Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid and Low-Cost Method for Evaluation of Nutrient Release from Controlled-Release Fertilizers Using Electrical Conductivity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymers and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methods to determine nutrient release rates of coated fertilizers usually rely on chemical analyses, which often are time-consuming and/or expensive. Our goal was to develop an innovative and rapid low-cost method to evaluate nutrient release from polymer coated MAP or urea using conductometry. The release in water is determined by measuring the electric conductivity (EC) over time, with intervals dependent on release rates. In the case of soluble salt fertilizers, EC can be immediately determined and converted to a concentration using a calibration curve. In the case of urea, an additional step is needed to convert the neutral urea into ammonium. The release rates in water were assessed for a range of commercial and laboratory-coated fertilizers. A validation test demonstrated strong agreement with the release determined using analytical techniques. The EC method hence offers an easy way to quickly evaluate the time course of release of nutrients from controlled-release fertilizers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Abbreviations

EC:

Electrical conductivity

N:

Nitrogen

P:

Phosphorus

CRF:

Controlled release fertilizers

PCF:

Polymer coated fertilizers

TKN:

Total Kjeldahl nitrogen

MAP:

Monoammonium phosphate

ICP-OES:

Inductively couple plasma optical emission spectroscopy

References

  1. Timilsena YP, Adhikari R, Casey P, Muster T, Gill H, Adhikari B (2015) Enhanced efficiency fertilisers: a review of formulation and nutrient release patterns. J Sci Food Agric 95:1131–1142. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lubkowski K, Smorowska A, Grzmil B, Kozłowska A (2015) Controlled-release fertilizer prepared using a biodegradable aliphatic copolyester of poly(butylene succinate) and dimerized fatty acid. J Agric Food Chem 63:2597–2605. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang Y, Zhang M, Li Y, Fan X, Geng Y (2012) Improving the quality of polymer-coated urea with recycled plastic, proper additives, and large tablets. J Agric Food Chem 60:11229–11237. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf302813g

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu P, Zhang Y, Jia C, Li Y, Zhang M, Mao Z (2016) Degradation of polyurethane coating materials from liquefied wheat straw for controlled release fertilizers. J Appl Polym Sci 133:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang Y, Tong Z, Geng Y, Li Y, Zhang M (2013) Biobased polymer composites derived from corn stover and feather meals as double-coating materials for controlled-release and water-retention urea fertilizers. J Agric Food Chem 61:8166–8174. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf402519t

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Du CW, Zhou JM, Shaviv A (2006) Release characteristics of nutrients from polymer-coated compound controlled release fertilizers. J Polym Environ 14:223–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-006-0025-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujinuma R, Balster NJ, Norman JM (2009) An improved model of nitrogen release for surface-applied controlled-release fertilizer. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:2043–2050. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Medina LC, Sartain JB, Obreza TA, Hall WL, Thiex NJ (2014) Optimization and validation of an accelerated laboratory extraction method to estimate nitrogen release patterns of slow- and controlled-release fertilizers. J AOAC Int 97:661–676. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.12-482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Medina LC, Sartain JB, Obreza TA, Thiex NJ (2014) Evaluation of a soil incubation method to characterize nitrogen release patterns of slow- and controlled-release fertilizers. J AOAC Int 79:643–660. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.13-065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson ML, Rosen CJ, Moncrief JF (2009) A comparison of techniques for determining nitrogen release from polymer-coated urea in the field. HortScience 44:492–494

    Google Scholar 

  11. Medina LC, Obreza TA, Sartain JB, Rouse RE (2008) Nitrogen release patterns of a mixed controlled-release fertilizer and its components. Horttechnology 18:475–480

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Watanabe A, Takebayashi Y, Ohtsubo T, Furukawa M (2009) Permeation of urea through various polyurethane membranes. Pest Manag Sci 65:1233–1240. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carson LC, Ozores-Hampton M (2012) Methods for determining nitrogen release from controlled-release fertilizers used for vegetable production. Horttechnology 22:20–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guilbault GG, Smith RK, Montalvo JG (1969) Use of ion selective electrodes in enzymic analysis. Cation electrodes for deaminase enzyme systems. Anal Chem 41:600–605. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60273a016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fidaleo M, Lavecchia R (2003) Kinetic study of enzymatic urea hydrolysis in the pH range 4–9. Chem Biochem Eng Q 17:311–318

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Krajewska B (2009) Ureases I. Functional, catalytic and kinetic properties: a review. J Mol Catal 59:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.01.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. International Standard ISO (1997) Water quality—determination of ammonium nitrogen by flow analysis (CFA and FIA) and spectrometric detection. Int. Stand. ISO 11732

  19. R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing

  20. Gray JR (2005) Conductivity analyzers and their application. In: Down RD, Lehr JH (eds) Environ. Instrum. Anal. Handb. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 491–510

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Broschat TK (2005) Rates of ammonium-nitrogen, nitrate-nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from two controlled-release fertilizers under different substrate environments. Horttechnology 15:332–335

    Google Scholar 

  22. Adams C, Frantz J, Bugbee B (2013) Macro- and micronutrient-release characteristics of three polymer-coated fertilizers: Theory and measurements. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176:76–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201200156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Broschat TK, Moore KK (2007) Release rates of ammonium-nitrogen, nitrate-nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, iron, and manganese from seven controlled-release fertilizers. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 38:843–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620701260946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Du C, Tang D, Zhou J, Wang H, Shaviv A (2008) Prediction of nitrate release from polymer-coated fertilizers using an artificial neural network model. Biosyst Eng 99:478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Trenkel M (2010) Slow- and controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers: an option for enhancing nutrient efficiency in agriculture, 2nd edn. International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fan XH, Li YC (2010) Nitrogen release from slow-release fertilizers as affected by soil type and temperature. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:1635–1641. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Degryse F, Baird R, da Silva RC, McLaughlin MJ (2017) Dissolution rate and agronomic effectiveness of struvite fertilizers—effect of soil pH, granulation and base excess. Plant Soil 410:139–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2990-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Alexander A, Helm H-U (1990) Ureaform as a slow release fertilizer: a review. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 153:249–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19901530410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kovar JL, Pierzynski GM (2009) Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments, residuals, and waters, 2nd edn. Virginia Tech University, Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ashleigh Broadbent for technical assistance and Roslyn Baird for language review. The first author acknowledges the CAPES foundation for a scholarship, process code BEX 3904/15-6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Lopes Cancellier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cancellier, E.L., Degryse, F., Silva, D.R.G. et al. Rapid and Low-Cost Method for Evaluation of Nutrient Release from Controlled-Release Fertilizers Using Electrical Conductivity. J Polym Environ 26, 4388–4395 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-018-1309-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-018-1309-1

Keywords