Characterization of a κ-Carrageenan Hydrogel and its Evaluation as a Coating Material for Fertilizers

Abstract

A novel carrageenan-based hydrogel (CBH) was developed via cross-linking and ion interaction methods to obtain a coating for NPK fertilizer grains. Attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared analysis (ATR–FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), texture profile analysis (TPA), rheological study, and swelling kinetics were used to characterize the physicochemical properties of the CBH. To test the slow-release behavior of the coated fertilizer and the adequate provision of nutrients for plants, the leaching rates of N, P, and K were determined through soil column experiments, and plant growth indicators were measured in greenhouse experiments in a yellow potato crop (Solanum phureja). The results showed that CBH is a material with homogeneous appearance, porous structure, similar chemical structure to κ-carrageenan, and resistance and low deformation at the fracture point. The swelling behavior experiments showed a maximum increase in thickness of 74% by water absorption, with osmolality being an important factor controlling the entry of water into the CBH. Wash experiments in soil columns showed that the noncoated granules released 12 and 18% less N–NH4+ and K+ than the noncoated fertilizer, both after 90 mm of accumulated precipitation. Less than 0.1% of P–PO4−3 was lost in both treatments. No significant differences were observed in any of the growth plant and quality indicator variables between the plants grown with coated and noncoated fertilizer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Russel DA, Williams GG (1977) Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:260–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    FAO (1981) Crop production levels and fertilizer use. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin 2, Rome

  3. 3.

    Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA (2002) Nature 418:671–677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Smil V (2000) Annu Rev Energ Environ 25:53–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cassman KG, Dobermann A, Walters DT (2002) AMBIO 31:132–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Alfaro MA, Jarvis SC, Gregory PJ (2004) Soil Use Manag 20:182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhao BQ, Li XY, Liu H, Wang BR, Zhu P, Huang SM, Bao DJ, Li YT, So HB (2011) NJAS Wagen J Life Sci 58:177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ongley OD (1996) Control of water pollution from agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 55. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Withers PJA, Neal C, Jarvie HP, Doody DG (2014) Sustainability 6:5853–5875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bouwman AF, Boumans LJM, Batjes NH (2002) Global Biogeochem Cycles 16:6–13

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bhatia A, Pathak H, Aggarwal PK (2004) Curr Sci 87:317–324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Molina-Herrera S, Haas E, Klatt S, Kraus D, Augustin J, Magliulo V, Tallec T, Ceschia E, Amman C, Loubet B, Skiba U, Jones S, Brümmer C, Butterbach-Bahl K, Kiese R (2016) Sci Total Environ 553:128–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations (2015) World fertilizer trends and outlook to 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Drescher A, Glaser R, Richert C, Nippes KR (2011) Demand for key nutrients (NPK) in the year 2050. University of Freiburg Department of Geography. Draft report

  15. 15.

    UN DESA (2017) World population prospects: the 2017 revision. United Nations, New York

  16. 16.

    Calabi-Floody M, Medina J, Rumpel C (2018) Adv Agron 147:119–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Azeem B, KuShaari K, Man ZB, Basit A, Thanh TH (2014) J Control Release 181:11–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Naz MY, Sulaiman SA (2016) J Control Release 225:109–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Jing W, Song LIU, Yukun QIN (2017) Chin J Oceanol Limnol 35:1086–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Campos EVR, de Oliveira JL, Fraceto LF, Singh B (2014) Agron Sustain Dev 35:47–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Guilherme MR, Aouada FA, Fajardo AR, Martins AF, Paulino AT, Davi MF, Rubira AF, Muniz EC (2015) Eur Polym J 72:365–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kuang J, Yuk KY, Huh KM (2011) Carbohydr Polym 83:284–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bai W, Song J, Zhang H (2013) Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 63:433–441

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hou X, Li R, He W (2017) J Soils Sediments 1–11

  25. 25.

