Skip to main content

Effect of Formulation and Pressure on Injection Moulded Soy Protein-Based Plastics

Journal of Polymers and the Environment volume 29, pages 2789–2796 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

The replacement of plastic materials derived from petroleum derivatives by highly biodegradable materials has been pursued to counteract the global environmental damage caused by their accumulated landfilling. In this sense, the feasibility of a soy protein isolate (SPI) to obtain processed materials has been extensively documented. In the present study, the characterization of injection moulded soy protein-based materials with different SPI/glycerol ratios (50/50, 55/45 and 60/40) has been carried out for different processing conditions of pressure (250, 500, 1000 bar) and temperature (80, 100, 120 °C). This characterization was performed in terms of their viscoelastic and tensile properties, water uptake capacity and soluble mater loss. An increase on the mechanical and viscoelastic properties was denoted when the protein content was higher, which could be related to an enhancement of interactions due to a greater proximity between chains. Similar effects were observed when the injection pressure was increased, eventually achieving a remarkable elongation at break value of 2, 7500% when processed at 1000 bar. Moreover, mould temperature was detected to be the most influential parameter on their water uptake capacity, resulting in a hindering of these parameter as higher temperatures were used. The effect of pressure on water uptake of these materials was opposite and milder to that found for temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Data Availability

The processed data necessary to reproduce these results should be required to the corresponding author who could supply them.

References

  1. Hussain J, Khan A, Zhou K (2020) The impact of natural resource depletion on energy use and CO2 emission in Belt & Road Initiative countries: a cross-country analysis. Energy 199:117409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar VV, Hoadley A, Shastri Y (2019) Dynamic impact assessment of resource depletion: a case study of natural gas in New Zealand. Sustain Prod Consum 18:165–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meys R, Frick F, Westhues S, Sternberg A, Klankermayer J, Bardow A (2020) Towards a circular economy for plastic packaging wastes—the environmental potential of chemical recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 162:105010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mejame PPM, Jung D-Y, Lee H, Lee DS, Lim S-R (2020) Effect of technological developments for smartphone lithium battery on metal-derived resource depletion and toxicity potentials. Resour Conserv Recycl 158:104797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhola V, Swalaha F, RanjithKumar R, Singh M, Bux F (2014) Overview of the potential of microalgae for CO2 sequestration. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11(7):2103–2118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0487-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsang YF et al (2019) Production of bioplastic through food waste valorization. Environ Int 127:625–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2019.03.076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernández-Espada L, Bengoechea C, Cordobés F, Guerrero A (2016) Protein/glycerol blends and injection-molded bioplastic matrices: soybean versus egg albumen. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.42980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Álvarez-Castillo E, Bengoechea C, Rodríguez N, Guerrero A (2019) Development of green superabsorbent materials from a by-product of the meat industry. J Clean Prod 223:651–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Félix M et al (2014) Development of albumen/soy biobased plastic materials processed by injection molding. J Food Eng 125:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.10.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thiruchelvi R, Das A, Sikdar E (2020) Bioplastics as better alternative to petro plastic. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gadhave RV, Das A, Mahanwar PA, Gadekar PT (2018) Starch based bio-plastics: the future of sustainable packaging. Open J Polym Chem 08(02):21–33. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpchem.2018.82003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Garavand F, Rouhi M, Razavi SH, Cacciotti I, Mohammadi R (2017) Improving the integrity of natural biopolymer films used in food packaging by crosslinking approach: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 104:687–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Capezza AJ, Newson WR, Olsson RT, Hedenqvist MS, Johansson E (2019) Advances in the use of protein-based materials: toward sustainable naturally sourced absorbent materials. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(5):4532–4547. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Das O et al (2019) An all-gluten biocomposite: comparisons with carbon black and pine char composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Capezza AJ et al (2019) Novel sustainable superabsorbents: a one-pot method for functionalization of side-stream potato proteins. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(21):17845–17854. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cuadri AA, Bengoechea C, Romero A, Guerrero A (2016) A natural-based polymeric hydrogel based on functionalized soy protein. Eur Polym J 85:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.10.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Perez-Puyana V, Felix M, Romero A, Guerrero A (2016) Effect of the injection moulding processing conditions on the development of pea protein-based bioplastics. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kwak HW, Lee H, Park S, Lee ME, Jin H-J (2020) Chemical and physical reinforcement of hydrophilic gelatin film with di-aldehyde nanocellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 146:332–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Álvarez-Castillo E, Bengoechea C, Guerrero A (2020) Effect of pH on the properties of porcine plasma-based superabsorbent materials. Polym Test 85:106453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Félix M, Lucio-Villegas A, Romero A, Guerrero A (2016) Development of rice protein bio-based plastic materials processed by injection molding. Ind Crops Prod 79:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ali A, Ahmed S (2018) Recent advances in edible polymer based hydrogels as a sustainable alternative to conventional polymers. J Agric Food Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bashari A, Rouhani Shirvan A, Shakeri M (2018) Cellulose-based hydrogels for personal care products. Polym Adv Technol. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fernández-Espada L, Bengoechea C, Sandía JAA, Cordobés F, Guerrero A (2019) Development of novel soy-protein-based superabsorbent matrixes through the addition of salts. J Appl Polym Sci 136(5):47012. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.47012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cuadri AAA, Romero A, Bengoechea C, Guerrero A (2018) The effect of carboxyl group content on water uptake capacity and tensile properties of functionalized soy protein-based superabsorbent plastics. J Polym Environ 26(7):2934–2944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-018-1183-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Álvarez-Castillo E et al (2018) Optimization of a thermal process for the production of superabsorbent materials based on a soy protein isolate. Ind Crops Prod 125(May):573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.09.051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fernández-Espada L, Bengoechea C, Cordobés F, Guerrero A (2016) Thermomechanical properties and water uptake capacity of soy protein-based bioplastics processed by injection molding. J Appl Polym Sci 133(24):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamada M, Morimitsu S, Hosono E, Yamada T (2020) Preparation of bioplastic using soy protein. Int J Biol Macromol 149:1077–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gennadios A, Brandenburg AH, Weller CL, Testin RF (1993) Effect of pH on properties of wheat gluten and soy protein isolate films. J Agric Food Chem 41(11):1835–1839. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00035a006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rhim JW, Gennadios A, Handa A, Weller CL, Hanna MA (2000) Solubility, tensile, and color properties of modified soy protein isolate films. J Agric Food Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0005418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar P, Sandeep KP, Alavi S, Truong VD, Gorga RE (2010) Preparation and characterization of bio-nanocomposite films based on soy protein isolate and montmorillonite using melt extrusion. J Food Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.04.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cuadri AA, Romero A, Bengoechea C, Guerrero A (2017) Natural superabsorbent plastic materials based on a functionalized soy protein. Polym Test 58:126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.12.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jiménez-Rosado M, Perez-Puyana V, Cordobés F, Romero A, Guerrero A (2019) Development of superabsorbent soy protein-based bioplastic matrices with incorporated zinc for horticulture. J Sci Food Agric. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Felix M, Perez-Puyana V, Romero A, Guerrero A (2017) Development of protein-based bioplastics modified with different additives. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.45430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Felix M, Perez-Puyana V, Romero A, Guerrero A (2017) Production and characterization of bioplastics obtained by injection moulding of various protein systems. J Polym Environ 25(1):91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-016-0790-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Álvarez-Castillo E, Bengoechea C, Guerrero A (2020) Composites from by-products of the food industry for the development of superabsorbent biomaterials. Food Bioprod Process 119:296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2019.11.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Otaigbe JU, Jane J (1997) Pressure-volume-temperature relationships of soy protein isolate/starch plastic. J Environ Polym Degrad 5(2):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Goodship V (2017) ARBURG practical guide to injection moulding, 2nd edn. Smithers Rapra, Shawbury

