, Gatchel RJ, Feuerstein M, Linton SJ, Pransky G. Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehab 2005; 15: 475–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Groth-Marnat G, ed. Handbook of psychological assessment, 4th edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2003.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lanyon RI, Goodstein LD, eds. Personality assessment, 3rd edn. New York: Wiley, 1997.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dawes RM, Faust D, Meehl PE. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 1989; 243: 1668–1674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Garb HN. Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1998.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Groth-Marnat G. Visions of clinical assessment: Then, now, and a brief history of the future. J Clin Psychol 2000; 56: 349–365.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kendall NAS, Linton SJ, Main C. Psychosocial yellow flags for acute low back pain: “Yellow flags” as an analogue to “red flags.” Eur J Pain 1998; 2: 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Main CJ, Spanswick CC. Pain management: An interdisciplinary approach. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Main CJ, Phillips CJ, Watson PJ. Secondary prevention in health care and occupational settings in musculoskeletal conditions focusing on low back pain. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, eds. Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention and prevention. New York: Springer, 2005, pp. 387–404.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Butler RJ, Worrall JD. Work injury compensation and the duration of nonwork spells. Econom J 2001; 379: 714–724.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baldwin ML, Côté P, Frank JW, Johnson WG. Cost-effectiveness studies of medical and chiropractic care for occupational back pain: A critical review of the literature. Spine J 2001; 1: 138–147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Burkhauser RV, Wittenburg DC. How current disability transfer policies discourage work: Analysis from the 1990 sipp. J Voc Rehab 1996; 7: 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Krause N, Dsinger LK, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: A review of the literature. J Occup Rehab 1998; 8: 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied survival analysis: Regression modeling of time to event data. New York: Wiley, 1999.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Frank JW, Brooker AS, DeMaio SE, Kerr MS, Maetzel A, Shannon HS, Sullivan TJ, Norman RW, Wells RP. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain: Part II: What do we know about secondary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins. Spine 1996; 21: 2918– 2929.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999; 354: 581–585.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Alternative approaches for measuring duration of work disability after low back injury based on administrative workers’ compensation data. Am J Ind Med 1999; 35: 604–618.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Baldwin ML, Johnson WJ, Butler RJ. The error of using returns-to-work to measure the outcome of health care. Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 632–641.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gross DP, Battie MC. Predicting timely recovery and recurrence following multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with compensated low back pain. Spine 2005; 30: 235–240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kleinbaum DG. Survival analysis: A self-learning text. New York: Springer, 1996.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 714–724.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Altman DG, Lyman GH. Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1998; 52: 289–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Côté P, Berglund A, Nygren {Å}L. Population-based, inception cohort study of traffic injuries in Saskatchewan: An analysis of post-traumatic low back pain. Spine 2003; 28: 1002– 1009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cote P, Baldwin M, Frank J, Johnson W. The course of back pain in workers: Time to take another look beyond the first return-to-work! Institute for Work and Health, 2005. Working paper # 302.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Frank JW, Bombardier C. A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature. Spine 2001; 26: E445–E448.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Deyo RA. Pain and public policy. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1211–1213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Côté P, Hogg-Johnson S, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Frank JW. The association between neck pain intensity, physical functioning, depressive symptomatology and claim duration after whiplash. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 275–286.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Greenland S. Introduction to regression methods. In: Rothman K, Greenland S, eds. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Raven, 1998, pp. 359–399.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kristman V, Manno M, Côté P. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: How much is too much? Eur J Epidemiol 2004; 19: 751–760.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Savitz DA. Selection bias in cohort studies. In: Interpreting epidemiologic evidence: Strategies for design and analysis. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 51–80.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Linton SJ, ed. New avenues for the prevention of chronic musculoskeletal pain and disability, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2002, p. 306.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Westgaard RH, Winkel J. On occupational ergonomic risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders and related intervention practice. In: Linton SJ, ed. New avenues for the prevention of chronic musculoskeletal pain and disability, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2002, pp. 143–164.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Von Korff M, Balderson BHK, Saunders K, Miglioretti DL, Lin EHB, Berry S, Moore JE, Turner JA. A trial of an activating intervention for chronic back pain in primary care and physical therapy settings. Pain 2005; 113: 323–330.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Linton SJ, Boersma K, Jansson M, Svärd L, Botvalde M. The effects of cognitive-behavioral and physical therapy preventive interventions on pain related sick leave: A randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain 2005; 21: 109–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sullivan MJL, Stanish WD. Psychologically based occupational rehabilitation: The pain-disability prevention program. Clin J Pain 2003; 19: 97–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Burton AK, Eriksen HR, Leclarc A, Balagué F, Henrotin Y, Müller G, Cardon G, Lahad A, van der Beek AJ. European guidelines for prevention in low back pain. European Union: COST B13, s., 2004.
  66. 66.
    Schultz I, Crook J, Milner R, Berkowitz J, Meloche G. Use of administrative databases for the multivariate prediction of occupational disability: A feasibility assessment. J Workers Comp 2002; 12: 43–55.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Loisel P, Durand M. Working with the employer: The Sherbrooke model. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, eds. Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention and prevention. New York: Springer, 2005.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Krause N, Frank JW, Sullivan TJ, Dasinger LK, Sinclair SJ. Determinants of duration of disability and return to work after work-related injury and illness: Challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med 2001; 40: 464–484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ. Where are we now and where are we heading? Research and practice directions in risk for disability prediction and early intervention. In: Schultz IA, Gatchel RJ, eds. Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention and prevention. New York: Springer, 2005, pp. 387–404.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven J. Linton
    • 1
  • Doug Gross
    • 2
  • Izabela Z. Schultz
    • 3
  • Chris Main
    • 4
  • Pierre Côté
    • 5
  • Glenn Pransky
    • 6
  • William Johnson
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral, Social and Legal Sciences—PsychologyÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
  2. 2.Department of Physical TherapyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology and Special EducationUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Calderbank Research UnitUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUnited Kingdom
  5. 5.Institute for Work and HealthTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Center for Disability ResearchLiberty Mutual Research Institute for SafetyHopkinton
  7. 7.School of Health Management and PolicyArizona State UniversityTempe

Personalised recommendations