Training the Next Generation of Researchers in Work Disability Prevention: The Canadian Work Disability Prevention CIHR Strategic Training Program
- 124 Downloads
Introduction: There is a need to create, disseminate, and implement new knowledge in the work disability prevention (WDP) field. Training programs attracting high-quality applicants and taking into account the complexity of this emerging field are urgently needed. Methods: An advanced training program, funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), was developed by 24 mentors affiliated with nine different universities. The main objective of this program is to develop transdisciplinary knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding WDP. This program has been developed for PhD students or post-doctoral fellows already registered full-time in a Canadian or recognized foreign university whose main interest is WDP, regardless of the health problem. Results: Since its implementation, the program received two successive cohorts of 10 students. They were registered in 13 universities in five countries and trained in nine different disciplines. Conclusions and significances: Appropriate WDP research may save major societal costs attributable to prolonged work disability. The proposed training program will contribute to developing tomorrow’s research workforce.
Keywordstransdisciplinarity graduate training program work disability prevention
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Limoges J. Pourquoi travailler? In: Limoges J, Lemaire R, and Dodier F, ed. Trouver son travail. Montréal: CIM Fides, 1987, pp. 13–27.Google Scholar
- 2.Baril R, Martin JC, Lapointe C, Massicotte P. Éetude exploratoire des processus de réeinsertion sociale et professionnelle des travailleurs en réeadaptation. Montréeal: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvée en santée et séecuritée du travail (IRSST), 1994.Google Scholar
- 3.Spitzer WO, LeBlanc FE, Dupuis M. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine 1987; 12: 51–59.Google Scholar
- 4.Waddell G. The back pain revolution. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.Google Scholar
- 5.Health Canada. Economic burden of illness in Canada 1998. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada, 2002.Google Scholar
- 7.Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, Vézina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, Larivière C, Tremblay C. Disability prevention—New paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manag Health Outcomes 2001; 9: 351–360.Google Scholar
- 10.Frank JW, Brooker A, DeMaio SE, Kerr MS, Maetzel A, Shannon HS, Sullivan TJ, Norman RW, Wells RP. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part II: What do we know about secondary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins. Spine 1996; 21: 2918–2929.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Waddell G, Aylward M, Swawney P. Back pain, incapacity for work and social security benefits: An international literature review and analysis. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd, 2002.Google Scholar
- 14.Dobren AA. An ecologically oriented conceptual model of vocational rehabilitation of people with acquired midcareer disabilities. Rehabil Couns Bull 1994; 37: 215–228.Google Scholar
- 15.Parker RM, Szymanski EM, Hanley-Maxell C. Ecological assessment in supported employment. J Appl Rehabil Couns 1989; 20: 26–33.Google Scholar
- 16.Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
- 18.Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Clinical Practice Guideline: Acute low back problems in adults. US Department of Health and Human Services: Rockville, 1994.Google Scholar
- 19.Dutch Society of Occupational Physicians, Practice guidelines for low back pain, 1999.Google Scholar
- 21.de Freitas L, Morin E, Nicolescu B, Charter of Transdisciplinarity. 1994, International Center for Transdisciplinary Research, http://nicol.club.fr/ciret/english/charten.htm.
- 22.Peterson’s Annual Guides to Graduate Study. Graduate programs in Business, Education, Health, Information Studies, Law and Social Work (book 6). 35 ed, 2001.Google Scholar
- 23.Commonwealth Universities Yearbook 2000. A directory to the Universities of the Commonwealth and the Handbook of their Association. London: John Foster House, 2000.Google Scholar
- 24.Annulaire national des universités. Conférence des préesidents d’!université. France: L’Étudiant, 2001.Google Scholar
- 25.Lasnier F. Réeussir la formation par compétences. Montréal: Éditions Guéerin, 2000.Google Scholar
- 26.Henri F, Lundgren-Cayrol K. Apprentissage collaboratif à distance: pour comprendre et concevoir les environnements d’apprentissage virtuels. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec, 2001.Google Scholar
- 27.Wilkerson L, Gijselaers WH. Bringing Problem-Based Learning to Higher Education: Theory and Practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1996.Google Scholar
- 28.Palloff RM, Pratt K. Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace. Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar
- 29.Université de Sherbrooke, Politique 2500-007. Évaluation périodique des programmes. 2001, Université de Sherbrooke, http://www.usherbrooke.ca/accueil/documents/politiques/2500-007.pdf.