    Google Scholar 

  38. Álvarez-Castillo E, Del Toro AJ, Aguilar JM, Guerrero A, Bengoechea C (2019) Formation of soy protein-based superabsorbent materials through optimization o f a thermal processing. Afinidad 76(585):23–29

    Google Scholar 

  39. Peres AM, Pires RR, Oréfice RL (2016) Evaluation of the effect of reprocessing on the structure and properties of low density polyethylene/thermoplastic starch blends. Carbohydr Polym 136:210–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nuthong P, Benjakul S, Prodpran T (2009) Effect of some factors and pretreatment on the properties of porcine plasma protein-based films. LWT Food Sci Technol 42(9):1545–1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.05.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bernard C, Christian A, Jean-Louis C, Stéphane G (2018) Edible packaging films based on fish myofibrillar proteins: formulation and functional properties. J Food Sci 60(6):1369–1374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1995.tb04593.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zárate-Ramírez L, Martínez I, Romero A, Partal P, Guerrero A (2010) Wheat gluten-based materials plasticised with glycerol and water by thermoplastic mixing and thermomoulding. J Sci Food Agric 91(4):625–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mo X, Sun XS, Wang Y (1999) Effects of molding temperature and pressure on properties of soy protein polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 73(13):2595–2602. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990923)73:13%3c2595::AID-APP6%3e3.0.CO;2-I

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ciannamea EM, Stefani PM, Ruseckaite RA (2014) Physical and mechanical properties of compression molded and solution casting soybean protein concentrate based films. Food Hydrocoll 38:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.12.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the financial support provided by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación—Agencia Estatal de Investigación (MICINN) and FEDER programme through the project with reference: RTI2018-097100-B-C21. They also would thank to the Microanalysis and Microscopy Service (CITIUS-Universidad de Sevilla) for providing full access and assistance to the LECO-CHNS-932.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla, Calle Virgen de África, 7, 41011, Sevilla, Spain

    Estefanía Álvarez-Castillo, Antonio Guerrero & Carlos Bengoechea

  2. Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Química, Universidad de Sevilla, Calle Profesor García González, 1, 41012, Sevilla, Spain

    Gabriel Caballero

Authors
  1. Estefanía Álvarez-Castillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabriel Caballero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio Guerrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carlos Bengoechea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Estefanía Álvarez-Castillo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors confirm that the manuscript is an original work. The authors also declare that they have no known competing financial interests which could have influenced the work reported in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Álvarez-Castillo, E., Caballero, G., Guerrero, A. et al. Effect of Formulation and Pressure on Injection Moulded Soy Protein-Based Plastics. J Polym Environ 29, 2789–2796 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02082-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02082-w

Keywords

  • Soy protein
  • Rheology
  • Injection moulding
  • Viscoelasticity
  • Processing
  • Absorbent