    Rhim J, Wang L (2013)) Carbohydr Polym 96:71–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wang Y, Liu M, Ni B, Xie L (2012) Ind Eng Chem Res 51:1413–1422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Avella M, Emilia DP, Immirzi B, Impallomeni G, Malinconico M, Santagata G (2007) Carbohydr Polym 69:503–511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    FAO (2008) International year of the potato. http://www.fao.org/potato-2008/en/world/. Accessed 1 Nov 2018

  29. 29.

    FAO (2002) Fertilizer use by crop. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin No. 16. Rome

  30. 30.

    Pons M, Fiszman SM (1996) J Texture Stud 27:597–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Senff H. Richtering W (1999) J Chem Phys 111:1705–1711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Macleod GS, Collett JH, Fell JT (1999) J Control Release 58:303–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Qiao D, Liu H, Yu L, Bao X, Simon GP. Petinakis E, Chen L (2016) Carbohydr Polym 147:146–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    R Core Team (2016) A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria

  35. 35.

    Dean BB, Thornton RE (1992) The specific gravity of Potatoe. Extension bulletin 1541. Washington State University, Cooperative Extension, Pullman

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Manuhara GJ, Praseptiangga D, Riyanto RA (2016) Aquat Procedia 7:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Torres MD, Chenlo F, Moreira R (2018) Carbohydr Polym 180:72–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rhein-Knudsen N, Ale MT, Ajalloueian F, Yu L, Meyer AS (2017) Food Hydrocolloids 63:50–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chen J, Park K (2000) J Control Release 65:73–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rashidzadeh A, Olad A (2014) Carbohydr Poly 114:269–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Derkach SR, Voron’ko NG, Kuchin YA, Kolotova DS, Gordeeva AM, Faizullin DA, Makshakova ON (2018) Carbohydr Polym 197:66–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ruiz Aviles G (2006) Ingeniería y Ciencia 2:5–28

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Farhan A, Hani NM (2017) Food Hydrocolloids 64:48–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Li X, Li Q, Xu X, Su Y, Yue Q, Gao B (2016) J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 60:564–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Shi Y, Xiong D, Liu Y, Wang N, Zhao X (2016) Mater Sci Eng C 65:172–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ako K (2017) Carbohydr Polym 169:376–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Drozdov AD, Christiansen JDC, Sanporean CG (2016) Int J Solids Struct 87:11–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Daza Agudelo JI, Badano JM, Rintoul I (2018) Mater Chem Chem Phys 216:14–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Senna AM, Botaro VR (2017) J Control Release 260:194–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Have M, Marmagne A, Chardon F, Masclaux-Daubresse C (2017) J Exp Bot 68:2513–2529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Hopkins WG, Hüner NPA (2008) Introduction to plant physiology, 4th edn. Wiley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Li X, He JZ, Liu YR, Zheng YM (2013) J Soils Sediments 13:711–719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Li Y, Sun Y, Liao S (2017) Agric Water Manag 186:139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Li P, Lu J, Wang Y (2018) Agric Ecosyst Environ 251:78–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Zhu Q, Zhang M, Ma Q (2012) Sci Hortic 143:109–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Zhao B, Dong S, Zhang J, Liu P (2013) PLoS ONE 8:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    González ME, Cea M, Medina J, González A, Diez MC, Cartes P, Monreal C, Navia R (2015) Sci Total Environ 505:446–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Chen D, Suter H, Islam A, Edis R, Freney JR, Walker CN (2008) Aust J Soil Res 46:289–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Fedepapa (2018) El agricultor y su papel en el pais. Bogotá, Colombia

  60. 60.

    Harmunt K, Stephan-Beckmann S (1997) Potato Res 40:135–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Carlos Nústez for providing access to the greenhouse facility at National University. This work was carried out with the support of the Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de la República de Colombia (Grant No. 1202-669-45888) and Jorge Tadeo Lozano University. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest. All data analyzed during this study are included in this article supplementary information files.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johanna Santamaría Vanegas.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santamaría Vanegas, J., Rozo Torres, G. & Barreto Campos, B. Characterization of a κ-Carrageenan Hydrogel and its Evaluation as a Coating Material for Fertilizers. J Polym Environ 27, 774–783 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-019-01384-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Carrageenan
  • Coated fertilizers
  • Hydropolymers
  • Solanum phureja